Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premium Herald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus DGG ( talk ) 18:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Premium Herald

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This news outlet hasn't been covered by independent reliable sources and seems to fail WP:NMEDIA and WP:GNG —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Media-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Premium Herald has NO sign of notability whatsoever. This article appears to have been created for the sole purpose of self-promotion and should not be reposted until there are independent reliable sources about the subject. Press releases are not reliable sources, and neither is Digital Journal. Scorpion293 (talk) 03:09, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Premium Herald should not be deleted. Premium Herald is a new media company and the page on Wikipedia was not created for "Promotion purposes". The website is widely known by a good majority in Nigeria and mostly abroad. It is an independent company but i believe they also rely on other news vendors for materials. Please consider this again. Historywiki11 (talk) 18:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 22:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability in WP:RS. Only sources seem to be the website itself, their social media pages and Wikipedia mirrors. Africa News has exactly one mention, and even that is only to quote one tweet. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as trivial and unconvincing and with only connections to local attention, nothing for actual substance as a fact of this. SwisterTwister talk 07:25, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.