Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
    This study investigated the effect of irradiation with an erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser and coating with silica on the surface characteristics, bond strength, and flexural strength of dental zirconia. Three hundred... more
    This study investigated the effect of irradiation with an erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser and coating with silica on the surface characteristics, bond strength, and flexural strength of dental zirconia. Three hundred and forty-three standard zirconia specimens were created, and 49 were assigned to each of seven surface treatment groups: (i) no treatment; Er:YAG laser (80 mJ/2 Hz) with pulse widths of 50 μs (ii), 100 μs (iii), 300 μs (iv), or 600 μs (v); or tribochemical silica coating at the partially sintered stage (vi) or after sintering was complete (vii). All specimens were sintered after the surface treatments, except for the group in which specimens were sintered before treatment. The study outcomes were roughness, surface loss, microshear bond strength (μSBS), and biaxial flexural strength (BFS). Mean roughness and surface loss values were significantly higher in specimens from irradiated groups than in those from silica-coated groups. Regarding μSBS, after aging, specimens from all experimental groups presented very low and similar μSBS values, irrespective of the surface treatment. Silica coating after sintering yielded the highest BFS (1149.5 ± 167.6 MPa), while coating partially sintered specimens with silica resulted a BFS (826.9 ± 60.9 MPa) similar to that of the untreated control group (794.9 ± 101.7 MPa). Laser treatments, irrespective of pulse width used, significantly decreased the BFS. In the group treated with laser at 300 μs pulse width, specimens exhibited the lowest BFS value (514.1 ± 71.5 MPa). Adhesion to zirconia was not stable after aging, regardless of the surface treatment implemented.
    PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the effect of erosive, abrasive, and erosive/abrasive challenges on the glaze layer of ceramic materials. METHODS Ninety-five samples of monolithic zirconia (MZ) (LuxaCam Zircon HT-Plus) and lithium... more
    PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the effect of erosive, abrasive, and erosive/abrasive challenges on the glaze layer of ceramic materials. METHODS Ninety-five samples of monolithic zirconia (MZ) (LuxaCam Zircon HT-Plus) and lithium disilicate (LD) (IPS e.max CAD) were divided according to the response variables: Surface roughness and surface loss (n = 10), evaluated with optical profilometry; surface topography, with scanning electron microscopy SEM (n = 3); and biofilm deposition, with microbiological assay (n = 5). The evaluations were performed in three different time evaluations: (a) Sintered, (b) Glaze, and (c) Challenge (Erosion, Abrasion, and Erosion/Abrasion). Erosion consisted in immersing specimens in HCl solution, abrasion was performed with brushing machine, and erosion/abrasion consisted of a combination of the two previous protocols. Data were analyzed with parametric tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS MZ glaze layer presented significantly higher surface roughness (P = 0.00), surface loss (P = 0.03), and biofilm deposition (P = 0.00) than LD. Abrasion and erosion/abrasion showed similar outcomes, generating significantly higher surface roughness (P = 0.00), surface loss (P = 0.00), and biofilm deposition (P = 0.01) than erosion. CONCLUSIONS Glaze layer properties were altered by the challenges, with abrasion and erosion/abrasion generating higher surface roughness, surface loss, and biofilm deposition than erosion. A significant correlation was found between the surface roughness and biofilm deposition. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The glaze layer is susceptible to challenges, especially to abrasion and erosion/abrasion, which generated greater surface roughness and surface loss than erosion. The greater surface roughness lead to a greater biofilm deposition on the glaze layer.
    Objetivo: Analisar efeitos de diferentes envelhecimentos sobre a rugosidade e a cor de cimentos de ionômero de vidro (CIV) encapsulados. Materiais e métodos: Foram testados dois cimentos de ionômero de vidro [convencional/ Self Cure (SC)... more
    Objetivo: Analisar efeitos de diferentes envelhecimentos sobre a rugosidade e a cor de cimentos de ionômero de vidro (CIV) encapsulados. Materiais e métodos: Foram testados dois cimentos de ionômero de vidro [convencional/ Self Cure (SC) e resino modificado/Light Cure (LC)] e envelhecimentos [(baseline, pós-ciclagem térmica e pós- -ciclagem térmica + armazenamento por sete meses)]. 52 discos (n = 13) foram confeccionados. A cor foi avaliada por dois espectrofotômetros (VITA Easyshade e Konica Minolta CE3700A), e a rugosidade pelo perfilômetro óptico (Proscan 2100, Scantron). Resultados: ANOVA dois fatores e teste de Tukey (p < 0,05) foram realizados. Os CIVs apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre si (p < 0,05) para rugosidade (SC = 0,202 μm e LC = 0,241), os envelhecimentos alteraram significativamente a rugosidade baseline = 0,278 μm, ciclado = 0,220 μm e ciclado-armazenado = 0,167 μm, e para cor (SC ΔE = 3,89 e o LC ΔE = 4,94). Para ΔL*, Δa*, Δb* houve ...
    Abstract This study evaluated the effects of different Er:YAG laser pulse width protocols on surface roughness, loss of volume of the material, and the step height formed of pre-sintered yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia... more
    Abstract This study evaluated the effects of different Er:YAG laser pulse width protocols on surface roughness, loss of volume of the material, and the step height formed of pre-sintered yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (Y-TZP) by three-dimensional profilometric assessment. Blocks of pre-sintered Y-TZP were cut providing 63 standard 5-mm-thick samples which were divided by surface treatment, as follows (n = 9): G50 (100 mJ/10 Hz/1 W-50 μs); G100 (−100 μs); G300 (−300 μs); G600 (−600 μs); G1000 (−1000 μs); GTC (tribochemical silica coating); and GNC (untreated). After treated or not, samples were sintered according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Roughness, volume loss and step height were analyzed by 3D profilometric assessment with confocal laser microscopy. ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05) detected that irradiated groups showed increased roughness in the groups G50, G100, G300, and G600 when compared to GTC and GNC groups. The G1000 group showed a completely flat and unfavorable surface for retention. The groups G50, G100, and G300 showed great loss of volume and the step height formed, which can lead to a gap on the crowns. In G600 was observed satisfactory roughness with little loss of volume and the step height formed similar to GTC. Irrespective of laser protocol, any of the specimens showed the presence of cracks. It is suggested that the pulse width 600 μs (G600) is the most suitable pulse width protocol as an alternative surface treatment, promoting micro-retention, with little loss of volume of material, comparable to silica coating treatment.