Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 August 24
August 24
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- File:KJ Screen Shot.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Defined as a screen shot. No license or permission to use given. Copyright likely held by TV/ film company. Egghead06 (talk) 14:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- File:MelSachsAttorney.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It is painfully obvious that this is a screen grab from a television, not a photo that a user took of this person. You can even see the name of either the program or the network in the lower left corner. Further, it is of fairly poor quality, it looks like they just took a picture of their tv screen. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:30, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- File:Ajantrik GB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image is signed and watermarked. Neither appear to of any relation to the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- File:The Night Runners, From Left to Right, Laz & Richard Mason.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image was also uploaded by the same user as File:The Night Runners, from left to right, Laz & Richard Mason.jpg with the source given as "Richard Mason, The Night Runners, Rated R Publishing LLC, 2013" and non-free licensing (that version is tagged as replaceable fair use). Evidence of ownership/permission for the cc-zero licence needed. January (talk) 19:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relisted for further discussion at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2014_September_2. TLSuda (talk) 12:58, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- File:Mondrian CompRYB.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no evidence that this is in the public domain in the United States as there is no evidence that it was published before 1923 or that it wasn't published at all until 2003. Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep It's certainly too simple for copyright protection in the United States. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- Why do you think so? Drawing lines and filling in colours looks about as complicated as making File:Prince logo.svg, which the United States Copyright Office decided is copyrighted. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.