For socialist China, regulating the distribution of sounds and sound infrastructures was part of the nation-building project. During this era, building nationwide broadcasting networks was an important agenda for the Chinese Communist...
moreFor socialist China, regulating the distribution of sounds and sound infrastructures was part of the nation-building project. During this era, building nationwide broadcasting networks was an important agenda for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to mobilize the labor force for agricultural and industrial modernization and to connect the individual with the collective and the national. To achieve an ideal distribution of national radio broadcasts, the Chinese socialist state not only controlled the content production and broadcasting infrastructures but also banned listening to so-called enemy radio (ditai)-Mandarin-based foreign radio stations that often targeted Chinese audiences with anti-Communist propaganda. Most enemy radio stations were those managed and controlled by Taiwan, the United States, the UK, and Australia, such as Voice of Free China (Taiwan), Voice of America (VOA), the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), and ABC Radio (Australia), among others. This chapter will hence focus on the state's attempts to control illicit listening in the historical context of Chinese socialism and its nation-building project in the 1960s and 1970s. In the international context, the 1960s and 1970s were also a time period when the politics of the Cold War generated the "airy curtains" of broadcasting warfare (Badenoch, Fickers, and Henrich-Franke 2013). The curtains of electromagnetic waves functioned as an airy break between the Eastern and Western Blocs, but it also paradoxically put them in communication through a process of mutual contamination. One of the most important defining features of high-quality broadcasting signals was that it enabled radio broadcasting to go across national borders. These borders are often demarcated by boundary lines, mountains and rivers, military units, immigration offices, and other institutional and material regimes-anything imagined to be "solid. " This ethereal quality of signals led to a celebration of radio broadcasting's deterritorializing capacity that problematizes the totalized imagination of nation, nationhood, and other kinds of supranational formations. However, recent studies on the materiality of media remind us that sounds and electromagnetic signals also have their infrastructural bases-radio stations, state institutions, antennas, wires, transmitters, receivers-that are no less solid or less material. Media scholars and