Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pimalga
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pimalga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't find the sources to show WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG are met, but aware I may be missing something as I am not familiar with Burkina Faso. Boleyn (talk) 11:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Africa. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:22, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: this government report suggests that the place is a populated, legally recognized settlement, which is enough to meet WP:GEOLAND. Owen× ☎ 16:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: "Even abandoned places can be notable", clearly passes WP:NPLACE. AfD isn't cleanup. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:18, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.