Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

When does passive learning improve the effectiveness of active learning?

Abstract

Much of what we learn comes from a mix of information thatwe select (active) and information that we receive (passive).But which type of training is better for different kinds of learn-ing problems? Here, we explore this question by comparingdifferent sequences of active/passive training in an abstractconcept learning task. First, we replicate the active learningadvantage from Markant & Gureckis (2014) (Experiments 1aand 1b). Then, we provide a test of whether experiencing ac-tive learning first or passive learning first improves the effec-tiveness of concept learning (Experiment 2). Across both ex-periments, active training led to better learning of the targetconcept, but “passive-first” learners were more accurate than“active-first” learners and more efficient than “active-only”learners. These findings broaden our understanding of whendifferent sequences of active/passive learning are more effec-tive, suggesting that for certain problems active explorationcan be enhanced with prior passive experience.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View