Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Random Encounters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Random Encounters

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed as I was told to "consider potential notablity of other subjects that redirect here", but I don't see how that effects the notability of this page. There are three redirects here (AJ Pinkerton, CG5 (YouTuber), and NateWantsToBattle), but if none of those are notable enough for their own pages (though Nate might be given the coverage his music has been getting lately) then surely they aren't notable enough to get profiles on an article that itself isn't notable. And as I said in my PROD, I see no apparent claim to notability here. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 00:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Internet. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 00:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:11, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources are youtube or un-RS. Non-notable web series, the article looks like a fan site rather than a wiki article. Way too long of a list for every episode and not much critical discussion of the thing being mentioned in the article. Oaktree b (talk) 03:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:12, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It has the one source that discusses it in the title of the article, but other than that, it doesn't seem to have the same level of attention. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some articles cover multiple related subjects. If any of the subjects is notable, the article is a keeper. ~Kvng (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page is here to cover one series, not every person who happens to being involved in it. Those subjects should get their own articles to be judged independently for their own notability. And even if they are notable, notability is not inherited. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.