Scientists have been communicating about climate change, water science and the significance of their research findings to society for decades. Yet we stand in 2012 with little abatement in real terms of greenhouse gas emissions and... more
Scientists have been communicating about climate change, water science and the significance of their research findings to society for decades. Yet we stand in 2012 with little abatement in real terms of greenhouse gas emissions and unsustainable water resources management, with adverse outcomes on associated ecosystems in the majority of catchments in agricultural and urban environments, including a high proportion in the Murray Darling Basin.
Clearly the community of scientists and science communicators have not been heard in a way that has provided enough motivation for government policy makers and corporate Australia to move on mass, to change the way they view the world and effectively address climate change and water
management.
Communication is about hearing as well as being heard. There are many views about how the earth’s resources should be used and by whom. Messages will be lost to the ether if they are not on a wavelength that is audible to the audience. A science message may not be heard even though it is of
vital importance to the maintenance of our water resources, atmosphere, and ecosystems.
Decisions on water resources management and climate change abatement are made within cultural, historical, economic and political bounds. Science communicators need to understand the contexts and frames of reference of various decision-makers and tailor messages accordingly, setting the right
pitch, amplitude and frequency.
This paper will outline some options for how science communicators can facilitate the holy grail of
change, based on the experience of the author as both a senior public servant responsible for policy development and as a research facilitator and mediator for university and government employers.
When well-drafted natural resource management legislation, based on sound policy is developed and this is endorsed by the government of the day and subsequently passed through Parliament - the stage is set. Or is it? The advent of... more
When well-drafted natural resource management legislation, based on sound policy is developed and this is endorsed by the government of the day and subsequently passed through Parliament - the stage is set. Or is it?
The advent of more and more (both in number and scope) natural resource legislation over recent years is generally welcomed by those working in this field. This is occurring at the time in Australia’s history where “small government” is the norm, and where the number and diversity of bodies with an interest in the environment - both government and non-government are increasing. How will effective implementation of legislation be ensured?
This paper discusses six essential elements which are required for the successful long-term implementation of integrated water resource management, based on experiences to date in the Onkaparinga and associated catchments.
