Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EEng
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy keep. No valid reason given to delete. NeilN talk to me 07:29, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
This user page has images that go under the sidebar, which makes the sidebar nearly impossible to read. MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 06:47, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- With all due respect, MorbidEntree how the fuck is the layout of my user page any of your business? EEng 06:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- @EEng: I came across it and noticed how it broke the layout of the wiki, that's how it's "my business." I don't understand why you came out with fists metaphorically swinging at me though. --MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 07:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Why? Because you have the nerve to suggest deletion of my user page for a completely stupid, inconsequential reason. Sorry if you can't see that the layout is entirely intentional. Now withdraw the nomination so I don't have to be pissed off at you any more. With four months' experience here you should probably be a teensy bit more circumspect. EEng 07:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- @EEng: I came across it and noticed how it broke the layout of the wiki, that's how it's "my business." I don't understand why you came out with fists metaphorically swinging at me though. --MorbidEntree - (Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)(please reply using {{ping}}) 07:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- With all due respect, MorbidEntree how the fuck is the layout of my user page any of your business? EEng 06:56, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Make that a speedy keep, if such a thing exists. No valid reason suggested for why this should be deleted. Meters (talk) 07:17, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. No violation of WP:USERPAGE has been identified. If you find the page difficult to read, the simple solution is: move on to some other reading material. Try a novel. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.