Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
9 daysAllow larger packets during GSSAPI authentication exchange.Tom Lane
Our GSSAPI code only allows packet sizes up to 16kB. However it emerges that during authentication, larger packets might be needed; various authorities suggest 48kB or 64kB as the maximum packet size. This limitation caused login failure for AD users who belong to many AD groups. To add insult to injury, we gave an unintelligible error message, typically "GSSAPI context establishment error: The routine must be called again to complete its function: Unknown error". As noted in code comments, the 16kB packet limit is effectively a protocol constant once we are doing normal data transmission: the GSSAPI code splits the data stream at those points, and if we change the limit then we will have cross-version compatibility problems due to the receiver's buffer being too small in some combinations. However, during the authentication exchange the packet sizes are not determined by us, but by the underlying GSSAPI library. So we might as well just try to send what the library tells us to. An unpatched recipient will fail on a packet larger than 16kB, but that's not worse than the sender failing without even trying. So this doesn't introduce any meaningful compatibility problem. We still need a buffer size limit, but we can easily make it be 64kB rather than 16kB until transport negotiation is complete. (Larger values were discussed, but don't seem likely to add anything.) Reported-by: Chris Gooch <cgooch@bamfunds.com> Fix-suggested-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DS0PR22MB5971A9C8A3F44BCC6293C4DABE99A@DS0PR22MB5971.namprd22.prod.outlook.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-05-09Add support for runtime arguments in injection pointsMichael Paquier
The macros INJECTION_POINT() and INJECTION_POINT_CACHED() are extended with an optional argument that can be passed down to the callback attached when an injection point is run, giving to callbacks the possibility to manipulate a stack state given by the caller. The existing callbacks in modules injection_points and test_aio have their declarations adjusted based on that. da7226993fd4 (core AIO infrastructure) and 93bc3d75d8e1 (test_aio) and been relying on a set of workarounds where a static variable called pgaio_inj_cur_handle is used as runtime argument in the injection point callbacks used by the AIO tests, in combination with a TRY/CATCH block to reset the argument value. The infrastructure introduced in this commit will be reused for the AIO tests, simplifying them. Reviewed-by: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z_y9TtnXubvYAApS@paquier.xyz
2025-02-12Remove unnecessary (char *) casts [mem]Peter Eisentraut
Remove (char *) casts around memory functions such as memcmp(), memcpy(), or memset() where the cast is useless. Since these functions don't take char * arguments anyway, these casts are at best complicated casts to (void *), about which see commit 7f798aca1d5. Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fd1fcedb-3492-4fc8-9e3e-74b97f2db6c7%40eisentraut.org
2025-02-09Make TLS write functions' buffer arguments pointers constPeter Eisentraut
This also makes it match the equivalent APIs in libpq. Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fd1fcedb-3492-4fc8-9e3e-74b97f2db6c7%40eisentraut.org
2025-01-01Update copyright for 2025Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 13
2024-10-27Remove unused #include's from backend .c filesPeter Eisentraut
as determined by IWYU These are mostly issues that are new since commit dbbca2cf299. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0df1d5b1-8ca8-4f84-93be-121081bde049%40eisentraut.org
2024-10-05Clean up WaitLatch calls that passed latch without WL_LATCH_SETHeikki Linnakangas
The 'latch' argument is ignored if WL_LATCH_SET is not given. Clarify these calls by not pointlessly passing MyLatch. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/391abe21-413e-4d91-a650-b663af49500c@iki.fi
2024-07-26Add tests for errors during SSL or GSSAPI handshakeHeikki Linnakangas
These test that libpq correctly falls back to a plaintext connection on handshake error, in the "prefer" modes. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOYmi%2Bnwvu21mJ4DYKUa98HdfM_KZJi7B1MhyXtnsyOO-PB6Ww%40mail.gmail.com
2024-01-04Update copyright for 2024Bruce Momjian
Reported-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 12
2023-11-23Fix timing-dependent failure in GSSAPI data transmission.Tom Lane
When using GSSAPI encryption in non-blocking mode, libpq sometimes failed with "GSSAPI caller failed to retransmit all data needing to be retried". The cause is that pqPutMsgEnd rounds its transmit request down to an even multiple of 8K, and sometimes that can lead to not requesting a write of data that was requested to be written (but reported as not written) earlier. That can upset pg_GSS_write's logic for dealing with not-yet-written data, since it's possible the data in question had already been incorporated into an encrypted packet that we weren't able to send during the previous call. We could fix this with a one-or-two-line hack to disable pqPutMsgEnd's round-down behavior, but that seems like making the caller work around a behavior that pg_GSS_write shouldn't expose in this way. Instead, adjust pg_GSS_write to never report a partial write: it either reports a complete write, or reflects the failure of the lower-level pqsecure_raw_write call. The requirement still exists for the caller to present at least as much data as on the previous call, but with the caller-visible write start point not moving there is no temptation for it to present less. We lose some ability to reclaim buffer space early, but I doubt that that will make much difference in practice. This also gets rid of a rather dubious assumption that "any interesting failure condition (from pqsecure_raw_write) will recur on the next try". We've not seen failure reports traceable to that, but I've never trusted it particularly and am glad to remove it. Make the same adjustments to the equivalent backend routine be_gssapi_write(). It is probable that there's no bug on the backend side, since we don't have a notion of nonblock mode there; but we should keep the logic the same to ease future maintenance. Per bug #18210 from Lars Kanis. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18210-4c6d0b14627f2eb8@postgresql.org
2023-05-21rename "gss_accept_deleg" to "gss_accept_delegation".Bruce Momjian
This is more consistent with existing GUC spelling. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZGdnEsGtNj7+fZoa@momjian.us
2023-05-19Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.Tom Lane
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version 20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing code. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
2023-04-14NULL is not an ideal way to spell bool "false".Tom Lane
Thinko in commit 6633cfb21, detected by buildfarm member hamerkop.
2023-04-13Explicitly require MIT Kerberos for GSSAPIStephen Frost
WHen building with GSSAPI support, explicitly require MIT Kerberos and check for gssapi_ext.h in configure.ac and meson.build. Also add documentation explicitly stating that we now require MIT Kerberos when building with GSSAPI support. Reveiwed by: Johnathan Katz Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abcc73d0-acf7-6896-e0dc-f5bc12a61bb1@postgresql.org
2023-04-13De-Revert "Add support for Kerberos credential delegation"Stephen Frost
This reverts commit 3d03b24c3 (Revert Add support for Kerberos credential delegation) which was committed on the grounds of concern about portability, but on further review and discussion, it's clear that we are better off explicitly requiring MIT Kerberos as that appears to be the only GSSAPI library currently that's under proper maintenance and ongoing development. The API used for storing credentials was added to MIT Kerberos over a decade ago while for the other libraries which appear to be mainly based on Heimdal, which exists explicitly to be a re-implementation of MIT Kerberos, the API never made it to a released version (even though it was added to the Heimdal git repo over 5 years ago..). This post-feature-freeze change was approved by the RMT. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZDDO6jaESKaBgej0%40tamriel.snowman.net
2023-04-08Revert "Add support for Kerberos credential delegation"Stephen Frost
This reverts commit 3d4fa227bce4294ce1cc214b4a9d3b7caa3f0454. Per discussion and buildfarm, this depends on APIs that seem to not be available on at least one platform (NetBSD). Should be certainly possible to rework to be optional on that platform if necessary but bit late for that at this point. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3286097.1680922218@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-04-08Add support for Kerberos credential delegationStephen Frost
Support GSSAPI/Kerberos credentials being delegated to the server by a client. With this, a user authenticating to PostgreSQL using Kerberos (GSSAPI) credentials can choose to delegate their credentials to the PostgreSQL server (which can choose to accept them, or not), allowing the server to then use those delegated credentials to connect to another service, such as with postgres_fdw or dblink or theoretically any other service which is able to be authenticated using Kerberos. Both postgres_fdw and dblink are changed to allow non-superuser password-less connections but only when GSSAPI credentials have been delegated to the server by the client and GSSAPI is used to authenticate to the remote system. Authors: Stephen Frost, Peifeng Qiu Reviewed-By: David Christensen Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CO1PR05MB8023CC2CB575E0FAAD7DF4F8A8E29@CO1PR05MB8023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
2023-01-02Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 11
2022-01-08Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 10
2021-01-02Update copyright for 2021Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2020-12-30Fix up usage of krb_server_keyfile GUC parameter.Tom Lane
secure_open_gssapi() installed the krb_server_keyfile setting as KRB5_KTNAME unconditionally, so long as it's not empty. However, pg_GSS_recvauth() only installed it if KRB5_KTNAME wasn't set already, leading to a troubling inconsistency: in theory, clients could see different sets of server principal names depending on whether they use GSSAPI encryption. Always using krb_server_keyfile seems like the right thing, so make both places do that. Also fix up secure_open_gssapi()'s lack of a check for setenv() failure --- it's unlikely, surely, but security-critical actions are no place to be sloppy. Also improve the associated documentation. This patch does nothing about secure_open_gssapi()'s use of setenv(), and indeed causes pg_GSS_recvauth() to use it too. That's nominally against project portability rules, but since this code is only built with --with-gssapi, I do not feel a need to do something about this in the back branches. A fix will be forthcoming for HEAD though. Back-patch to v12 where GSSAPI encryption was introduced. The dubious behavior in pg_GSS_recvauth() goes back further, but it didn't have anything to be inconsistent with, so let it be. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2187460.1609263156@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-12-28Fix assorted issues in backend's GSSAPI encryption support.Tom Lane
Unrecoverable errors detected by GSSAPI encryption can't just be reported with elog(ERROR) or elog(FATAL), because attempting to send the error report to the client is likely to lead to infinite recursion or loss of protocol sync. Instead make this code do what the SSL encryption code has long done, which is to just report any such failure to the server log (with elevel COMMERROR), then pretend we've lost the connection by returning errno = ECONNRESET. Along the way, fix confusion about whether message translation is done by pg_GSS_error() or its callers (the latter should do it), and make the backend version of that function work more like the frontend version. Avoid allocating the port->gss struct until it's needed; we surely don't need to allocate it in the postmaster. Improve logging of "connection authorized" messages with GSS enabled. (As part of this, I back-patched the code changes from dc11f31a1.) Make BackendStatusShmemSize() account for the GSS-related space that will be allocated by CreateSharedBackendStatus(). This omission could possibly cause out-of-shared-memory problems with very high max_connections settings. Remove arbitrary, pointless restriction that only GSS authentication can be used on a GSS-encrypted connection. Improve documentation; notably, document the fact that libpq now prefers GSS encryption over SSL encryption if both are possible. Per report from Mikael Gustavsson. Back-patch to v12 where this code was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e5b0b6ed05764324a2f3fe7acfc766d5@smhi.se
2020-10-15Replace calls of htonl()/ntohl() with pg_bswap.h for GSSAPI encryptionMichael Paquier
The in-core equivalents can make use of built-in functions if the compiler supports this option, making optimizations possible. 0ba99c8 replaced all existing calls in the code base at this time, but b0b39f7 (GSSAPI encryption) has forgotten to do the switch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201014055303.GG3349@paquier.xyz
2020-05-05Fix severe memory leaks in GSSAPI encryption support.Tom Lane
Both the backend and libpq leaked buffers containing encrypted data to be transmitted, so that the process size would grow roughly as the total amount of data sent. There were also far-less-critical leaks of the same sort in GSSAPI session establishment. Oversight in commit b0b39f72b, which I failed to notice while reviewing the code in 2c0cdc818. Per complaint from pmc@citylink. Back-patch to v12 where this code was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200504115649.GA77072@gate.oper.dinoex.org
2020-01-11Extensive code review for GSSAPI encryption mechanism.Tom Lane
Fix assorted bugs in handling of non-blocking I/O when using GSSAPI encryption. The encryption layer could return the wrong status information to its caller, resulting in effectively dropping some data (or possibly in aborting a not-broken connection), or in a "livelock" situation where data remains to be sent but the upper layers think transmission is done and just go to sleep. There were multiple small thinkos contributing to that, as well as one big one (failure to think through what to do when a send fails after having already transmitted data). Note that these errors could cause failures whether the client application asked for non-blocking I/O or not, since both libpq and the backend always run things in non-block mode at this level. Also get rid of use of static variables for GSSAPI inside libpq; that's entirely not okay given that multiple connections could be open at once inside a single client process. Also adjust a bunch of random small discrepancies between the frontend and backend versions of the send/receive functions -- except for error handling, they should be identical, and now they are. Also extend the Kerberos TAP tests to exercise cases where nontrivial amounts of data need to be pushed through encryption. Before, those tests didn't provide any useful coverage at all for the cases of interest here. (They still might not, depending on timing, but at least there's a chance.) Per complaint from pmc@citylink and subsequent investigation. Back-patch to v12 where this code was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200109181822.GA74698@gate.oper.dinoex.org
2020-01-01Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
2019-09-19GSSAPI error message improvementsPeter Eisentraut
Make the error messages around GSSAPI encryption a bit clearer. Tweak some messages to avoid plural problems. Also make a code change for clarity. Using "conf" for "confidential" is quite confusing. Using "conf_state" is perhaps not much better but that's what the GSSAPI documentation uses, so there is at least some hope of understanding it.
2019-06-29Remove unnecessary header from be-secure-gssapi.cMichael Paquier
libpq/libpq-be.h is included by libpq/libpq.h so there is no need to explicitly include it separately. Author: Daniel Gustafsson Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/A4852E46-9ED1-4861-A23B-22A83E34A084@yesql.se
2019-06-14Fix typos and inconsistencies in code commentsMichael Paquier
Author: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dec6aae8-2d63-639f-4d50-20e229fb83e3@gmail.com
2019-06-08Move be-gssapi-common.h into src/include/libpq/Michael Paquier
The file has been introduced in src/backend/libpq/ as of b0b39f72, but all backend-side headers of libpq are located in src/include/libpq/. Note that the identification path on top of the file referred to src/include/libpq/ from the start. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Stephen Frost Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190607043415.GE1736@paquier.xyz
2019-05-24Update copyright year.Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJFWXmtYo6Frd77RR8YXCHz7hJ2mRy5aHV%3D7fJOqDnBHA%40mail.gmail.com
2019-04-17Fix assorted minor bogosity in GSSAPI transport error messages.Tom Lane
I noted that some buildfarm members were complaining about %ld being used to format values that are (probably) declared size_t. Use %zu instead, and insert a cast just in case some versions of the GSSAPI API declare the length field differently. While at it, clean up gratuitous differences in wording of equivalent messages, show the complained-of length in all relevant messages not just some, include trailing newline where needed, adjust random deviations from project-standard code layout and message style, etc.
2019-04-03GSSAPI encryption supportStephen Frost
On both the frontend and backend, prepare for GSSAPI encryption support by moving common code for error handling into a separate file. Fix a TODO for handling multiple status messages in the process. Eliminate the OIDs, which have not been needed for some time. Add frontend and backend encryption support functions. Keep the context initiation for authentication-only separate on both the frontend and backend in order to avoid concerns about changing the requested flags to include encryption support. In postmaster, pull GSSAPI authorization checking into a shared function. Also share the initiator name between the encryption and non-encryption codepaths. For HBA, add "hostgssenc" and "hostnogssenc" entries that behave similarly to their SSL counterparts. "hostgssenc" requires either "gss", "trust", or "reject" for its authentication. Similarly, add a "gssencmode" parameter to libpq. Supported values are "disable", "require", and "prefer". Notably, negotiation will only be attempted if credentials can be acquired. Move credential acquisition into its own function to support this behavior. Add a simple pg_stat_gssapi view similar to pg_stat_ssl, for monitoring if GSSAPI authentication was used, what principal was used, and if encryption is being used on the connection. Finally, add documentation for everything new, and update existing documentation on connection security. Thanks to Michael Paquier for the Windows fixes. Author: Robbie Harwood, with changes to the read/write functions by me. Reviewed in various forms and at different times by: Michael Paquier, Andres Freund, David Steele. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/jlg1tgq1ktm.fsf@thriss.redhat.com