Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olsi Rama
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. extransit (talk) 02:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Olsi Rama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Besides the fact that this guy is Edi Rama's brother, there is no other notability to the subject. The only reason why it can't be speedy deleted is because it has stayed here for a long time. Sulmues Let's talk 19:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Can't find reliable sources to justify this article. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. GoogleScholar does show a few publications, but with fairly low citability, none as first author, certainly not enough to pass WP:PROF. No evidence of significant coverage to show passing WP:BIO either. Nsk92 (talk) 06:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WoS gives essentially the same results. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete. Not notable and have never heard of him before, except for being Edi Rama's brother (which I learned just now). Cheers. — Kedadi 02:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in the absence of evidence of passing WP:PROF. That's the only plausible case I can see for notability; the family ties are clearly insufficient. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.