Change more places to be less trusting of RestrictInfo.is_pushed_down.

tglsfdc · tglsfdc · commit 64ad85860ce6 · 2018-04-20T15:19:17.000-04:00
On further reflection, commit e5d8399 didn't go far enough: pretty much everywhere in the planner that examines a clause's is_pushed_down flag ought to be changed to use the more complicated behavior where we also check the clause's required_relids. Otherwise we could make incorrect decisions about whether, say, a clause is safe to use as a hash clause. Some (many?) of these places are safe as-is, either because they are never reached while considering a parameterized path, or because there are additional checks that would reject a pushed-down clause anyway. However, it seems smarter to just code them all the same way rather than rely on easily-broken reasoning of that sort. In support of that, invent a new macro RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN that should be used in place of direct tests on the is_pushed_down flag. Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static bool has_indexed_join_quals(NestPath *joinpath);
 static double approx_tuple_count(PlannerInfo *root, JoinPath *path,
 				   List *quals);
 static double calc_joinrel_size_estimate(PlannerInfo *root,
+						   RelOptInfo *joinrel,
 						   RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
 						   RelOptInfo *inner_rel,
 						   double outer_rows,
@@ -3542,13 +3543,15 @@ compute_semi_anti_join_factors(PlannerInfo *root,
 	 */
 	if (jointype == JOIN_ANTI)
 	{
+		Relids		joinrelids = bms_union(outerrel->relids, innerrel->relids);
+
 		joinquals = NIL;
 		foreach(l, restrictlist)
 		{
 			RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);
 
 			Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
-			if (!rinfo->is_pushed_down)
+			if (!RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrelids))
 				joinquals = lappend(joinquals, rinfo);
 		}
 	}
@@ -3863,6 +3866,7 @@ set_joinrel_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
 						   List *restrictlist)
 {
 	rel->rows = calc_joinrel_size_estimate(root,
+										   rel,
 										   outer_rel,
 										   inner_rel,
 										   outer_rel->rows,
@@ -3905,6 +3909,7 @@ get_parameterized_joinrel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
 	 * estimate for any pair with the same parameterization.
 	 */
 	nrows = calc_joinrel_size_estimate(root,
+									   rel,
 									   outer_path->parent,
 									   inner_path->parent,
 									   outer_path->rows,
@@ -3928,6 +3933,7 @@ get_parameterized_joinrel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel,
  */
 static double
 calc_joinrel_size_estimate(PlannerInfo *root,
+						   RelOptInfo *joinrel,
 						   RelOptInfo *outer_rel,
 						   RelOptInfo *inner_rel,
 						   double outer_rows,
@@ -3981,7 +3987,7 @@ calc_joinrel_size_estimate(PlannerInfo *root,
 			RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l);
 
 			Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
-			if (rinfo->is_pushed_down)
+			if (RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrel->relids))
 				pushedquals = lappend(pushedquals, rinfo);
 			else
 				joinquals = lappend(joinquals, rinfo);
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c
@@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ hash_inner_and_outer(PlannerInfo *root,
 		 * If processing an outer join, only use its own join clauses for
 		 * hashing.  For inner joins we need not be so picky.
 		 */
-		if (isouterjoin && restrictinfo->is_pushed_down)
+		if (isouterjoin && RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(restrictinfo, joinrel->relids))
 			continue;
 
 		if (!restrictinfo->can_join ||
@@ -1547,7 +1547,7 @@ select_mergejoin_clauses(PlannerInfo *root,
 		 * we don't set have_nonmergeable_joinclause here because pushed-down
 		 * clauses will become otherquals not joinquals.)
 		 */
-		if (isouterjoin && restrictinfo->is_pushed_down)
+		if (isouterjoin && RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(restrictinfo, joinrel->relids))
 			continue;
 
 		/* Check that clause is a mergeable operator clause */
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ static bool has_legal_joinclause(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel);
 static bool is_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel);
 static void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel);
 static bool restriction_is_constant_false(List *restrictlist,
+							  RelOptInfo *joinrel,
 							  bool only_pushed_down);
 
 
@@ -746,7 +747,7 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
 	{
 		case JOIN_INNER:
 			if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2) ||
-				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, false))
+				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, false))
 			{
 				mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
 				break;
@@ -760,12 +761,12 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
 			break;
 		case JOIN_LEFT:
 			if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) ||
-				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, true))
+				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, true))
 			{
 				mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
 				break;
 			}
-			if (restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, false) &&
+			if (restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, false) &&
 				bms_is_subset(rel2->relids, sjinfo->syn_righthand))
 				mark_dummy_rel(rel2);
 			add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
@@ -777,7 +778,7 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
 			break;
 		case JOIN_FULL:
 			if ((is_dummy_rel(rel1) && is_dummy_rel(rel2)) ||
-				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, true))
+				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, true))
 			{
 				mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
 				break;
@@ -813,7 +814,7 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
 				bms_is_subset(sjinfo->min_righthand, rel2->relids))
 			{
 				if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2) ||
-					restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, false))
+					restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, false))
 				{
 					mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
 					break;
@@ -836,7 +837,7 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
 								   sjinfo) != NULL)
 			{
 				if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) || is_dummy_rel(rel2) ||
-					restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, false))
+					restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, false))
 				{
 					mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
 					break;
@@ -851,12 +852,12 @@ make_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2)
 			break;
 		case JOIN_ANTI:
 			if (is_dummy_rel(rel1) ||
-				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, true))
+				restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, true))
 			{
 				mark_dummy_rel(joinrel);
 				break;
 			}
-			if (restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, false) &&
+			if (restriction_is_constant_false(restrictlist, joinrel, false) &&
 				bms_is_subset(rel2->relids, sjinfo->syn_righthand))
 				mark_dummy_rel(rel2);
 			add_paths_to_joinrel(root, joinrel, rel1, rel2,
@@ -1207,18 +1208,21 @@ mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel)
 
 
 /*
- * restriction_is_constant_false --- is a restrictlist just FALSE?
+ * restriction_is_constant_false --- is a restrictlist just false?
  *
- * In cases where a qual is provably constant FALSE, eval_const_expressions
+ * In cases where a qual is provably constant false, eval_const_expressions
  * will generally have thrown away anything that's ANDed with it.  In outer
  * join situations this will leave us computing cartesian products only to
  * decide there's no match for an outer row, which is pretty stupid.  So,
  * we need to detect the case.
  *
- * If only_pushed_down is TRUE, then consider only pushed-down quals.
+ * If only_pushed_down is true, then consider only quals that are pushed-down
+ * from the point of view of the joinrel.
  */
 static bool
-restriction_is_constant_false(List *restrictlist, bool only_pushed_down)
+restriction_is_constant_false(List *restrictlist,
+							  RelOptInfo *joinrel,
+							  bool only_pushed_down)
 {
 	ListCell   *lc;
 
@@ -1233,7 +1237,7 @@ restriction_is_constant_false(List *restrictlist, bool only_pushed_down)
 		RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc);
 
 		Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
-		if (only_pushed_down && !rinfo->is_pushed_down)
+		if (only_pushed_down && !RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrel->relids))
 			continue;
 
 		if (rinfo->clause && IsA(rinfo->clause, Const))
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c
@@ -248,8 +248,7 @@ join_is_removable(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo)
 		 * above the outer join, even if it references no other rels (it might
 		 * be from WHERE, for example).
 		 */
-		if (restrictinfo->is_pushed_down ||
-			!bms_equal(restrictinfo->required_relids, joinrelids))
+		if (RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(restrictinfo, joinrelids))
 		{
 			/*
 			 * If such a clause actually references the inner rel then join
@@ -417,8 +416,7 @@ remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids)
 
 		remove_join_clause_from_rels(root, rinfo, rinfo->required_relids);
 
-		if (rinfo->is_pushed_down ||
-			!bms_equal(rinfo->required_relids, joinrelids))
+		if (RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrelids))
 		{
 			/* Recheck that qual doesn't actually reference the target rel */
 			Assert(!bms_is_member(relid, rinfo->clause_relids));
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/initsplan.c
@@ -1676,6 +1676,11 @@ distribute_qual_to_rels(PlannerInfo *root, Node *clause,
 	 * attach quals to the lowest level where they can be evaluated.  But
 	 * if we were ever to re-introduce a mechanism for delaying evaluation
 	 * of "expensive" quals, this area would need work.
+	 *
+	 * Note: generally, use of is_pushed_down has to go through the macro
+	 * RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN, because that flag alone is not always sufficient
+	 * to tell whether a clause must be treated as pushed-down in context.
+	 * This seems like another reason why it should perhaps be rethought.
 	 *----------
 	 */
 	if (is_deduced)
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
@@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ extract_actual_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
  * extract_actual_join_clauses
  *
  * Extract bare clauses from 'restrictinfo_list', separating those that
- * syntactically match the join level from those that were pushed down.
+ * semantically match the join level from those that were pushed down.
  * Pseudoconstant clauses are excluded from the results.
  *
  * This is only used at outer joins, since for plain joins we don't care
@@ -433,15 +433,7 @@ extract_actual_join_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
 
 		Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
 
-		/*
-		 * We must check both is_pushed_down and required_relids, since an
-		 * outer-join clause that's been pushed down to some lower join level
-		 * via path parameterization will not be marked is_pushed_down;
-		 * nonetheless, it must be treated as a filter clause not a join
-		 * clause so far as the lower join level is concerned.
-		 */
-		if (rinfo->is_pushed_down ||
-			!bms_is_subset(rinfo->required_relids, joinrelids))
+		if (RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrelids))
 		{
 			if (!rinfo->pseudoconstant)
 				*otherquals = lappend(*otherquals, rinfo->clause);
diff --git a/src/include/nodes/relation.h b/src/include/nodes/relation.h
@@ -1537,7 +1537,8 @@ typedef struct LimitPath
  * if we decide that it can be pushed down into the nullable side of the join.
  * In that case it acts as a plain filter qual for wherever it gets evaluated.
  * (In short, is_pushed_down is only false for non-degenerate outer join
- * conditions.  Possibly we should rename it to reflect that meaning?)
+ * conditions.  Possibly we should rename it to reflect that meaning?  But
+ * see also the comments for RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN, below.)
  *
  * RestrictInfo nodes also contain an outerjoin_delayed flag, which is true
  * if the clause's applicability must be delayed due to any outer joins
@@ -1664,6 +1665,20 @@ typedef struct RestrictInfo
 	Selectivity right_bucketsize;		/* avg bucketsize of right side */
 } RestrictInfo;
 
+/*
+ * This macro embodies the correct way to test whether a RestrictInfo is
+ * "pushed down" to a given outer join, that is, should be treated as a filter
+ * clause rather than a join clause at that outer join.  This is certainly so
+ * if is_pushed_down is true; but examining that is not sufficient anymore,
+ * because outer-join clauses will get pushed down to lower outer joins when
+ * we generate a path for the lower outer join that is parameterized by the
+ * LHS of the upper one.  We can detect such a clause by noting that its
+ * required_relids exceed the scope of the join.
+ */
+#define RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrelids) \
+	((rinfo)->is_pushed_down || \
+	 !bms_is_subset((rinfo)->required_relids, joinrelids))
+
 /*
  * Since mergejoinscansel() is a relatively expensive function, and would
  * otherwise be invoked many times while planning a large join tree,
