Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to content

Change AtomicReference API: try_update and try_update! #330

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
pitr-ch opened this issue Jun 6, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Change AtomicReference API: try_update and try_update! #330

pitr-ch opened this issue Jun 6, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement Adding features, adding tests, improving documentation.
Milestone
0.9.0

Comments

@pitr-ch
Copy link
Member

pitr-ch commented Jun 6, 2015

see #281 (comment)
@pitr-ch pitr-ch added the enhancement Adding features, adding tests, improving documentation. label Jun 6, 2015
@pitr-ch pitr-ch added this to the 0.9.0 Release milestone Jun 6, 2015
ianks added a commit to ianks/concurrent-ruby that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2015
@ianks
AtomicReference: update try_update API (resolves ruby-concurrency#330)
49e7403
ianks added a commit to ianks/concurrent-ruby that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2015
@ianks
AtomicReference: update try_update API (resolves ruby-concurrency#330)
7217b6e
jdantonio added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 19, 2015
@jdantonio
Merge pull request #336 from ianks/atomic-ref-try
d5b2635 
AtomicReference: update try_update API (resolves #330)
@jdantonio
Copy link
Member

Fixed in #336

ianks added a commit to ianks/concurrent-ruby that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2015
@ianks
AtomicReference: update try_update API (resolves ruby-concurrency#330)
38f4ab5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement Adding features, adding tests, improving documentation.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.9.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jdantonio @pitr-ch