Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technozoids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Zoids. JForget 23:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Technozoids

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a minor toy line of a larger franchise. It doesn't assert notability and the details are very trivial, so it doesn't need to exist. TTN (talk) 13:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What gives with all these non-notable product lines? Cheers to TTN for weeding them out. JBsupreme (talk) 05:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Zoids. The delete vote above should be discounted as it's a blatantly obvious WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Jtrainor (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - There doesn't appear to be enough reliable information out there. Information, yes, but not from reliable sources. I have some of these in my basement, somewhere. It seems to have been popular enough to be notable, but just not enough stuff published about them. I recommend the article be redirected to Zoids and any notable information merged into the section on the Zoids page. --Odie5533 (talk) 15:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.