Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Teacher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G5) by Ponyo. (non-admin closure) Anup [Talk] 20:41, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Teacher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the WP:NOTFILM criteria. One article source only mentions it in passing. Can't find reliable sources or significant coverage. Yintan 20:32, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added significant new reliable sources on the article. Keep the article.Riisen (talk) 08:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural note I've deleted the article under CSD#G5 as it was created by a confirmed sock.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.