Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powdair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Based on the discussion it seems like the topic is not notable, and the points raised by the only keep !vote do not address this issue. That the company may become more notable in the future does not mean it will. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:14, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Powdair

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable airline. Does not pass WP:NCOMP. One French source about them starting up. One German source about a new investment. Two passing mentions [1] and [2]. A bunch of press releases. Recommend delete without prejudice - they have the potential to become notable, as soon as they actually start flights (in December). menaechmi (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice Pardon me, but what is a virtual airline? A travel agent or tour packager I understand. The article says in one place they will fly Embraers and in another Canadair Challengers. Rhadow (talk) 16:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not exist yet. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment They are taking money, however. Rhadow (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Could be notable in the future but the company isn't even operational according to the references. There are quite a few references but mainly announcements of funding and nothing that I feel meets WP:CORPDEPTH --CNMall41 (talk) 03:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The article is badly written but the airline website is up and running, company is open, business is taking place. Pointless to delete an article then create a new one in a few months when it is a business running. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.240.244.27 (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.