ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifari... more ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circles both within and outside the country. There were deep concerns that the ‘moderate’ Islamic-oriented Justice and Development Party (AKP) might try to dismantle the very bases of the secular state. Fifteen years of AKP rule have displayed four distinctively different periods: (1) Normalization and reinstitution of civil governance (2002–2007); (2) Methodological transition (2007–2009); (3) Consolidation of power-base (2009–2011); and (4) De-secularization, de-democratization, re-securitization and shift to authoritarianism (2011–2016). Drawing upon the ‘competitive authoritarianism’ literature and the concept of ‘instrumentalization of democracy,’ this article will elaborate the above points as well as the intrinsic Islamist mindset of the AKP. Use of foreign policy as an instrument of legitimation of Islamist policies and anti-secular transformation will also be examined.
ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifari... more ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circles both within and outside the country. There were deep concerns that the ‘moderate’ Islamic-oriented Justice and Development Party (AKP) might try to dismantle the very bases of the secular state. Fifteen years of AKP rule have displayed four distinctively different periods: (1) Normalization and reinstitution of civil governance (2002–2007); (2) Methodological transition (2007–2009); (3) Consolidation of power-base (2009–2011); and (4) De-secularization, de-democratization, re-securitization and shift to authoritarianism (2011–2016). Drawing upon the ‘competitive authoritarianism’ literature and the concept of ‘instrumentalization of democracy,’ this article will elaborate the above points as well as the intrinsic Islamist mindset of the AKP. Use of foreign policy as an instrument of legitimation of Islamist policies and anti-secular transformation will also be examined.
Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, dar anlamda sosyal politikanın alanına giren emek-sermaye i... more Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, dar anlamda sosyal politikanın alanına giren emek-sermaye ilişkileri ve bunların sonuçları yanında, geniş anlamda sosyal politikanın konusu olan işsizlik, demografi ve nüfus çalışmaları, yoksulluk, sosyal yardımlar, sosyal hizmetler, ...
Page 1. TC ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ YAYINI NO: 1054 AÇIKÖĞRETİM FAKÜLTESİ YAYINI NO: 572 İLAHİYAT ÖNL... more Page 1. TC ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ YAYINI NO: 1054 AÇIKÖĞRETİM FAKÜLTESİ YAYINI NO: 572 İLAHİYAT ÖNLİSANS PROGRAMI (İÖP) SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE TEMEL KAVRAMLAR Yazar Öğr. Gör. Ahmet Cemal ANADOLU ...
The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circl... more The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circles both within and outside the country. There were deep concerns that the ‘moderate’ Islamic-oriented Justice and Development Party (AKP) might try to dismantle the very bases of the secular state. Fifteen years of AKP rule have displayed four distinctively different periods: (1) Normalization and reinstitution of civil governance (2002–2007); (2) Methodological transition (2007–2009); (3) Consolidation of power-base (2009–2011); and (4) De-secularization, de-democratization, re-securitization and shift to authoritarianism (2011–2016). Drawing upon the ‘competitive authoritarianism’ literature and the concept of ‘instrumentalization of democracy,’ this article will elaborate the above points as well as the intrinsic Islamist mindset of the AKP. Use of foreign policy as an instrument of legitimation of Islamist policies and anti-secular transformation will also be examined.
ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifari... more ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circles both within and outside the country. There were deep concerns that the ‘moderate’ Islamic-oriented Justice and Development Party (AKP) might try to dismantle the very bases of the secular state. Fifteen years of AKP rule have displayed four distinctively different periods: (1) Normalization and reinstitution of civil governance (2002–2007); (2) Methodological transition (2007–2009); (3) Consolidation of power-base (2009–2011); and (4) De-secularization, de-democratization, re-securitization and shift to authoritarianism (2011–2016). Drawing upon the ‘competitive authoritarianism’ literature and the concept of ‘instrumentalization of democracy,’ this article will elaborate the above points as well as the intrinsic Islamist mindset of the AKP. Use of foreign policy as an instrument of legitimation of Islamist policies and anti-secular transformation will also be examined.
ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifari... more ABSTRACT The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circles both within and outside the country. There were deep concerns that the ‘moderate’ Islamic-oriented Justice and Development Party (AKP) might try to dismantle the very bases of the secular state. Fifteen years of AKP rule have displayed four distinctively different periods: (1) Normalization and reinstitution of civil governance (2002–2007); (2) Methodological transition (2007–2009); (3) Consolidation of power-base (2009–2011); and (4) De-secularization, de-democratization, re-securitization and shift to authoritarianism (2011–2016). Drawing upon the ‘competitive authoritarianism’ literature and the concept of ‘instrumentalization of democracy,’ this article will elaborate the above points as well as the intrinsic Islamist mindset of the AKP. Use of foreign policy as an instrument of legitimation of Islamist policies and anti-secular transformation will also be examined.
Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, dar anlamda sosyal politikanın alanına giren emek-sermaye i... more Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, dar anlamda sosyal politikanın alanına giren emek-sermaye ilişkileri ve bunların sonuçları yanında, geniş anlamda sosyal politikanın konusu olan işsizlik, demografi ve nüfus çalışmaları, yoksulluk, sosyal yardımlar, sosyal hizmetler, ...
Page 1. TC ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ YAYINI NO: 1054 AÇIKÖĞRETİM FAKÜLTESİ YAYINI NO: 572 İLAHİYAT ÖNL... more Page 1. TC ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ YAYINI NO: 1054 AÇIKÖĞRETİM FAKÜLTESİ YAYINI NO: 572 İLAHİYAT ÖNLİSANS PROGRAMI (İÖP) SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE TEMEL KAVRAMLAR Yazar Öğr. Gör. Ahmet Cemal ANADOLU ...
The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circl... more The results of the 2002 general election in Turkey came as a powerful shock to multifarious circles both within and outside the country. There were deep concerns that the ‘moderate’ Islamic-oriented Justice and Development Party (AKP) might try to dismantle the very bases of the secular state. Fifteen years of AKP rule have displayed four distinctively different periods: (1) Normalization and reinstitution of civil governance (2002–2007); (2) Methodological transition (2007–2009); (3) Consolidation of power-base (2009–2011); and (4) De-secularization, de-democratization, re-securitization and shift to authoritarianism (2011–2016). Drawing upon the ‘competitive authoritarianism’ literature and the concept of ‘instrumentalization of democracy,’ this article will elaborate the above points as well as the intrinsic Islamist mindset of the AKP. Use of foreign policy as an instrument of legitimation of Islamist policies and anti-secular transformation will also be examined.
Uploads