Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quantum dynamic programming model #1302

Draft
wants to merge 46 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Quantum dynamic programming model #1302

wants to merge 46 commits into from

Conversation

marekgluza
Copy link
Contributor

@marekgluza marekgluza commented Apr 23, 2024

In https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09187 by Jeongrak Son, Marek Gluza, Ryuji Takagi, Nelly H. Y. Ng a framework for quantum recursion implementation using memory has been proposed.

This PR is adding a model into Qibo which parallels that paper and allows to explore backend-agnostic implementations of quantum dynamic programming (QDP).
More specifically, even though QDP is general this PR focuses on functioning on the level of established procedures, in particular density-matrix exponentiation using quantum instruction qubit recycling by means of (quantum) measurement emulation, see https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08838.
The generalization to hermitian-map exponentiation is anticipated and can easily follow by inheritance of the classess provided.

src/qibo/models/qdp/dynamic_programming.py is the key class file

  • the main base class is AbstractQuantumDynamicProgramming, which has predefines basic functions (such as measure a qubit for feedback reset) and 2 @abstractmethod which the user has to define: memory_usage_query_circuit and memory_call_circuit

A memory-usage query circuit is a qibo.Circuit whose unitary approximates $U =e^{i N}\in U(\mathcal H\otimes \mathcal H)$ implements the memory-usage query channel
$$\mathcal E_{s}^{\mathcal N,\rho}(\sigma) = Tr_{1}\left[e^{-iN s}\left(\rho\otimes\sigma\right)e^{iN s}\right]$$
instructed on $\rho$ and operating on $\sigma$.

A memory_call_circuit uses a Trotter-Suzuki decomposition of the desired dynamic unitary channel by means of memory usage queries
$$\mathcal E_{\text{QDP}}^{\mathcal N,\rho,M} := \left(\mathcal E_{1/M}^{\mathcal N,\rho}\right)^{M} = e^{i\mathcal N(\rho)} (\sigma) e^{-i\mathcal N(\rho)}+ O\left(1/{M}\right)$$
Here

  • the channel is dynamic because it is specified only during runtime when the quantum instruction becomes known
  • $\mathcal N(\rho) = \mathcal N(\rho)^\dagger$ is hermicity preserving and specifies how the quantum memory data is going to be used in the algorithm
  • $N$ is the partial transpose of the Choi matrix of $\mathcal N$

The approach take is to assume it is known how to compile unitaries generated by $N$ and then use this theory to implement the memory-call channel. We separate the nomenclature because tracing out generically will reduce purity of the working state $\sigma \mapsto \sigma'$. Instead we make only small rotations and repeat them many times - asymptotically implementing a memory call, i.e. calling quantum information from memory and then based on this input revealed on runtime modifying the state of the working registers.

The implementation intricacies begin when constructively answering how to implement multiple memory-usage queries.
The specific issue is how to in practice bring in multiple quantum instruction states into play. There are 3 main child classes of AbstractQuantumDynamicProgramming, which have the memory_call_circuit defined based on the abstract memory_usage_query_circuit. They apply different methods to create the required number of copies of instruction qubits:

  1. QDPSequentialInstruction: Instruction qubit is discarded after each use and we move to the next instruction qubit
  2. QDPMeasurementReset: Instruction qubit is reset after each use for reusing.
  3. QDPMeasurementEmulation: Using quantum measurement emulation as laid out by Kjaergaard (2020), where we apply either a rotation gate or identity gate with probability 0.5 to emulate a measurement.

Ultimately, any protocol withing the QDP framework that is to be executed on a Qibo backend is specified by memory_usage_query_circuit after inheriting from one of these 3 'transpiling' classes (transpiling in the abstract sense the logistics of providing quantum instructions; transpiling into a fixed architecture layout will be treated elsewhere).

To evaluate the function, in this PR, we demonstrate DME (density matrix exponentiation), which appies $N$ in steps small angle given by the $SWAP$ gate which for 2 qubits is just the 2 qubit Heisenberg Hamiltonian after appropriate rescaling.
We use QDPSequentialInstruction protocol for generating copies of instruction state $\rho$.

Checklist:

  • Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
  • Tests are passing.
  • Coverage does not decrease.
  • Documentation is updated.

@marekgluza marekgluza added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 23, 2024
@scarrazza scarrazza added this to the Qibo 0.2.11 milestone Jul 24, 2024
@scarrazza scarrazza removed this from the Qibo 0.2.12 milestone Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants