Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04498357.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UNCTAD experts as an intellectual basis for developing countries' involvement in the reform of the international monetary system. Paper presented at the Summer Institute of the Center for the History of Political Economy, Duke University, June 19-22, 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Raphaël Orange-Leroy

    (AGORA - EA 7392 - Laboratoire AGORA - CY - CY Cergy Paris Université, IDHES - Institutions et Dynamiques Historiques de l'Économie et de la Société - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - ENS Paris Saclay - Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, CRHIA - Centre de recherches en histoire internationale et Atlantique - UR 1163 - ULR - La Rochelle Université - Nantes Univ - UFR HHAA - Nantes Université - UFR Histoire, Histoire de l'Art et Archéologie - Nantes Université - pôle Humanités - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)

Abstract

This paper shows that the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and the group of 77 developing countries (G77) participated in the 1960s international monetary negotiations. This involvement was based on the agenda built by a group of experts gathered by UNCTAD in 1965. The group was composed of academic and practitioner economists from all over the world, including some famous names, such as Richard Kahn, Tibor Scitovsky, and Trevor Swan, as well as less-known though influential figures, including I. G. Patel, Gamani Corea, and Jorge Gonzalez del Valle. UNCTAD served as an "institutional infrastructure" (Gasper 2011) that allowed for the emergence of new analyses and narratives on the interests of developing countries in the international monetary reform that was being discussed among the wealthy countries of the Group of Ten (G10). The report of the experts proved influential. At the intellectual level, it convinced IMF economists, including Jacques Polak, to change their frame of analysis for a more global vision. At the political level, it was endorsed by G77 and participated in the G10 agreement for universal distribution of the newly created Special Drawing Rights (SDRs). Based on international organizations' archives, this paper, therefore, challenges the invisibilization process of the G10 over G77 ideas. Multilateral negotiations also offer a "keyhole" to study new economist figures from developing countries. Thanks to prosopographic methodology, this paper attempts to follow the national and international connections of the experts as a way to open new research areas for the history of economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphaël Orange-Leroy, 2023. "UNCTAD experts as an intellectual basis for developing countries' involvement in the reform of the international monetary system. Paper presented at the Summer Institute of the Center for the History ," Post-Print hal-04498357, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04498357
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04498357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04498357/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauro Boianovsky, 2012. "Celso Furtado and the Structuralist-Monetarist Debate on Economic Stabilization in Latin America," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 44(2), pages 277-330, Summer.
    2. Yasutoshi Noshita, 2015. "International Liquidity Problems in the 1960s: The Examination of the Minutes of the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund," Studies in Economic History, in: Kazuhiko Yago & Yoshio Asai & Masanao Itoh (ed.), History of the IMF, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 95-124, Springer.
    3. Rosselli, Annalisa, 2017. "Richard Kahn And The Stabilization Of Commodity Prices," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 483-501, December.
    4. Des Gasper, 2011. "Pioneering the Human Development Revolution: Analysing the Trajectory of Mahbub ul Haq," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 433-456.
    5. A. W. Coats, 1978. "Economists in Government: A Research Field for the Historian of Economics," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 298-314, Summer.
    6. A. W. Coats, 1981. "Britain: the Rise of the Specialists," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 365-404, Fall.
    7. K. N. Raj & A. K. Sen, 1961. "Alternative Patterns Of Growth Under Conditions Of Stagnant Export Earnings," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 43-52.
    8. Marieke Louis & Lucile Maertens, 2021. "Why International Organizations Hate Politics : Depoliticizing the World," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03187782, HAL.
    9. Puntigliano, Andrés Rivarola & Appelqvist, Örjan, 2011. "Prebisch and Myrdal: development economics in the core and on the periphery," Journal of Global History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 29-52, March.
    10. McKenzie,Francine, 2020. "GATT and Global Order in the Postwar Era," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108494892, November.
    11. Luca Fantacci & Maria Cristina Marcuzzo & Annalisa Rosselli & Eleonora Sanfilippo, 2012. "Speculation and buffer stocks: The legacy of Keynes and Kahn," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 453-473, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waterbury, John, 1999. "The Long Gestation and Brief Triumph of Import-Substituting Industrialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 323-341, February.
    2. Edward Nelson, 2019. "Karl Brunner and U.K. Monetary Debate," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2019-004, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Crivelli, Pramila & Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona, 2021. "Separating the Political from the Economic: The Russia–Traffic in Transit Panel Report," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 582-605, October.
    4. Gabriel Porcile, 2024. "Rethinking International Relations and Development in Times of Uncertainty," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 55(2), pages 331-347, March.
    5. M. Ali Khan & Tapan Mitra, 2005. "On choice of technique in the Robinson–Solow–Srinivasan model," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 1(2), pages 83-110, June.
    6. Paul Streeten, 1985. "Development Economics: The Intellectual Divisions," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 235-247, Jul-Sep.
    7. Nelson, Douglas, 2021. "How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria? US – Countervailing Measures (China) (21.5)," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 556-565, October.
    8. Frank Veneroso & Mark Pasquali, 2021. "The Souk Al-Manakh: The Anatomy of a Pure Price-Chasing Bubble," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_987, Levy Economics Institute.
    9. André Roncaglia de Carvalho & Carlos Eduardo Suprinyak, 2022. "An emigrant economist in the tropics: Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen on Brazilian inflation and development," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(3), pages 561-579.
    10. Chee, Liberty, 2023. "The Problem of Domestic Work at the International Labour Organization," SocArXiv bfm3s, Center for Open Science.
    11. Jonas Rama, 2022. "On Celso Furtado and the French influences found in his development economics," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 293-318, July.
    12. Meghnad Desai, 2001. "Amartya Sen's Contribution to Development Economics," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 213-223.
    13. Pablo G Bortz, 2023. "Keynes’s theories of the business cycle: evolution and contemporary relevance," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 47(4), pages 835-852.
    14. Robert Wolfe, 2022. "Is using trade policy for foreign policy a “SNO job”? On linkage, friend-shoring and the challenges for multilateralism," RSCAS Working Papers 2022/74, European University Institute.
    15. Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona Paulsen & Saggi, Kamal & Mavroidis, Petros C., 2024. "The National Security Exception at the WTO: should it just be a matter of when members can avail of it? What about how?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121352, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Alexander Baturo & Julia Gray, 2024. "Leaders in the United Nations General Assembly: Revitalization or politicization?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 721-752, October.
    17. de Carvalho, André Roncaglia, 2024. "The development of the sawtooth wages model of inflation," SocArXiv 68p2b, Center for Open Science.
    18. Steven Pressman & Gale Summerfield, 2000. "The Economic Contributions of Amartya Sen," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 89-113.
    19. Bronwyn Croxson, 1998. "From private club to professional network: An economic history of the Health Economists' Study Group, 1972–1997," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(S1), pages 9-45, August.
    20. Daniel Schiffman, 2014. "Richard Kahn and Israeli Economic Policy, 1957 and 1962," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 31-73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Diplomatic History; Economic History; International Relations; History of Political Economy; United Nations; UNCTAD; IMF; World Bank; G77; G10; G24; Global South; Periphery; Third World; Money; Finance; Development; Development Finance; Special Drawing Rights; SDRs; economists; 1960s; 1970s;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04498357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.