Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 8

< February 7	February 9 >

February 8

File:Anne Helm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a living person. The fair-use rationale points out that she retired from acting in 1986, but the general rule that is typically applied is that non-free photographs of living people are considered replaceable (in the context of WP:NFCC#1), unless there are very exceptional circumstances that would prohibit a photograph. No justification is given explaining such exceptional circumstances in this case. —Bkell (talk) 02:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CoverUpWordmark.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary fan artwork. Description covers all game elements. Sottolacqua (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LuckySevenWordmark.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary fan artwork. Description covers all game elements. Sottolacqua (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MasterKeyWordmark.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary fan artwork. Description covers all game elements. Sottolacqua (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SwitcherooWordmark.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary fan artwork. Description covers all game elements. Sottolacqua (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TenChancesWordmark.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary fan artwork. Description covers all game elements. Sottolacqua (talk) 04:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dinah Manoff in Grease 1978.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Has no non-free use rationale, and uploader has removed {{di-no fair use rationale}} twice and added an inapropriate {{rk}}. Article has no critical commentary on image. —teb728 t c 11:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mic Sokoli.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Painting of unknown authorship, but obviously modern (probably second half of 20th cent.), most likely copyrighted. Used as decorative illustration of an historical figure from an earlier age, no claim to authenticity as a portrait, not the object of commentary as an artwork, therefore fails NFCC#8. No meaningful FUR. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a 1969 painting of Sali Shijaku, so it's copyrightable and should be deleted.--— ZjarriRrethues — ^talk 17:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CovenantConglDemorestGA.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Drawing of a church. Unused. Why not take a photo? MGA73 (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and delete. While the chapel is still in place, the congregation that was housed within it closed some time ago.Mike (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Unused drawing. Reh man 10:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Japanesefont.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Commons and deleted. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 16:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file with text. Doubt it will ever be used. MGA73 (talk) 19:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons it illustrates different fonts, so it would require having those fonts installed if it weren't an image. License appears to be compatible. It could be used on a font article. 65.94.45.238 (talk) 06:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it's in use now, someone has put it to use. 65.94.45.238 (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ert ncr2003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused "drawing" of a car. Perhaps an old userpage image? MGA73 (talk) 19:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Maybe from some game? Reh man 09:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fairburn et al Anorexia Model.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused model of anorexia. Since it is not used it has probably been replaced by a better file. MGA73 (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Finnish parliamentary election 2003.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused diagram of election results in 2003. Doubt it will ever be used. MGA73 (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it can be added to Finnish parliamentary election, 2003. 65.94.45.238 (talk) 05:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe Iheanacho Caf African Champions League 2003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File for deleted article - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iheanacho Joe Senssini MGA73 (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe Iheanacho 2003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File for deleted article - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iheanacho Joe Senssini MGA73 (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Josh Warner LIT Magazine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image was used in deleted article (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Warner (second nomination)). File is not uploaded by copyright holder. Uploader says photographer has given a permission. It is not in OTRS (uploaded in 2007). Since the image is not used I suggest a deletion. MGA73 (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lanageddon logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. MGA73 (talk) 19:58, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Midway View.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file - low res. MGA73 (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LaurenceauCelebration.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Would certainly have loved to have kept this one, but unfortunately, the OTRS permission, as I understand it, was insufficient. If sufficient permission is obtained in the future, then feel free to reverse this deletion, but until then, I'm afraid we must delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A photo of a painting is a derivative work. It is used in Lyonel Laurenceau and the name of the uploader is "Alexlaurenceau" so it could be a relative. It could be solved with a permission but uploader is no longer active so adding a "no permission" would probably be the same as a speedy deletion. I will send a mail to uploader along with this DR hoping he will get the mail. In case we do not get a permission we have to decide if we should delete. MGA73 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes, I am the artist son and I have full authorization from him to use this picture on Wikipedia. What do you need to get the right permission from the artist??

You have our full collaboration..

Thank you

alexlaurenceau — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexlaurenceau (talk • contribs) 20:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If possible a mail from lyonel@laurenceau.ca would be good. It should confirm that Lyonel Laurenceau (who created the work) agrees that the photo is licensed a public domain. The mail should be send to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. --MGA73 (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! A mail has been send! --MGA73 (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Millenium 2003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file. No proof of permission. MGA73 (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bsboard.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive fairuse. Bonus game can be identified without a screencap. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Sottolacqua (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bsboardbonus.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive fairuse. Bonus game can be identified without a screencap. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Sottolacqua (talk) 21:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since Sottolacqua uploaded this and the image above it, I have tagged both for G7. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 00:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NationalChamps.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Low res. Usable? MGA73 (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ontl2007.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file. As far as I can tell it has been replaced by File:39th OntLA.png. MGA73 (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:One.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These files are unused:

Most of them was used in this article (was moved to userspace before it was deleted). Now that article is deleted I doubt files will ever be used. Last file is not a part of the serie but it is also unused. MGA73 (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, per nom. Don't see any use. Reh man 10:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PDRM0043.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Name of photographer does not match uploader. MGA73 (talk) 22:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Korowa Crest 2011.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded in error Korowaags (talk) 23:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G7 seems to be in order —teb728 t c 01:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.