Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Charles Cox

For what good it will probably not do, I just filed this objection to any proposed order that has yet to be submitted as ordered by the kangaroo court. Evidently, court orders, rules and laws are not required to be followed by lying... more
For what good it will probably not do, I just filed this objection to any proposed order that has yet to be submitted as ordered by the kangaroo court.  Evidently, court orders, rules and laws are not required to be followed by lying lawyers.
When considering the destruction of the administrative State and setting aside the Chevron Deference in Loper Broght v. Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce; look to both these cases helping to neuter deep state administrative authority.
$35,000,000 settlement; Lorraine Brown to prison; cover up of mortgage fraud and fabrication of documents that still plagues hundreds of thousands of mortgages today. It took a whistleblower to bring this Mortgage Document Fabrication... more
$35,000,000 settlement; Lorraine Brown to prison; cover up of mortgage fraud and fabrication of documents that still plagues hundreds of thousands of mortgages today.

It took a whistleblower to bring this Mortgage Document Fabrication Fraud.

Just the cost of doing (monkey) business for these criminals.
U.S. Supreme Court Case SEC v Jarkesy 7th Amendmemnt Rights June
Thought it necessary to file this because the court still has defendants' motion to strike scheduled for Friday even though, this is the first time I have ever seen a court do this after an amended complaint was timely filed which renders... more
Thought it necessary to file this because the court still has defendants' motion to strike scheduled for Friday even though, this is the first time I have ever seen a court do this after an amended complaint was timely filed which renders the motion to strike moot.  This "court" never ceases to amaze how the rule of law and due process means nothing.
I cannot let their lies go unanswered; no tacit acknowledgement/agreement here...

Whatever they claim you're doing, is exactly what THEY are doing...
The "court" still has the motion to strike on calendar, even though I've filed the first amended complaint.  There are some shenanigans going on here.
Typically, there's no need to address these but there were just too many lies, rhetoric and bullshit in ZBS' CMC Stmt to leave it alone... not that the judge will do anything about it anyway... still, can't leave lies unchallenged or... more
Typically, there's no need to address these but there were just too many lies, rhetoric and bullshit in ZBS' CMC Stmt to leave it alone... not that the judge will do anything about it anyway... still, can't leave lies unchallenged or they'll be deemed tacitly acknowledged (except when they fail to deny anything ... speaking of two-tier justice)... If their lips are moving or paper is being filed; they're lying...
Writ Petition to vacate lis pendens expungement order which was issued SUA SPONTE by this judge when no one motioned to do so ...

The judge is prosecuting this case for the defense.
Case management statement required except by corrupt, lying lawyers who never show up or do anything they're supposed to and the "court" lets them get away with it.  Evasion of service a mainstay of foreclosure-mill attorneys.
Because the court failed to cancel the hearing on defendants' motion to strike the complaint and declaration of nonmonetary status after I timely filed the First Amended Complaint as they are supposed to, it seemed prudent to get on the... more
Because the court failed to cancel the hearing on defendants' motion to strike the complaint and declaration of nonmonetary status after I timely filed the First Amended Complaint as they are supposed to, it seemed prudent to get on the record, an opposition to the Motion and failure to cancel the hearing.

As you can see from the Opposition; the Motion to Strike the Complaint was rendered Moot by the First Amended Complaint; and there is no authority for filing a motion to strike a timely Opposition to Declaration of Nonmonetary Status; particularly by lying lawyers who are not the "Trustee under the Deed of Trust" that was rescinded as a matter of law in 2007.

Fake paperwork, corrupt court and criminal lawyers... our "justice system" has failed and is irredeemable.
Since the judge rubber stamped defendants' BS motion to set aside their defaults and allowed them to file a motion to strike (which is not allowed according to statute; nothing new in this "court) I was forced to file a FAC to address... more
Since the judge rubber stamped defendants' BS motion to set aside their defaults and allowed them to file a motion to strike (which is not allowed according to statute; nothing new in this "court) I was forced to file a FAC to address issues that would not have been necessary if we had gone to the default prove up hearing but here we are.
This is the kind of garbage you get from criminals and lying lawyers. Ask them to prove up their own claims, they feed you objections and bullshit. Very similar to what we're all facing from the controlling corporate class who spew lies... more
This is the kind of garbage you get from criminals and lying lawyers.  Ask them to prove up their own claims, they feed you objections and bullshit.

Very similar to what we're all facing from the controlling corporate class who spew lies about what you're doing when it is THEY who are doing exactly what they are accusing you of.

Blame the victim for your own criminal actions... 

Yeah, look at my requests compared to their "responses" (all objections... no actual response and not one document produced).
Proposed Order... untimely, not in compliance with Court Rules, in violation of the Court Order... doesn't matter, judge signed it anyway...

The corruption in courts continues
Motion not authorized, judicial notice irrelevant... does not matter, judge rubber stamps clerk's draft of Ruling anyway despite the Motion not being authorized as a matter of law and no review of the request for judicial notice... more
Motion not authorized, judicial notice irrelevant... does not matter, judge rubber stamps clerk's draft of Ruling anyway despite the Motion not being authorized as a matter of law and no review of the request for judicial notice notwithstanding.

The judicial corruption condones lying lawyer corruption being part and parcel of the corporate judicial controlling class
The infirmities in the "judge's" Orders are detailed in this declaration. Court does not read the papers, rulings and orders written by clerks with comprehension issues and stamped with signatures of "judges" who deny due process, fail... more
The infirmities in the "judge's" Orders are detailed in this declaration.  Court does not read the papers, rulings and orders written by clerks with comprehension issues and stamped with signatures of "judges" who deny due process, fail to follow the law or even their own rules.

The corruption of the "judicial-corporate-control-class" of Satanic thieves is complete.
Motion for Reconsideration of bogus order, for what good it will do. Judge rubber stamps lying lawyers motion; orders expungement of Lis Pendens sua sponte no less, which was not requested nor motioned for. The corruption and ineptitude... more
Motion for Reconsideration of bogus order, for what good it will do.

Judge rubber stamps lying lawyers motion; orders expungement of Lis Pendens sua sponte no less, which was not requested nor motioned for.

The corruption and ineptitude in these "courts" is astounding and nothing is ever done about it.

The land grab continues unabated.

Supporting declaration with most the information being posted shortly.
Deep State AI in progress against we the people, stealing our properties in their never ending land-grab
Defendants are still allowed to file papers while they're in default...
Evidently, the Court Rules do not apply to foreclosure mill lawyers who apparently can do anything they want, whenever they want and the judges let them get away with it. That, and judges in particularly foreclosure cases, can act as a... more
Evidently, the Court Rules do not apply to foreclosure mill lawyers who apparently can do anything they want, whenever they want and the judges let them get away with it.  That, and judges in particularly foreclosure cases, can act as a prosecutor and issue orders sua sponte, as they see fit even if no one has requested or filed a motion for relief.  Never ceases to amaze.
Their motion should never have been allowed to be filed in the first place.  Lies, lies and more lies...
They absolutely refuse to provide statutorily compliant responses to discovery
Request for Line From Rocio T. Hernandez's Notary Public Journal
Fedorova, ProSe, files this Motion to Strike Affidavit of Penny Mac Loan Services, LLC ("PennyMac") for lack of foundation; hearsay; false statements; filed in bad faith and with unclean hands to prevent Fedorova from examination of the... more
Fedorova, ProSe, files this Motion to Strike Affidavit of Penny Mac Loan Services, LLC ("PennyMac") for lack of foundation; hearsay; false statements; filed in bad faith and with unclean hands to prevent Fedorova from examination of the REAL financial documents and real witness-an accountant or bookkeeper of alleged Creditor who has personal knowledge about any payments for alleged "debt and receipt and distribution of money. Fedorova requests to exclude Herlinda Peregrina as a "witness" under Rules 607 & 615 due to her lack of personal knowledge, lack of credibility, speculations and false statements. Fedorova also requests a Judicial Notice per R.201 to relevant laws and cases filed and decided by other Courts.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Servicer") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting... more
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the "Servicer") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to it under paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"), as set forth in Exhibit A hereto. The transactions covered by this report include transactions listed in Exhibit B, for which the Servicer's Wells Fargo Home Mortgage division acted as the primary servicer of residential mortgage loans, other than the servicing of such loans for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and affiliates, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, or a Federal Home Loan Bank (but including the servicing of loans for FHLB Shared Funding securitizations) (the "Platform"); 2. The Servicer has engaged certain vendors, which are not deemed to be servicers as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB (the "Vendors"), to perform specific, limited or scripted activities for the Reporting Period, and the Servicer has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria or portion of the servicing criteria applicable to such Vendors' activities as set forth on Exhibit A hereto; 3. Except as set forth in paragraph 4 below, the Servicer used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the applicable servicing criteria; 4. The criteria listed in the column titled "Inapplicable Servicing Criteria" on Exhibit A hereto are inapplicable to the Servicer based on the activities it performs, directly or through its Vendors, with respect to the Platform; 5. The Servicer has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole; 6. The Servicer has not identified and is not aware of any material instance of noncompliance by the Vendors with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015, or for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole; 7. The Servicer has not identified any material deficiency in its policies and procedures to monitor the compliance by the Vendors with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2015, or for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole; 8. With respect to applicable servicing criterion 1122(d)(1)(v), the Servicer has assessed compliance for all transactions and securities in the Platform, including those issued on or before November 23, 2015, for which compliance was previously assessed under other servicing criteria in accordance with the SEC Division of Corporation Finance's Manual of Publicly Available Interpretations on Regulation AB and Related Rules, Interpretation 11.03, as applicable, for the entire Reporting Period as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015; and 9. KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Servicer's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Reporting Period.
Fabricated indictments based on false and insufficient evidence presented to grand juries by prosecutors, police, and judges who abuse the jurors' ignorance of the law and untrained and uncritical judgment, and reciprocally cover up their... more
Fabricated indictments based on false and insufficient evidence presented to grand juries by prosecutors, police, and judges who abuse the jurors' ignorance of the law and untrained and uncritical judgment, and reciprocally cover up their dereliction of honest service and due process duties ‡ The proposal to expose the abusers through UNPRECEDENTED CITIZENS HEARINGS. ‡ A. Jointly exposing the fabricators of indictments and those who cover for them
It needed more editing but ran out of patience and time.
This judge just can't help himself from interfering with this case. He is NOT the assigned judge although a former judge in the previous case who showed extreme bias and continues with his prejudice in this case. He does not read the... more
This judge just can't help himself from interfering with this case.  He is NOT the assigned judge although a former judge in the previous case who showed extreme bias and continues with his prejudice in this case.  He does not read the files or simply fails to comprehend what he's reading and does not care.  He also interfered by denying the lis pendens earlier in the case (again, he's not the assigned judge).  The unlawful land-grab perpetuated by compromised judges continues unabated.  There is no rule of law anymore, if ever there was.
Second of three defendants entry of default filed.
Defendant defaulted by not responding to the verified complaint.  No doubt a ploy to keep from having to respond to discovery as well.
Initial wrongful foreclosure complaint.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OPINION JUDGEMENT REVERSED AND REMANDED
Judge ignores ours; even though mandatory.  The law means nothing in these cases.
What a crock...
Google’s new global censorship tool was introduced today at 9:10 a.m. via an email press release.
Ridiculous bunch of unintelligible BS.  Someone is obviously being paid by the hour...

And 161 more

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OPENING BRIEF Homeowner files an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of California based on new evidence proving fraud on the Court since U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. did not own... more
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OPENING BRIEF

Homeowner files an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of California based on new evidence proving fraud on the Court since U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. did not own an alleged note when they filed a proof of claim ( POC ) in Bankruptcy Court but rather the note was held by the Federal National Association ( " Fannie Mae" ) and no evidence exists that it was assigned and/or transfered to U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., allegedly acting as a Trustee for an alleged Trust, nor the Certificate Holders of said Trust.