| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The algorithm to squash lists of constants added by commit 62d712ecfd94
was a bit too simplistic; we wanted to avoid adding unnecessary
complexity, but cases like direct function calls of typecasting
functions (and others) were missed, and bogus SQL syntax was being shown
in pg_stat_statements normalized query text field. To fix normalization
for those cases, we need the parser to transmit information about were
each list of constant values starts and ends, so add that to a couple of
nodes. Also add a few more test cases to make sure we're doing the
right thing.
The patch initially submitted by Sami added a new private struct in
gram.y to carry the start/end information for A_Expr, but I (Álvaro)
decided that a better fix was to remove the parser indirection via the
in_expr production, and instead create separate components in the a_expr
rule. I'm surprised that this works and doesn't require more changes,
but I assume (without checking) that the grammar used to be more complex
and got simplified at some point.
Bump catversion.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Author: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0tRXoPG2y6bMgBCWNDt0Tn=unRerbzYM=oW0syi1=C1OA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
uint64 was perhaps chosen in cff440d36 as the type was uint32 prior to
that widening work.
Having this as uint64 doesn't make much sense and just adds the overhead of
having to remember that we always output this in its signed form. Let's
remove that overhead.
The signed form output is seemingly required since we have no way to
represent the full range of uint64 in an SQL type. We use BIGINT in places
like pg_stat_statements, which maps directly to int64.
The release notes "Source Code" section may want to mention this
adjustment as some extensions may wish to adjust their code.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/50cb0c8b-994b-48f9-a1c4-13039eb3536b@eisentraut.org
|
|
The large majority of these have been introduced by recent commits done
in the v18 development cycle.
Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9a7763ab-5252-429d-a943-b28941e0e28b@gmail.com
|
|
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in a few places. These
inconsistencies were all introduced during Postgres 18 development.
This commit was written with help from clang-tidy, by mechanically
applying the same rules as similar clean-up commits (the earliest such
commit was commit 035ce1fe).
|
|
Commit 62d712ecfd94 introduced the capability to calculate the same
queryId for queries with different lengths of constants in a list for an
IN clause. This behavior was originally enabled with a GUC
query_id_squash_values. After a discussion about the value of such a
GUC, it was decided to back out of the use of a GUC and make the
squashing behavior the only available option.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z-LZyygkkNyA8-kR@msg.df7cb.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcVTK-3C-8NWV1oY2NZrvtnMCDqnyYYyk1T7WMUG65MeOQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
f31aad9b0 adjusted query jumbling so it no longer ignores NULL nodes
during the jumble. This added some overhead. Here we tune a few
things to make jumbling faster again. This makes jumbling perform
similar or even slightly faster than prior to that change.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvreP04nhTKuYsPw0F-YN+4nr4f=L72SPeFb81jfv+2c7w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Previously NULL nodes were ignored. This could cause issues where the
computed query ID could match for queries where fields that are next to
each other in their Node struct where one field was NULL and the other
non-NULL. For example, the Query struct had distinctClause and sortClause
next to each other. If someone wrote;
SELECT DISTINCT c1 FROM t;
and then;
SELECT c1 FROM t ORDER BY c1;
these would produce the same query ID since, in the first query, we
ignored the NULL sortClause and appended the jumble bytes for the
distictClause. In the latter query, since we did nothing for the NULL
distinctClause then jumble the non-NULL sortClause, and since the node
representation stored is the same in both cases, the query IDs were
identical.
Here we fix this by always accounting for NULL nodes by recording that
we saw a NULL in the jumble buffer. This fixes the issue as the order that
the NULL is recorded isn't the same in the above two queries.
Author: Bykov Ivan <i.bykov@modernsys.ru>
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aafce7966e234372b2ba876c0193f1e9%40localhost.localdomain
|
|
custom_query_jumble (introduced in 5ac462e2b7ac as a node field
attribute) is now assigned to the expanded reference name "eref" of
RangeTblEntry, adding in the query jumble computation the non-qualified
aliased relation name, without the list of column names. The relation
OID is removed from the query jumbling.
The effects of this change can be seen in the tests added by
3430215fe35f, where pg_stat_statements (PGSS) entries are now grouped
using the relation name, ignoring the relation search_path may point at.
For example, these two relations are different, but are now grouped in a
single PGSS entry as they are assigned the same query ID:
CREATE TABLE foo1.tab (a int);
CREATE TABLE foo2.tab (b int);
SET search_path = 'foo1';
SELECT count(*) FROM tab;
SET search_path = 'foo2';
SELECT count(*) FROM tab;
SELECT count(*) FROM foo1.tab;
SELECT count(*) FROM foo2.tab;
SELECT query, calls FROM pg_stat_statements WHERE query ~ 'FROM tab';
query | calls
--------------------------+-------
SELECT count(*) FROM tab | 4
(1 row)
It is still possible to use an alias in the FROM clause to split these.
This behavior is useful for relations re-created with the same name,
where queries based on such relations would be grouped in the same
PGSS entry. For permanent schemas, it should not really matter in
practice. The main benefit is for workloads that use a lot of temporary
relations, which are usually re-created with the same name continuously.
These can be a heavy source of bloat in PGSS depending on the workload.
Such entries can now be grouped together, improving the user experience.
The original idea from Christoph Berg used catalog lookups to find
temporary relations, something that the query jumble has never done, and
it could cause some performance regressions. The idea to use
RangeTblEntry.eref and the relation name, applying the same rules for
all relations, temporary and not temporary, has been proposed by Tom
Lane. The documentation additions have been suggested by Sami Imseih.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z9iWXKGwkm8RAC93@msg.df7cb.de
|
|
This option gives the possibility for query jumble to define a custom
routine for the field of a Node, extending support for
custom_query_jumble as a node field attribute. When dealing with
complex node structures, this can be simpler than having to enforce a
custom function across a full node.
Custom functions need to be defined in queryjumblefuncs.c, named as
_jumble${node}_${field}(), and use in input the JumbleState, the node
and its field. The field is not really required if we have the Node,
but it makes custom implementations somewhat easier to think about. The
code generated by gen_node_support.pl uses a macro called
JUMBLE_CUSTOM(), hiding the internals of the logic inside
queryjumblefuncs.c.
This will be used by an upcoming patch manipulating adding a custom
routine into a field of RangeTblEntry, but this facility can become
useful in more cases.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z9y43-dRvb4EtxQ0@paquier.xyz
|
|
pg_stat_statements produces multiple entries for queries like
SELECT something FROM table WHERE col IN (1, 2, 3, ...)
depending on the number of parameters, because every element of
ArrayExpr is individually jumbled. Most of the time that's undesirable,
especially if the list becomes too large.
Fix this by introducing a new GUC query_id_squash_values which modifies
the node jumbling code to only consider the first and last element of a
list of constants, rather than each list element individually. This
affects both the query_id generated by query jumbling, as well as
pg_stat_statements query normalization so that it suppresses printing of
the individual elements of such a list.
The default value is off, meaning the previous behavior is maintained.
Author: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Dudoladov (mysterious, off-list)
Reviewed-by: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
Tested-by: Yasuo Honda <yasuo.honda@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>
Tested-by: Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chengxi Sun <sunchengxi@highgo.com>
Tested-by: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcWtUbT_Sxj0V6HY6EZ89uv5wuG5aefpe_9n0Jr3VwntFg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Up to now, the parser's reporting of a statement's stmt_location
included any preceding whitespace or comments. This isn't really
desirable but was done to avoid accounting honestly for nonterminals
that reduce to empty. It causes problems for pg_stat_statements,
which partially compensates by manually stripping whitespace, but
is not bright enough to strip /*-style comments. There will be
more problems with an upcoming patch to improve reporting of errors
in extension scripts, so it's time to do something about this.
The thing we have to do to make it work right is to adjust
YYLLOC_DEFAULT to scan the inputs of each production to find the
first one that has a valid location (i.e., did not reduce to
empty). In theory this adds a little bit of per-reduction overhead,
but in practice it's negligible. I checked by measuring the time
to run raw_parser() on the contents of information_schema.sql, and
there was basically no change.
Having done that, we can rely on any nonterminal that didn't reduce
to completely empty to have a correct starting location, and we don't
need the kluges the stmtmulti production formerly used.
This should have a side benefit of allowing parse error reports to
include an error position in some cases where they formerly failed to
do so, due to trying to report the position of an empty nonterminal.
I did not go looking for an example though. The one previously known
case where that could happen (OptSchemaEltList) no longer needs the
kluge it had; but I rather doubt that that was the only case.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZvV1ClhnbJLCz7Sm@msg.df7cb.de
|
|
This is a continuation of work like 11c34b342bd7, done to reduce the
bloat of pg_stat_statements by applying more normalization to query
entries. This commit is able to detect and normalize values in
VariableSetStmt, resulting in:
SET conf_param = $1
Compared to other parse nodes, VariableSetStmt is embedded in much more
places in the parser, impacting many query patterns in
pg_stat_statements. A custom jumble function is used, with an extra
field in the node to decide if arguments should be included in the
jumbling or not, a location field being not enough for this purpose.
This approach allows for a finer tuning.
Clauses relying on one or more keywords are not normalized, for example:
* DEFAULT
* FROM CURRENT
* List of keywords. SET SESSION CHARACTERISTICS AS TRANSACTION,
where it is critical to differentiate different sets of options, is a
good example of why normalization should not happen.
Some queries use VariableSetStmt for some subclauses with SET, that also
have their values normalized:
- ALTER DATABASE
- ALTER ROLE
- ALTER SYSTEM
- CREATE/ALTER FUNCTION
ba90eac7a995 has added test coverage for most of the existing SET
patterns. The expected output of these tests shows the difference this
commit creates. Normalization could be perhaps applied to more portions
of the grammar but what is done here is conservative, and good enough as
a starting point.
Author: Greg Sabino Mullane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/36e5bffe-e989-194f-85c8-06e7bc88e6f7@amazon.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B44FA29D-EBD0-4DD9-ABC2-16F1CB087074@amazon.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmJtJY2jzQN91=2QAD2eAJAA-Per61eyO48-TyxEg-q0Rg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ae9f2fcb-4b24-5bb0-4240-efbbbd944ca1@gmail.com
|
|
This commit reverts 72bd38cc99 due to implementation and design issues.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3604469.1712628736%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Replace (expr op C1) OR (expr op C2) ... with expr op ANY(ARRAY[C1, C2, ...])
on the preliminary stage of optimization when we are still working with the
expression tree.
Here Cn is a n-th constant expression, 'expr' is non-constant expression, 'op'
is an operator which returns boolean result and has a commuter (for the case
of reverse order of constant and non-constant parts of the expression,
like 'Cn op expr').
Sometimes it can lead to not optimal plan. This is why there is a
or_to_any_transform_limit GUC. It specifies a threshold value of length of
arguments in an OR expression that triggers the OR-to-ANY transformation.
Generally, more groupable OR arguments mean that transformation will be more
likely to win than to lose.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/567ED6CA.2040504%40sigaev.ru
Author: Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>
Author: Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-by: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
|
|
This is part of an effort to reduce the number of special cases in the
automatically generated node support functions.
This patch removes _jumbleRangeTblEntry() and instead adds per-field
query_jumble_ignore annotations to match the behavior of the previous
custom code. The pg_stat_statements test suite has some coverage of
this. It gets rid of the switch on rtekind; this should be
technically correct, since we do the equal and copy functions like
this also.
The list of fields to jumble has been checked and is considered
correct as of 8b29a119fd.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4b27fc50-8cd6-46f5-ab20-88dbaadca645@eisentraut.org
|
|
The inh field of RangeTblEntry was doubly confusingly documented.
Some parts of the code insisted that it was only valid for
RTE_RELATION entries, other parts said the field was valid for all
entries. Neither was quite correct. More correctly, the field is
valid for RTE_RELATION entries but is also used in the planner for
RTE_SUBQUERY entries. So it makes more sense to group it with other
fields that are primarily for RTE_RELATION but borrowed by
RTE_SUBQUERY. (The exact position was chosen so that it is next to
relkind for better struct packing, and next to relid, since relid and
inh are sort of the input fields and the others are filled in later.)
Also add documentation for the planner's use at the struct definition.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6c1fbccc-85c8-40d3-b08b-4f47f2093711@eisentraut.org
|
|
RangeTblEntry.funcordinality should be jumbled, because the WITH
ORDINALITY clause changes the query result.
This was apparently an oversight in the past.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d7f421f8-fd6d-4759-adc3-247090a5d44b%40eisentraut.org
|
|
The comment was inexact because query_id_enabled will not be switched to
"true" even if compute_query_id is "on", unless a module requests for
it.
While on it, this adds a comment to mention that IsQueryIdEnabled()
should be used to check if query ID computation is enabled or not.
Author: Yugo Nagata
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240209153823.e29a68cadb14225f1362a2cf@sraoss.co.jp
|
|
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Since 3db72eb, the query ID of utilities is generated using the Query
structure, making the use of the query string in JumbleQuery()
unnecessary. This commit removes the argument "querytext" from
JumbleQuery().
Reported-by: Joe Conway
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZJlQAWE4COFqHuAV@paquier.xyz
|
|
Like the implementation for node copy, write and read, this node
requires a custom implementation so as the query jumbling is able to
consider the correct value assigned to it, depending on its type (int,
float, bool, string, bitstring).
Based on a dump of pg_stat_statements from the regression database, this
would confuse the query jumbling of the following queries:
- SET.
- COPY TO with SELECT queries.
- START TRANSACTION with different isolation levels.
- ALTER TABLE with default expressions.
- CREATE TABLE with partition bounds.
Note that there may be a long-term argument in tracking the location of
such nodes so as query strings holding such nodes could be normalized,
but this is left as a separate discussion.
Oversight in 3db72eb.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y9+HuYslMAP6yyPb@paquier.xyz
|
|
This commit changes the query jumbling code in queryjumblefuncs.c to be
generated automatically based on the information of the nodes in the
headers of src/include/nodes/ by using gen_node_support.pl. This
approach offers many advantages:
- Support for query jumbling for all the utility statements, based on the
state of their parsed Nodes and not only their query string. This will
greatly ease the switch to normalize the information of some DDLs, like
SET or CALL for example (this is left unchanged and should be part of a
separate discussion). With this feature, the number of entries stored
for utilities in pg_stat_statements is reduced (for example now
"CHECKPOINT" and "checkpoint" mean the same thing with the same query
ID).
- Documentation of query jumbling directly in the structure definition
of the nodes. Since this code has been introduced in pg_stat_statements
and then moved to code, the reasons behind the choices of what should be
included in the jumble are rather sparse. Note that some explanation is
added for the most relevant parts, as a start.
- Overall code reduction and more consistency with the other parts
generating read, write and copy depending on the nodes.
The query jumbling is controlled by a couple of new node attributes,
documented in nodes/nodes.h:
- custom_query_jumble, to mark a Node as having a custom
implementation.
- no_query_jumble, to ignore entirely a Node.
- query_jumble_ignore, to ignore a field in a Node.
- query_jumble_location, to mark a location in a Node, for
normalization. This can apply only to int fields, with "location" in
their name (only Const as of this commit).
There should be no compatibility impact on pg_stat_statements, as the
new code applies the jumbling to the same fields for each node (its
regression tests have no modification, for one).
Some benchmark of the query jumbling between HEAD and this commit for
SELECT and DMLs has proved that this new code does not cause a
performance regression, with computation times close for both methods.
For utility queries, the new method is slower than the previous method
of calculating a hash of the query string, though we are talking about
extra ns-level changes based on what I measured, which is unnoticeable
even for OLTP workloads as a query ID is calculated once per query
post-parse analysis.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y5BHOUhX3zTH/ig6@paquier.xyz
|
|
Traditionally we used the same Var struct to represent the value
of a table column everywhere in parse and plan trees. This choice
predates our support for SQL outer joins, and it's really a pretty
bad idea with outer joins, because the Var's value can depend on
where it is in the tree: it might go to NULL above an outer join.
So expression nodes that are equal() per equalfuncs.c might not
represent the same value, which is a huge correctness hazard for
the planner.
To improve this, decorate Var nodes with a bitmapset showing
which outer joins (identified by RTE indexes) may have nulled
them at the point in the parse tree where the Var appears.
This allows us to trust that equal() Vars represent the same value.
A certain amount of klugery is still needed to cope with cases
where we re-order two outer joins, but it's possible to make it
work without sacrificing that core principle. PlaceHolderVars
receive similar decoration for the same reason.
In the planner, we include these outer join bitmapsets into the relids
that an expression is considered to depend on, and in consequence also
add outer-join relids to the relids of join RelOptInfos. This allows
us to correctly perceive whether an expression can be calculated above
or below a particular outer join.
This change affects FDWs that want to plan foreign joins. They *must*
follow suit when labeling foreign joins in order to match with the
core planner, but for many purposes (if postgres_fdw is any guide)
they'd prefer to consider only base relations within the join.
To support both requirements, redefine ForeignScan.fs_relids as
base+OJ relids, and add a new field fs_base_relids that's set up by
the core planner.
Large though it is, this commit just does the minimum necessary to
install the new mechanisms and get check-world passing again.
Follow-up patches will perform some cleanup. (The README additions
and comments mention some stuff that will appear in the follow-up.)
Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/830269.1656693747@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This will ease a follow-up move that will generate automatically this
code. The C file is renamed, for consistency with the node-related
files whose code are generated by gen_node_support.pl:
- queryjumble.c -> queryjumblefuncs.c
- utils/queryjumble.h -> nodes/queryjumble.h
Per a suggestion from Peter Eisentraut.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y5BHOUhX3zTH/ig6@paquier.xyz
|
