Articles by Sam S . B . Shonkoff
Leo Baeck Institute Year Book, 2023
Awarded the 2023 Leo Baeck Institute Year Book Essay Prize
Martin Buber's anthologies of Hasidic... more Awarded the 2023 Leo Baeck Institute Year Book Essay Prize
Martin Buber's anthologies of Hasidic tales remain some of his most widely read writings, but few have studied them intertextually vis-à-vis the original Hasidic sources. This article does so, focusing specifically on Buber's representations of gender in Hasidism. Reading Buber's tales hermeneutically for gender sheds light on Buber, Hasidism, and the dynamic confluence between them. Firstly, it helps us to identify key aspects of Buber's representation of Hasidic theology. Regardless of his intentions, when Buber remolded Hasidic sources to prioritize bodily concreteness over spiritual abstraction, meetings over meditations, and tales over treatises, he subverted theological-metaphysical constructions of gender in Hasidism. Secondly, reading the tales for gender illuminates key aspects of Buber's representation of Hasidic communities. Buber often softened and omitted sexist elements in the original sources. While this may reveal his egalitarian impulses at times, the article demonstrates that Buber's efforts to hide misogyny actually rendered women even less visible than they were in the original sources, as images of women dissolved into a sort of gender-blind, neutral (i.e. masculine) humanism. As a whole, Buber's textual alterations raise thorny questions regarding the ethics of neo-Hasidism or any other movements that gloss over the shadows of historical phenomena.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 2022
It has become commonplace among scholars to map Martin Buber's concepts of "I-It" and "I-Thou" on... more It has become commonplace among scholars to map Martin Buber's concepts of "I-It" and "I-Thou" onto Kant's phenomenon and noumenon, respectively. However, this has resulted in significant misconceptions about Buber's phenomenology of dialogue. In fact, his philosophy was decidedly post-Kantian in the dual sense of being both under the influence of Kant and in opposition to him, and attention to themes of embodiment (Leiblichkeit) in Buber's writings helps to disentangle these aspects. Through close philological readings, this paper demonstrates how Buber sought to circumvent the transcendental boundary between appearance and being, appropriated Kant's language of "intuition" to describe a sensory encounter with the presence of a thing in itself, and affirmed that while being is not apprehended in terms of space and time, it is nonetheless spatial and temporal. Ultimately, these investigations elucidate what I term Buber's dialogical monism, which in some ways anticipated insights of new materialism.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Oxford Bibliographies, 2022
A bibliographic resource to support scholars, students, and seekers in their studies of neo-Hasid... more A bibliographic resource to support scholars, students, and seekers in their studies of neo-Hasidism.
From the introduction:
“Neo-Hasidim” (sing. Neo-Hasid) are non-Hasidic Jews who draw upon Hasidism for purposes of spiritual or cultural renewal. Neo-Hasidism is thus rooted in a belief that the core of Hasidism—often identified with the movement’s earliest generations—is transferrable to other sociological contexts. Neo-Hasidim tend to be more secular and liberal-minded than Hasidim, but this is not necessarily the case. Note that even the most radical innovators within Hasidism itself, such as Nahman of Bratslav, Kalonymus Kalman Shapira of Piaseczno, or Menaḥem Mendel Schneerson, are not “neo-Hasidic” per se, since they operated within Hasidic communities. A border case, however, is women from Hasidic families who have been excluded from the central sites of Hasidic identity performance due to their gender and yet drawn deeply upon Hasidism in their own lives. When neo-Hasidism emerged in Central Europe at the dawn of the 20th century, it represented a striking cultural shift. From the Enlightenment through the 19th century, liberal Jews had generally cast Hasidism as backward, superstitious, and irrational. This was largely a strategic position: by differentiating themselves from “uncivilized,” “oriental” Ostjuden (Eastern European Jews), especially those ecstatic Hasidim, liberal Jews could demonstrate their own worthiness of citizenship and civil rights in modern nation-states. Around the turn of the century, though, a new generation of Jews rejected these bourgeois, assimilationist aspirations. On one hand, unmitigated discrimination against Jews and a rise of racial anti-Semitism seemed to suggest that liberal Jewish denigration of Ostjuden was unproductive, if not immoral. On the other hand, at the same time, a wave of neo-Romanticism swelled in the region, as more and more Europeans asserted that modernist rationalism, promises of progress, and industrialization and urbanization had only bred disenchantment and alienation. Many turned to folk cultures, mythologies, and mysticisms as keys to a renewed vitality. From this perspective, Hasidism took on a new aura. The first wave of what came to be called neo-Hasidism began as a literary phenomenon. Modern Hebrew and Yiddish writers such as Y. L. Peretz (b. 1852–d. 1915), Mikhah Yosef Berdichevsky (b. 1865– d. 1921), and Samuel Abba Horodezky (b. 1871– d. 1957) wrote glowingly about Hasidism from decidedly non-Hasidic—or, in some cases, ex-Hasidic—vantage points. Around the same time, Hillel Zeitlin (b. 1871– d. 1942) and Martin Buber (b. 1878– d. 1965) celebrated Hasidism as a resource for Jewish religious renewal. Decades later, a second wave of neo-Hasidism took shape among spiritual seekers in the North American Jewish counterculture of the 1960s. Sparked initially by immigrants who had fled the Shoah (Holocaust)—most notably Abraham Joshua Heschel (b. 1907– d. 1972), Zalman Schachter-Shalomi (b. 1924– d. 2014), and Shlomo Carlebach (b. 1925– d. 1994)—the neo-Hasidic ethos gained steam through activities of US-born seekers and scholars, especially through the Jewish Renewal movement. Additional, and sometimes surprising, offshoots of neo-Hasidism continue to spread through today.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Religions, 2022
From the special issue of _Religions_ in honor of Paul Mendes-Flohr's 80th birthday, edited by Cl... more From the special issue of _Religions_ in honor of Paul Mendes-Flohr's 80th birthday, edited by Claudia Welz, Christian Wiese, and Bjarke Mørkøre Stigel Hansen.
“Post-traditional” Jewishness—a distinctively modern condition wherein past sources of theological authority and religious normativity are no longer self-evident—has been one of the most abiding interests in Paul Mendes-Flohr’s writings for more than four decades. The present article traces the contours of this concern over time. In a number of publications between 1978 and 1987, Mendes-Flohr highlights “secular religiosity” as a manifestation of post-traditional Jewishness, exemplified by figures such as Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig. These early writings intimate the possibility of a critical and yet nonetheless integrated Jewish religious subject, grounded hermeneutically in Jewish sources and sociologically in the Jewish community of destiny (Schicksalsgemeinschaft). Starting in the late 1980s, however, Mendes-Flohr’s representations of post-traditional Jewishness begin to emphasize greater degrees of complexity and, indeed, fragmentation. These later writings gesture less to visions of secular religiosity than toward postures of “undogmatic, pluralistic, and open” self-reflectivity before the ever-changing faces of reality. Throughout this rich trajectory in Mendes-Flohr’s thought, though, we see that he returns continually—and ever more trenchantly—to dialogical life as a grounding principle.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Religion, 2021
The annual Eranos conference in Ascona, Switzerland, contributed immensely to discourse about rel... more The annual Eranos conference in Ascona, Switzerland, contributed immensely to discourse about religion and spirituality from its inception in 1933. These gatherings, which revolved largely around the psychologist Carl Jung, investigated religious consciousness by way of spiritual “symbols” or “archetypes.” Such images were generally treated as timeless, autonomous phenomena that penetrate beyond historical particularities and social forms into the transcendent depths of the mystical Self. Discourse at Eranos thus portrayed the essence of religion as decontextualized and deethicized. The present article demonstrates that the German-Jewish philosopher Martin Buber was already sensitive to the sociopolitical dangers of this approach when he lectured at Eranos in 1934. The essay that emerged out of those lectures, “Sinnbildliche und sakramentale Existenz im Judentum (Symbolic and Sacramental Existence in Judaism),” is widely read as a classic of Buber’s writings on Hasidism. And yet, the historical details surrounding Buber’s Eranos lectures, especially as evidenced in the unpublished letters between him and the conference organizer, Olga Fröbe-Kapteyn, as well as the stenographer’s typescript of Buber’s live orations, shed remarkable new light on the well-known essay. “Sinnbildliche und sakramentale Existenz” was, in fact, composed largely as a polemic against Jung and his followers at Eranos, a number of whom were aligned with National Socialism and other fascist movements. In an act of scholarly resistance, Buber challenged widespread perspectives at Eranos regarding symbolism, Gnosticism, and the nature of religion. In so doing, he anticipated later critiques of Eranos that took shape in the 1990s.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bill of Health, 2020
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Religions (special issue edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr), 2018
It is well known that Martin Buber abandoned Jewish law as a binding code. Scholars have identifi... more It is well known that Martin Buber abandoned Jewish law as a binding code. Scholars have identified him accurately as a religious anarchist, and his perspective is best characterized as metanomian—that is, one that locates the essence of religiosity outside of any fixed system, without necessarily opposing that system as a matter of principle. And yet, such general characterizations offer only a vague picture of Buber's stance. This paper demonstrates that it is especially illustrative for us to turn to Buber's Hasidic tales. First of all, precisely because Buber's concept of practice was irreducible to any static system or code, the genre of narrative conveys far more than any abstract formulation can. Moreover, inasmuch as Buber's Hasidic tales were his own hermeneutical refractions of earlier sources, which were in themselves teeming with images of practice, our intertextual investigations reveal at once narrative representations of religious life and Buber's personal interpretations of those narratives. What emerges from this study, then, is a textured and vivid vision of religious practice, which was not merely a peripheral concern but a life-encompassing core of Buber's thought.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
In geveb, 2019
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Journal of Kyoto Association of Jewish Thought 7.2 (2019): 365-381, 2019
Translated into Japanese by Rui Matsuba.
For a related article in English, see my “Metanomianis... more Translated into Japanese by Rui Matsuba.
For a related article in English, see my “Metanomianism and Religious Praxis in Martin Buber’s Hasidic Tales,” _Religions_ 9.12 (2018).
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception article on the modern Jewish reception of Jeremiah (p... more Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception article on the modern Jewish reception of Jeremiah (prophet and book). I show how themes of exile/homeland, lamentation, and social justice are especially salient in the modern Jewish historical contexts of emancipation, Zionism, and the Shoah.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The Journal of Religion (Vol. 93, No. 4), Oct 2013
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Books by Sam S . B . Shonkoff
Brandeis University Press, 2020
Hasidism has attracted, repelled, and bewildered philosophers, historians, and theologians since ... more Hasidism has attracted, repelled, and bewildered philosophers, historians, and theologians since its inception in the eighteenth century. In Hasidism: Writings on Devotion, Community, and Life in the Modern World, Ariel Evan Mayse and Sam Berrin Shonkoff present students and scholars with a vibrant and polyphonic set of Hasidic confrontations with the modern world. In this collection, they show that the modern Hasid marks not only another example of a Jewish pietist, but someone who is committed to an ethos of seeking wisdom, joy, and intimacy with the divine.
While this volume focuses on Hasidism, it wrestles with a core set of questions that permeate modern Jewish thought and religious thought more generally: What is the relationship between God and the world? What is the relationship between God and the human being? But Hasidic thought is cast with mystical, psychological, and even magical accents, and offers radically different answers to core issues of modern concern. The editors draw selections from an array of genres including women’s supplications; sermons and homilies; personal diaries and memoirs; correspondence; stories; polemics; legal codes; and rabbinic responsa. These selections consciously move between everyday lived experience and the most ineffable mystical secrets, reflecting the multidimensional nature of this unusual religious and social movement. The editors include canonical texts from the first generation of Hasidic leaders up through present-day ultra-orthodox, as well as neo-Hasidic voices and, in so doing, demonstrate the unfolding of a rich and complex phenomenon that continues to evolve today.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Brill, 2018
Here is the preface with notes about the various essays.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Book Chapters by Sam S . B . Shonkoff
Jewish Culture and Creativity: Essays in Honor of Professor Michael Fishbane on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday, 2023
The normative texts of Jewish tradition tend to portray young children as not-yet-adults. There a... more The normative texts of Jewish tradition tend to portray young children as not-yet-adults. There are expressions of excitement for them to grow up and perform actions of Torah study, marriage, and righteous deeds, but one is hard-pressed to find classical sources that draw inspiration from young children themselves as they are. Early Hasidism broke from this trend in significant ways. In contrast to the scholarly ideals of eighteenth-century Ashkenazi Jewish culture, some early Hasidic sages went so far as to suggest that one who is ignorant of the tradition and even illiterate may have an easier time accessing the joy and trembling of spiritual connection. Hasidic celebrations of the “simple person” (tamim) is a much discussed expression of this perspective. A rather overlooked image, though, is that of the child. This article explores expressions of “child mind” in early Hasidic spirituality. In truth, much like the contemporaneous romanticization of children in Romantic literature, the theological sources we will examine say more about adults than they do about actual children. “Child mind” proves to be a decidedly grownup affair. Thus, in this essay, child mind refers precisely to the textures of children’s (including babies’) inner experiences, as imagined by adults in their own personal quests for meaning. A common ideal in this vein is a sort of beginner’s mind, where everything is new. However, Hasidic ruminations expand far beyond this frame, opening up perspectives that both reflect and defy insights from the field of developmental psychology.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Routledge Handbook of Religion and the Body, 2023
A remarkable number of Jewish commentators today highlight the biblical phrase na'aseh ve-nishma,... more A remarkable number of Jewish commentators today highlight the biblical phrase na'aseh ve-nishma, literally "we shall do and we shall hear" (Exod. 24:7), to affirm that theological truth is only intelligible through the prism of bodily events: in "doing," we "hear" or understand divinity. These often cite the Babylonian Talmud (Shabbat 88a) as a prooftext. However, my paper demonstrates that this interpretation is in fact distinctively modern, reflecting intellectual and political shifts in Europe, especially "enlightened" critiques of metaphysics and heteronomy. This modernness does not imply that the interpretation is therefore some invasive species, corrupting a pristine landscape of indigenous Judaism. On the contrary, Jewish theology unfolds diasporically and hermeneutically—and here is the very heartbeat of a living tradition. The new gloss emerges in late-eighteenth-century Hasidic mysticism and flows thereafter into other tributaries of Jewish thought, from Buber, Heschel, and Levinas through Avivah Gottlieb Zornberg, Jay Michaelson, and Mara Benjamin. In tracing the hermeneutical afterlives of Exod 24:7, we unveil not only a striking mutation in modern Jewish exegesis but also a broader "embodied theological" turn in modern religiosity. This paper illuminates the intertextual and phenomenological textures of this transformation.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Michael Fishbane: Jewish Hermeneutical Theology, 2015
This essay is the introduction to the book _Michael Fishbane: Jewish Hermeneutical Theology_ (201... more This essay is the introduction to the book _Michael Fishbane: Jewish Hermeneutical Theology_ (2015), a volume in Brill's Library of Contemporary Jewish Philosophers series, edited by Hava Tirosh-Samuelson and Aaron Hughes. The "intellectual portrait" is a first attempt to integrate the many facets and phases of Fishbane's life and work.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
_Martin Buber: His Intellectual and Scholarly Legacy_ (Brill, 2018)
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
A New Hasidism: Roots, 2019
This essay introduces readers to Martin Buber as a foundational figure for Neo-Hasidism. In addit... more This essay introduces readers to Martin Buber as a foundational figure for Neo-Hasidism. In addition to documenting his changing perspectives on Hasidism over time, the essay also examines Buber's personal shift toward more relational modes of thought, emphasizing especially the intellectual influences of his grandmother Adele Buber (née Weiser) and his wife, Paula Buber (née Winkler). This piece is designed to be stimulating for both specialists and non-specialists alike.
Readers are also encouraged to turn to Buber's essays featured in this chapter, which I have annotated with references to the original Hasidic sources.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Playa Dust: Collected Stories from Burning Man , 2014
Meditations on the Burning Man festival through the prisms of desert, dust, and destruction in Je... more Meditations on the Burning Man festival through the prisms of desert, dust, and destruction in Jewish sources.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Articles by Sam S . B . Shonkoff
Martin Buber's anthologies of Hasidic tales remain some of his most widely read writings, but few have studied them intertextually vis-à-vis the original Hasidic sources. This article does so, focusing specifically on Buber's representations of gender in Hasidism. Reading Buber's tales hermeneutically for gender sheds light on Buber, Hasidism, and the dynamic confluence between them. Firstly, it helps us to identify key aspects of Buber's representation of Hasidic theology. Regardless of his intentions, when Buber remolded Hasidic sources to prioritize bodily concreteness over spiritual abstraction, meetings over meditations, and tales over treatises, he subverted theological-metaphysical constructions of gender in Hasidism. Secondly, reading the tales for gender illuminates key aspects of Buber's representation of Hasidic communities. Buber often softened and omitted sexist elements in the original sources. While this may reveal his egalitarian impulses at times, the article demonstrates that Buber's efforts to hide misogyny actually rendered women even less visible than they were in the original sources, as images of women dissolved into a sort of gender-blind, neutral (i.e. masculine) humanism. As a whole, Buber's textual alterations raise thorny questions regarding the ethics of neo-Hasidism or any other movements that gloss over the shadows of historical phenomena.
From the introduction:
“Neo-Hasidim” (sing. Neo-Hasid) are non-Hasidic Jews who draw upon Hasidism for purposes of spiritual or cultural renewal. Neo-Hasidism is thus rooted in a belief that the core of Hasidism—often identified with the movement’s earliest generations—is transferrable to other sociological contexts. Neo-Hasidim tend to be more secular and liberal-minded than Hasidim, but this is not necessarily the case. Note that even the most radical innovators within Hasidism itself, such as Nahman of Bratslav, Kalonymus Kalman Shapira of Piaseczno, or Menaḥem Mendel Schneerson, are not “neo-Hasidic” per se, since they operated within Hasidic communities. A border case, however, is women from Hasidic families who have been excluded from the central sites of Hasidic identity performance due to their gender and yet drawn deeply upon Hasidism in their own lives. When neo-Hasidism emerged in Central Europe at the dawn of the 20th century, it represented a striking cultural shift. From the Enlightenment through the 19th century, liberal Jews had generally cast Hasidism as backward, superstitious, and irrational. This was largely a strategic position: by differentiating themselves from “uncivilized,” “oriental” Ostjuden (Eastern European Jews), especially those ecstatic Hasidim, liberal Jews could demonstrate their own worthiness of citizenship and civil rights in modern nation-states. Around the turn of the century, though, a new generation of Jews rejected these bourgeois, assimilationist aspirations. On one hand, unmitigated discrimination against Jews and a rise of racial anti-Semitism seemed to suggest that liberal Jewish denigration of Ostjuden was unproductive, if not immoral. On the other hand, at the same time, a wave of neo-Romanticism swelled in the region, as more and more Europeans asserted that modernist rationalism, promises of progress, and industrialization and urbanization had only bred disenchantment and alienation. Many turned to folk cultures, mythologies, and mysticisms as keys to a renewed vitality. From this perspective, Hasidism took on a new aura. The first wave of what came to be called neo-Hasidism began as a literary phenomenon. Modern Hebrew and Yiddish writers such as Y. L. Peretz (b. 1852–d. 1915), Mikhah Yosef Berdichevsky (b. 1865– d. 1921), and Samuel Abba Horodezky (b. 1871– d. 1957) wrote glowingly about Hasidism from decidedly non-Hasidic—or, in some cases, ex-Hasidic—vantage points. Around the same time, Hillel Zeitlin (b. 1871– d. 1942) and Martin Buber (b. 1878– d. 1965) celebrated Hasidism as a resource for Jewish religious renewal. Decades later, a second wave of neo-Hasidism took shape among spiritual seekers in the North American Jewish counterculture of the 1960s. Sparked initially by immigrants who had fled the Shoah (Holocaust)—most notably Abraham Joshua Heschel (b. 1907– d. 1972), Zalman Schachter-Shalomi (b. 1924– d. 2014), and Shlomo Carlebach (b. 1925– d. 1994)—the neo-Hasidic ethos gained steam through activities of US-born seekers and scholars, especially through the Jewish Renewal movement. Additional, and sometimes surprising, offshoots of neo-Hasidism continue to spread through today.
“Post-traditional” Jewishness—a distinctively modern condition wherein past sources of theological authority and religious normativity are no longer self-evident—has been one of the most abiding interests in Paul Mendes-Flohr’s writings for more than four decades. The present article traces the contours of this concern over time. In a number of publications between 1978 and 1987, Mendes-Flohr highlights “secular religiosity” as a manifestation of post-traditional Jewishness, exemplified by figures such as Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig. These early writings intimate the possibility of a critical and yet nonetheless integrated Jewish religious subject, grounded hermeneutically in Jewish sources and sociologically in the Jewish community of destiny (Schicksalsgemeinschaft). Starting in the late 1980s, however, Mendes-Flohr’s representations of post-traditional Jewishness begin to emphasize greater degrees of complexity and, indeed, fragmentation. These later writings gesture less to visions of secular religiosity than toward postures of “undogmatic, pluralistic, and open” self-reflectivity before the ever-changing faces of reality. Throughout this rich trajectory in Mendes-Flohr’s thought, though, we see that he returns continually—and ever more trenchantly—to dialogical life as a grounding principle.
https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2020/11/04/what-the-study-of-religion-can-teach-us-about-psychedelics/
This piece is part of a digital symposium on "Psychedelics and America" through Harvard Law School's Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics.
For a related article in English, see my “Metanomianism and Religious Praxis in Martin Buber’s Hasidic Tales,” _Religions_ 9.12 (2018).
Books by Sam S . B . Shonkoff
While this volume focuses on Hasidism, it wrestles with a core set of questions that permeate modern Jewish thought and religious thought more generally: What is the relationship between God and the world? What is the relationship between God and the human being? But Hasidic thought is cast with mystical, psychological, and even magical accents, and offers radically different answers to core issues of modern concern. The editors draw selections from an array of genres including women’s supplications; sermons and homilies; personal diaries and memoirs; correspondence; stories; polemics; legal codes; and rabbinic responsa. These selections consciously move between everyday lived experience and the most ineffable mystical secrets, reflecting the multidimensional nature of this unusual religious and social movement. The editors include canonical texts from the first generation of Hasidic leaders up through present-day ultra-orthodox, as well as neo-Hasidic voices and, in so doing, demonstrate the unfolding of a rich and complex phenomenon that continues to evolve today.
Book Chapters by Sam S . B . Shonkoff
Readers are also encouraged to turn to Buber's essays featured in this chapter, which I have annotated with references to the original Hasidic sources.
Martin Buber's anthologies of Hasidic tales remain some of his most widely read writings, but few have studied them intertextually vis-à-vis the original Hasidic sources. This article does so, focusing specifically on Buber's representations of gender in Hasidism. Reading Buber's tales hermeneutically for gender sheds light on Buber, Hasidism, and the dynamic confluence between them. Firstly, it helps us to identify key aspects of Buber's representation of Hasidic theology. Regardless of his intentions, when Buber remolded Hasidic sources to prioritize bodily concreteness over spiritual abstraction, meetings over meditations, and tales over treatises, he subverted theological-metaphysical constructions of gender in Hasidism. Secondly, reading the tales for gender illuminates key aspects of Buber's representation of Hasidic communities. Buber often softened and omitted sexist elements in the original sources. While this may reveal his egalitarian impulses at times, the article demonstrates that Buber's efforts to hide misogyny actually rendered women even less visible than they were in the original sources, as images of women dissolved into a sort of gender-blind, neutral (i.e. masculine) humanism. As a whole, Buber's textual alterations raise thorny questions regarding the ethics of neo-Hasidism or any other movements that gloss over the shadows of historical phenomena.
From the introduction:
“Neo-Hasidim” (sing. Neo-Hasid) are non-Hasidic Jews who draw upon Hasidism for purposes of spiritual or cultural renewal. Neo-Hasidism is thus rooted in a belief that the core of Hasidism—often identified with the movement’s earliest generations—is transferrable to other sociological contexts. Neo-Hasidim tend to be more secular and liberal-minded than Hasidim, but this is not necessarily the case. Note that even the most radical innovators within Hasidism itself, such as Nahman of Bratslav, Kalonymus Kalman Shapira of Piaseczno, or Menaḥem Mendel Schneerson, are not “neo-Hasidic” per se, since they operated within Hasidic communities. A border case, however, is women from Hasidic families who have been excluded from the central sites of Hasidic identity performance due to their gender and yet drawn deeply upon Hasidism in their own lives. When neo-Hasidism emerged in Central Europe at the dawn of the 20th century, it represented a striking cultural shift. From the Enlightenment through the 19th century, liberal Jews had generally cast Hasidism as backward, superstitious, and irrational. This was largely a strategic position: by differentiating themselves from “uncivilized,” “oriental” Ostjuden (Eastern European Jews), especially those ecstatic Hasidim, liberal Jews could demonstrate their own worthiness of citizenship and civil rights in modern nation-states. Around the turn of the century, though, a new generation of Jews rejected these bourgeois, assimilationist aspirations. On one hand, unmitigated discrimination against Jews and a rise of racial anti-Semitism seemed to suggest that liberal Jewish denigration of Ostjuden was unproductive, if not immoral. On the other hand, at the same time, a wave of neo-Romanticism swelled in the region, as more and more Europeans asserted that modernist rationalism, promises of progress, and industrialization and urbanization had only bred disenchantment and alienation. Many turned to folk cultures, mythologies, and mysticisms as keys to a renewed vitality. From this perspective, Hasidism took on a new aura. The first wave of what came to be called neo-Hasidism began as a literary phenomenon. Modern Hebrew and Yiddish writers such as Y. L. Peretz (b. 1852–d. 1915), Mikhah Yosef Berdichevsky (b. 1865– d. 1921), and Samuel Abba Horodezky (b. 1871– d. 1957) wrote glowingly about Hasidism from decidedly non-Hasidic—or, in some cases, ex-Hasidic—vantage points. Around the same time, Hillel Zeitlin (b. 1871– d. 1942) and Martin Buber (b. 1878– d. 1965) celebrated Hasidism as a resource for Jewish religious renewal. Decades later, a second wave of neo-Hasidism took shape among spiritual seekers in the North American Jewish counterculture of the 1960s. Sparked initially by immigrants who had fled the Shoah (Holocaust)—most notably Abraham Joshua Heschel (b. 1907– d. 1972), Zalman Schachter-Shalomi (b. 1924– d. 2014), and Shlomo Carlebach (b. 1925– d. 1994)—the neo-Hasidic ethos gained steam through activities of US-born seekers and scholars, especially through the Jewish Renewal movement. Additional, and sometimes surprising, offshoots of neo-Hasidism continue to spread through today.
“Post-traditional” Jewishness—a distinctively modern condition wherein past sources of theological authority and religious normativity are no longer self-evident—has been one of the most abiding interests in Paul Mendes-Flohr’s writings for more than four decades. The present article traces the contours of this concern over time. In a number of publications between 1978 and 1987, Mendes-Flohr highlights “secular religiosity” as a manifestation of post-traditional Jewishness, exemplified by figures such as Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig. These early writings intimate the possibility of a critical and yet nonetheless integrated Jewish religious subject, grounded hermeneutically in Jewish sources and sociologically in the Jewish community of destiny (Schicksalsgemeinschaft). Starting in the late 1980s, however, Mendes-Flohr’s representations of post-traditional Jewishness begin to emphasize greater degrees of complexity and, indeed, fragmentation. These later writings gesture less to visions of secular religiosity than toward postures of “undogmatic, pluralistic, and open” self-reflectivity before the ever-changing faces of reality. Throughout this rich trajectory in Mendes-Flohr’s thought, though, we see that he returns continually—and ever more trenchantly—to dialogical life as a grounding principle.
https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2020/11/04/what-the-study-of-religion-can-teach-us-about-psychedelics/
This piece is part of a digital symposium on "Psychedelics and America" through Harvard Law School's Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics.
For a related article in English, see my “Metanomianism and Religious Praxis in Martin Buber’s Hasidic Tales,” _Religions_ 9.12 (2018).
While this volume focuses on Hasidism, it wrestles with a core set of questions that permeate modern Jewish thought and religious thought more generally: What is the relationship between God and the world? What is the relationship between God and the human being? But Hasidic thought is cast with mystical, psychological, and even magical accents, and offers radically different answers to core issues of modern concern. The editors draw selections from an array of genres including women’s supplications; sermons and homilies; personal diaries and memoirs; correspondence; stories; polemics; legal codes; and rabbinic responsa. These selections consciously move between everyday lived experience and the most ineffable mystical secrets, reflecting the multidimensional nature of this unusual religious and social movement. The editors include canonical texts from the first generation of Hasidic leaders up through present-day ultra-orthodox, as well as neo-Hasidic voices and, in so doing, demonstrate the unfolding of a rich and complex phenomenon that continues to evolve today.
Readers are also encouraged to turn to Buber's essays featured in this chapter, which I have annotated with references to the original Hasidic sources.
https://www.gashmiusmagazine.com/eyheh-havayah-ehyeh
[An expanded, academic version of this piece will appear as "Child Mind in Hasidic Spirituality" in 2023—stay tuned!]
Hasidism was a countercultural Jewish mystical movement that emerged in a remote corner of southeast Poland in the 18th century and spread like wildfire throughout Eastern Europe. A foundational principle in Hasidic mysticism was that joy should be at the very core of one's practice. This was a subversive approach in those 18th-century Christian lands, where, on one hand, pietists often embraced ascetic and austere ideals, and, on the other hand, Jews faced poverty, pogroms, and persecution. For the early Hasidic mystics, though, what did “joy” (simḥah) truly mean, and how did people seek it? In this session, we will explore how various Hasidic sources portray joy not as a particular emotion, per se, but rather as that which arises when we decenter the self, dissolve the ego, and thereby create space for divinity. Sometimes this manifests as ecstatic pleasure, sometimes as deep crying, and sometimes as somersaulting around looking like an ass.
In recent decades, Leigh Eric Schmidt and others have demonstrated the extent to which modern mystical discourse has reflected not only Protestant sensibilities but also the modern project of liberalism. In this paper, I examine the politics of mysticism—and notions of "mystical death," in particular—through a lens of Jewish cultural history in order to shed new light on both the category of mysticism and modern liberal politics, including different formations of modern Jewish politics. While scholars such as Leora Batnitzky, Aamir Mufti, and Sarah Hammerschlag have shown how attention to the “Jewish question” illuminates foundational blind spots, complexities, and dangers of liberalism, this paper builds upon that scholarship through demonstrating how representations of Judaism among the architects of modern mysticism reveals a great deal about that very category and its entanglements with liberalism. My talk refracts these materials through the prism of three different pathways in modern Jewish politics: assimilation, nationalism, and diaspora.
https://discovergtux.gtu.edu/library/assimilation-sovereignty-diaspora-the-politics-of-mystical-death-from-a-jewish-perspective-224051/611438/about/
My lecture, “‘Not propositional but concrete through and through’: Michael Fishbane’s Conception of God," seeks to understand Fishbane's theology largely through putting him in dialogue with Gershom Scholem. This conference took place only two weeks after October 7th, during the early phase of the violent aftermath. Since Fishbane's conception of God is inseparable from ethical reflection, I therefore concluded my talk with efforts to apply my teacher's fourfold hermeneutic to how we might navigate the situation in Israel-Palestine with utmost attunement.
To what extent have altered states of consciousness been theologically significant for Jewish theology and practice? Does this depend on what types of practices or settings triggered those states? If so, what about new spiritual techniques adopted by Jewish communities, perhaps even drawn from other religious cultures? In what ways, if at all, have ingestions of psychoactive substances transformed Jewish theology? And how might this all relate to contemporary Jewish experiments with psychedelics?
In this panel, such questions animated discussion among scholars of Jewish mysticism. Through considerations of historical, phenomenological, and hermeneutical dimensions of Jewish theology, these critics reflected together on the cultural significance of Jewish psychedelia today.
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQPTb5u9F-U
Podcast:
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/harvard-divinity-school/id1042749225?i=1000616187450
https://open.spotify.com/episode/2eVwtqa0GrlS7BeqRMMOcx?si=19e7cc8bc18e4287
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfJ65u_wKB8
A video of our conversation can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I4_1Kbc-ys.
Or the audio podcast can be found on Spotify (https://open.spotify.com/episode/72xObOGGc5CCv6tZk84W3K?si=750ccc2ee31c4937) or on Apple (https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=1612279474&i=1000663704523) or wherever else you stream your podcasts.
https://discovergtux.gtu.edu/library/psychedelics-and-religion-part-i-177415/394795/path/
https://discovergtux.gtu.edu/library/psychedelics-and-religion-part-2-189643/451347/path/