Domain Names: Global Practice and Procedure is a major looseleaf which provides regularly updated... more Domain Names: Global Practice and Procedure is a major looseleaf which provides regularly updated coverage of a subject critical to the future of e-commerce. Using a country-by-country format, it clearly explains the law and procedure relevant to domain name registration, ...
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore the extent to which e-books fit the needs of me... more Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore the extent to which e-books fit the needs of medical academics of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in the performance of their academic tasks. Design/methodology/approach – A web-based survey was distributed to all UNSW academics in medicine, and 224 completed responses were analyzed according to the attributes of a task-technology fit (TTF) model developed for e-books in academic settings. Findings – Although the UNSW Library had access to > 225,000 e-books, usage by medical academics was relatively low (38 per cent); however, most (92 per cent) predicted that they would be using e-books within the next five years. Nearly two-thirds (65 per cent) had portable devices including smartphones, and 90 per cent rated the ability to search across full text in an e-book of moderate-to-high importance. Research tasks dominated the use of e-books, and 71 per cent agreed that e-books helped improve their overall productivity. Research limitation/implications – Only 224 (8 per cent) of 2,790 medical academics at UNSW participated in the study. The low response rate and over-representation of research only academics limit the extent of generalization of the findings. Originality/value – This is the first study on the use of e-books among academics in the Faculty of Medicine – comprising nearly 64 per cent of all UNSW academic staff. The findings highlight the extent of e-books used by medical academics and their enthusiasm for access to digital resources. There is also the suggestion that the library must continue to develop services to ensure delivery of task-compatible e-books to medical academics in increasingly mobile environments.
During the last decades, the emergence of Bibliometrics and the progress in Pain research have le... more During the last decades, the emergence of Bibliometrics and the progress in Pain research have led to a proliferation of bibliometric studies on the medical and scientific literature of pain (B/P). This study charts the evolution of the B/P literature published during the last 30 years. Using various searching techniques, 189 B/P studies published from 1993 to August 2022 were collected for analysis—half were published since 2018. Most of the selected B/P publications use classic bibliometric analysis of Pain in toto, while some focus on specific types of Pain with Headache/Migraine, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, and Cancer Pain dominating. Each study is characterized by the origin (geographical, economical, institutional, …) and the medical/scientific context over a specified time span to provide a detailed landscape of the Pain research literature. Some B/P studies have been developed to pinpoint difficulties in appropriately identifying the Pain literature or to highlight some gen...
Background and Aims: The development of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) represents ... more Background and Aims: The development of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) represents an advance in the evaluation of neuropathic pain (NP) because prior available instruments were either unspecific or just focused on its diagnosis. Aim: To provide preliminary results of the psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the NPSI. Methods: 548 patients with moderate to severe (NPSI total score ≥ 50) NP (pure or combined) were evaluated in a twostage epidemiologic survey. Evaluations, separated by 60 days, included the NPSI, the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (NPQ) and the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS). Analyses included principal component analysis with varimax rotation, calculation of standardized Cronbach’s alpha (aS) coefficients for total and factor scores to assess internal consistency, and the area under the ROC curve (AURC) versus the discriminant function score of the NPQ and a 30% reduction of total NPS score to evaluate responsivity. Analyses of construct validity are in progress. Results: The Spanish items of NPSI had very good global (aS = 0.90) and factor (evoked pain aS = 0.80, pressive pain aS = 0.82, paroxysmal pain aS = 0.76, abnormal sensations aS = 0.87) internal consistence. The original factor structure was reproduced, albeit the electric shocks item showed also a relevant factorial load within the (original) single-item burning pain factor. Responsivity was also good, with AURC values of 0.86 and 0.85 versus the NPQ and NPS, respectively. Discussion: The Spanish NPSI is reliable, valid, and comparable to its original version.
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the a... more This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit:
This research measures the quantity, quality and extent of international collaboration of cancer ... more This research measures the quantity, quality and extent of international collaboration of cancer research publications in Australian states from 1994-1998 through citation analysis. Journal publications (with at least one Australian author) of the cancer literature from Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index were analyzed. For the five-year period, New South Wales (NSW) produced the most publications (31%), slightly ahead of Victoria (VIC) with 29%; Queensland (QLD) ranked third (14%) and South Australia (SA) fourth with 11%. However, as measured by mean journal impact factor, the publications from NSW were of overall lower quality than those from VIC, SA, QLD, and from Australia as a whole. When standardized for quality against the national average, and adjusted for state size, the publication output of the four larger states are ranked in order: SA >> VIC >> QLD > NSW. Four measures of international collaboration on publications were investigated ...
This paper examines aspects of journal articles published from 1967 to 2008, located in eight dat... more This paper examines aspects of journal articles published from 1967 to 2008, located in eight databases, and authored or co-authored by academics serving for at least two years in Australian LIS programs from 1959 to 2008. These aspects are: inclusion of publications in databases, publications in journals, authorship characteristics of publications, productivity, and subject content of publications over time. Results indicate that national and LIS-specific databases provided adequate coverage; however, no single database provided over half of all publications. More than half of all articles were published in national journals focusing on aspects of LIS in Australia; however, there is a trend for increasing publications in international journals. Most of the earlier publications had one author, but multiple authorship in publications has increased since 1999. Overall the number of publications per LIS academic is low; however, per capita productivity has been increasing since the mid...
Domain Names: Global Practice and Procedure is a major looseleaf which provides regularly updated... more Domain Names: Global Practice and Procedure is a major looseleaf which provides regularly updated coverage of a subject critical to the future of e-commerce. Using a country-by-country format, it clearly explains the law and procedure relevant to domain name registration, ...
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore the extent to which e-books fit the needs of me... more Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore the extent to which e-books fit the needs of medical academics of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in the performance of their academic tasks. Design/methodology/approach – A web-based survey was distributed to all UNSW academics in medicine, and 224 completed responses were analyzed according to the attributes of a task-technology fit (TTF) model developed for e-books in academic settings. Findings – Although the UNSW Library had access to > 225,000 e-books, usage by medical academics was relatively low (38 per cent); however, most (92 per cent) predicted that they would be using e-books within the next five years. Nearly two-thirds (65 per cent) had portable devices including smartphones, and 90 per cent rated the ability to search across full text in an e-book of moderate-to-high importance. Research tasks dominated the use of e-books, and 71 per cent agreed that e-books helped improve their overall productivity. Research limitation/implications – Only 224 (8 per cent) of 2,790 medical academics at UNSW participated in the study. The low response rate and over-representation of research only academics limit the extent of generalization of the findings. Originality/value – This is the first study on the use of e-books among academics in the Faculty of Medicine – comprising nearly 64 per cent of all UNSW academic staff. The findings highlight the extent of e-books used by medical academics and their enthusiasm for access to digital resources. There is also the suggestion that the library must continue to develop services to ensure delivery of task-compatible e-books to medical academics in increasingly mobile environments.
During the last decades, the emergence of Bibliometrics and the progress in Pain research have le... more During the last decades, the emergence of Bibliometrics and the progress in Pain research have led to a proliferation of bibliometric studies on the medical and scientific literature of pain (B/P). This study charts the evolution of the B/P literature published during the last 30 years. Using various searching techniques, 189 B/P studies published from 1993 to August 2022 were collected for analysis—half were published since 2018. Most of the selected B/P publications use classic bibliometric analysis of Pain in toto, while some focus on specific types of Pain with Headache/Migraine, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, and Cancer Pain dominating. Each study is characterized by the origin (geographical, economical, institutional, …) and the medical/scientific context over a specified time span to provide a detailed landscape of the Pain research literature. Some B/P studies have been developed to pinpoint difficulties in appropriately identifying the Pain literature or to highlight some gen...
Background and Aims: The development of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) represents ... more Background and Aims: The development of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) represents an advance in the evaluation of neuropathic pain (NP) because prior available instruments were either unspecific or just focused on its diagnosis. Aim: To provide preliminary results of the psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the NPSI. Methods: 548 patients with moderate to severe (NPSI total score ≥ 50) NP (pure or combined) were evaluated in a twostage epidemiologic survey. Evaluations, separated by 60 days, included the NPSI, the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (NPQ) and the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS). Analyses included principal component analysis with varimax rotation, calculation of standardized Cronbach’s alpha (aS) coefficients for total and factor scores to assess internal consistency, and the area under the ROC curve (AURC) versus the discriminant function score of the NPQ and a 30% reduction of total NPS score to evaluate responsivity. Analyses of construct validity are in progress. Results: The Spanish items of NPSI had very good global (aS = 0.90) and factor (evoked pain aS = 0.80, pressive pain aS = 0.82, paroxysmal pain aS = 0.76, abnormal sensations aS = 0.87) internal consistence. The original factor structure was reproduced, albeit the electric shocks item showed also a relevant factorial load within the (original) single-item burning pain factor. Responsivity was also good, with AURC values of 0.86 and 0.85 versus the NPQ and NPS, respectively. Discussion: The Spanish NPSI is reliable, valid, and comparable to its original version.
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the a... more This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit:
This research measures the quantity, quality and extent of international collaboration of cancer ... more This research measures the quantity, quality and extent of international collaboration of cancer research publications in Australian states from 1994-1998 through citation analysis. Journal publications (with at least one Australian author) of the cancer literature from Science Citation Index and Social Sciences Citation Index were analyzed. For the five-year period, New South Wales (NSW) produced the most publications (31%), slightly ahead of Victoria (VIC) with 29%; Queensland (QLD) ranked third (14%) and South Australia (SA) fourth with 11%. However, as measured by mean journal impact factor, the publications from NSW were of overall lower quality than those from VIC, SA, QLD, and from Australia as a whole. When standardized for quality against the national average, and adjusted for state size, the publication output of the four larger states are ranked in order: SA >> VIC >> QLD > NSW. Four measures of international collaboration on publications were investigated ...
This paper examines aspects of journal articles published from 1967 to 2008, located in eight dat... more This paper examines aspects of journal articles published from 1967 to 2008, located in eight databases, and authored or co-authored by academics serving for at least two years in Australian LIS programs from 1959 to 2008. These aspects are: inclusion of publications in databases, publications in journals, authorship characteristics of publications, productivity, and subject content of publications over time. Results indicate that national and LIS-specific databases provided adequate coverage; however, no single database provided over half of all publications. More than half of all articles were published in national journals focusing on aspects of LIS in Australia; however, there is a trend for increasing publications in international journals. Most of the earlier publications had one author, but multiple authorship in publications has increased since 1999. Overall the number of publications per LIS academic is low; however, per capita productivity has been increasing since the mid...
Uploads
Papers by Concepcion Wilson