Wikipedia:Editor review/Bailmoney27
Bailmoney27 (talk · contribs · count) I have been editing actively on Wikipedia for nearly a year and would one day soon like to run for adminship. I am also looking for just a general review. Bailmoney27 (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- Usually when editing, I try to welcome new users and review new users' edits (and take appropriate action when needed). I also recently have been reviewing topics of which I am particularly knowledgable about, or update articles in which the subject has currently changed.
- Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
- I have not been in an editing dispute, but should I ever have to partake in one, I would intensely research the topic at hand and provide references that support my standpoint on the issue, and take the appropriate action from there. If I am wrong, obviously I will happily concede.
- What do you want to get out of this editor review? Are you thinking of running for adminship? Would you like feedback on a specific area of your editing? Or would you just like a general review of your edits?
- I would like to run for adminship in the very near future, though I am also looking for a general review of my edits as I become more active on Wikipedia.
Reviews
He did revert my edits on a page I made for a school, but I didn't do anything to do with vandalism. I didn't use crude humor or blank any pages so I am confused. But, I do like it when people help me, so I will give him a 3.5/5. Kurtisawesome01 16:23, 29 October 2013 (UTC)