Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content

Fixing CI failures#12789

Open
vishesh92 wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:4.22from
shapeblue:fix-ci-failures
Open

Fixing CI failures#12789
vishesh92 wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:4.22from
shapeblue:fix-ci-failures

Conversation

@vishesh92
Copy link
Member

@vishesh92 vishesh92 commented Mar 11, 2026

Description

This PR fixes CI failures

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.61%. Comparing base (7aa0558) to head (df72d04).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...storage/datastore/db/SnapshotDataStoreDaoImpl.java 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.22   #12789   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     17.61%   17.61%           
- Complexity    15664    15665    +1     
=========================================
  Files          5917     5917           
  Lines        531402   531402           
  Branches      64971    64971           
=========================================
  Hits          93596    93596           
  Misses       427252   427252           
  Partials      10554    10554           
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.70% <ø> (ø)
unittests 18.68% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@sureshanaparti
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17095

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member

great, only 1 CI failure now

@vishesh92
Copy link
Member Author

great, only 1 CI failure now

Looks it is intermittent. Let me push the fix to make it more reliable.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added component:integration-test Python Warning... Python code Ahead! labels Mar 11, 2026
@vishesh92
Copy link
Member Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17100

@weizhouapache
Copy link
Member

@blueorangutan test

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

@DaanHoogland
Copy link
Contributor

@blueorangutan test matrix

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (EL8 mgmt + EL8 KVM, Ubuntu22 mgmt + Ubuntu22 KVM, EL8 mgmt + VMware 7.0u3, EL9 mgmt + XCP-ng 8.2 ) has been kicked to run smoke tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants