Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane2020-08-22 18:46:40 +0000
committerTom Lane2020-08-22 18:46:40 +0000
commit4d346def1555ea55b3adf76fc4afa3d3495ecfdd (patch)
tree65ba9e2588c2d09980a4505b743b48250ac517af /doc/src/sgml/gist.sgml
parent5b02d68e758307e0ae8fae4d7bbcd687f1dd6ce1 (diff)
Avoid pushing quals down into sub-queries that have grouping sets.
The trouble with doing this is that an apparently-constant subquery output column isn't really constant if it is a grouping column that appears in only some of the grouping sets. A qual using such a column would be subject to incorrect const-folding after push-down, as seen in bug #16585 from Paul Sivash. To fix, just disable qual pushdown altogether if the sub-query has nonempty groupingSets. While we could imagine far less restrictive solutions, there is not much point in working harder right now, because subquery_planner() won't move HAVING clauses to WHERE within such a subquery. If the qual stays in HAVING it's not going to be a lot more useful than if we'd kept it at the outer level. Having said that, this restriction could be removed if we used a parsetree representation that distinguished such outputs from actual constants, which is something I hope to do in future. Hence, make the patch a minimal addition rather than integrating it more tightly (e.g. by renumbering the existing items in subquery_is_pushdown_safe's comment). Back-patch to 9.5 where grouping sets were introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16585-9d8c340d23ade8c1@postgresql.org
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src/sgml/gist.sgml')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions