Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Strucci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 11:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shannon Strucci

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

run of the mill youtuber MistyGraceWhite (talk) 09:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:12, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While she is a small Youtuber, I think there's enough coverage of her from reliable sources to justify a page about her. FlyingKangeroo (talk) 23:40, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough coverage to justify an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:11, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Found 4 articles where this person is mentioned. One [1] mentions one of her projects in the title and dedicates a few paragraphs to it and then moves on to something else. There is a Kotaku article which is a bit more substantiative and discusses a different project [2]. She also gets a mention here [3] and is mentioned in passing in this Wired article [4]. These sources are either from very obscure or subject specific sites or don't contain significant coverage as stipulated in WP:GNG. Her channel is the smallest i've seen on Wikipedia for a YouTuber aswell. Narrowly fails WP:GNG and fails WP:BIO by a long way. AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 21:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a small YouTube following and being a member of a podcast is not notable Barrettsprivateers (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.