Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonstersGame
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 00:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant spam for an online RPG game. The Alexa rank of game website is 13,508, for the creators' website it is 394,303. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 14:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete reads like an avert, I can find no reviews of the game and a majority of webhits are from various forums. Not-notable as far as I can tell. DrunkenSmurf 15:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Not Spam - This is not an advert. This entry's creation was approved by the game owners at RedMoon Studios. English is not the main language supported by the game, which might account for the difference in Alexa values (main servers are German-based). There are no inappropriate links or content, so what other justification is there for deletion? - Nitallica 14:36, 18 June 2006 (CST)
- User's only contributions are to MonstersGame. - Mike Rosoft 08:41, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep — I've rewrote the article so it doesn't sound so much an ad or user guide. I agree that it still needs work however. The game is very community based and it's expected IMHO to find most of hits coming from various forums. - Ðra 07:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "This entry's creation was approved by the game owners at RedMoon Studios." <-- that usually makes it an advert. ILovePlankton 19:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 19:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per Nitallica and Dra. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Mmmm, tastes like spam to me. Dipics 18:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete not notable. - Wickning1 20:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep This seems to have a large following even if mostly among German speakers. I only came here after stumbling upon it from another website.--Lzygenius 05:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.