Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotsunda
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. nomination withdrawn, only delete vote no longer applies, further unanimous keep. Mgm|(talk) 12:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rotsunda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Advertising, a small city in the middle of nowhere pretty near to Sollentuna. The Rolling Camel (talk) 02:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep if it exists. Not advertising at all, has been stubbed. Long established consensus is that all settlements are notable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: It is an article that doesn't say much and it is not a useful article. I will change my !vote to keep if it gets expanded. Schuym1 (talk) 02:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Swedish Wikipedia redirects Rotsunda to Rotebro, which appears to be the same place and a notable one. --Oakshade (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. The article is short but it gives all the information you need to establish notability and the Swedish article shows it can be expanded. Barnstar to anyone who can read Swedish and expands it (you can claim it on my talk page). - Mgm|(talk) 09:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator Withdrawn - Alright, Its better with Rotebro, Rotebro have much more inportant results on google etc. I am translating from swedish wikipedia right now. The Rolling Camel (talk) 11:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.