Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roz Bell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roz Bell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sourcing is minor mentions in some performances. not significant awards either, so fails notability for musicians. She was afairy 21:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. Owen× 22:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The Canadian Radio Music Awards are not a top-level music award for the purposes of passing WP:NMUSIC #8 — they'd be fine to mention if the article were properly sourced, but are in no way "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass WP:GNG just because the article has the word "award" in its text. To be fair, the article has been marginally better referenced in the past, but by no means well enough that just reverting to the older version would be enough to pass GNG — and even weirder, the username of the editor who blanked a lot of the article's content and its few references, two years after adding a lot of that same stuff to the article themself, was...Rozbell. So we've also got conflict of interest issues here. Bearcat (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.