| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Similar to commit 7e735035f20.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs4-WhpCFMbXCjtJ%2BFzmjfPrp7Hw1pk4p%2BZpU95Kh3ofZ1A%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Fix one place that was using lfirst(list_head(list)) by using linitial(list)
instead. They are equivalent but the latter is simpler. We did the same in
9d299a49.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs49dJnpezDQDDxCPKq7+=_3NyqLqGqnhqCjd+dYe4MS15w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 11
|
|
This function looks for a reference to the recursive WITH CTE,
but it checked only the CTE name not ctelevelsup, so that it could
seize on a lower CTE that happened to have the same name. This
would result in planner failures later, either weird errors such as
"could not find attribute 2 in subquery targetlist", or crashes
or assertion failures. The code also merely Assert'ed that it found
a matching entry, which is not guaranteed at all by the parser.
Per bugs #17320 and #17318 from Zhiyong Wu.
Thanks to Kyotaro Horiguchi for investigation.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17320-70e37868182512ab@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17318-2eb65a3a611d2368@postgresql.org
|
|
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
Commit 01e658fa74 added hash support for row types. This also added
support for hashing anonymous record types, using the same approach
that the type cache uses for comparison support for record types: It
just reports that it works, but it might fail at run time if a
component type doesn't actually support the operation. We get away
with that for comparison because most types support that. But some
types don't support hashing, so the current state can result in
failures at run time where the planner chooses hashing over sorting,
whereas that previously worked if only sorting was an option.
We do, however, want the record hashing support for path tracking in
recursive unions, and the SEARCH and CYCLE clauses built on that. In
that case, hashing is the only plan option. So enable that, this
commit implements the following approach: The type cache does not
report that hashing is available for the record type. This undoes
that part of 01e658fa74. Instead, callers that require hashing no
matter what can override that result themselves. This patch only
touches the callers to make the aforementioned recursive query cases
work, namely the parse analysis of unions, as well as the hash_array()
function.
Reported-by: Sait Talha Nisanci <sait.nisanci@microsoft.com>
Bug: #17158
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/17158-8a2ba823982537a4%40postgresql.org
|
|
Instead of castNode(…, lfoo(…))
Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87eecahraj.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
|
|
A few patches committed after ca3b37487 mistakenly forgot to make the
copyright year 2021. Fix these.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqyLmd9P2oBQYJ=DbrV8QwyPRdmXtCTFYPE08h+ip0UJw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210416070310.GG3315@telsasoft.com
|
|
This adds the SQL standard feature that adds the SEARCH and CYCLE
clauses to recursive queries to be able to do produce breadth- or
depth-first search orders and detect cycles. These clauses can be
rewritten into queries using existing syntax, and that is what this
patch does in the rewriter.
Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/db80ceee-6f97-9b4a-8ee8-3ba0c58e5be2@2ndquadrant.com
|
