Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squibbon
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. – Robert T | @ | C 00:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Fictional animal from an Animal Planet documentary. Not notable enough to merit it's own entry; not even sure if the show, "The Future Is Wild" merits it's own entry or belongs on Animal Planet. Jasmol 19:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the original show has been released on DVD and has its own theme park so it clearly passes notability. The article for The Future is Wild will be too large and unmanageable if everything is forced to be merged into it. That leaves the options of separate pages for each future organism, separate page by future date (I would argue that that would be too unmanageable as well), or separate article by episode. Right now, most of the organisms have their own pages and the squibbon page is consistent with that. Please note that this TV series is used as an educational tool in classrooms across the world so if you afd patrolers axe this, please do so in a way that does not destroy content. Students will be looking to wikipedia regarding this. --Aranae 08:10, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Rainbow Squid discussion above. Turnstep 20:44, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Izehar 22:22, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.