In Chapter-I, where the first step of the main subject of “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories”... more In Chapter-I, where the first step of the main subject of “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories” is given in the previous section, information, understanding-meaning, understanding, orientation-direction, preparation- management of the research process, determination of the methods and techniques to be used in the steps, analysis and evaluation of the data are necessary in order to work in an ideal or near-ideal way. The ground-breaking concepts, theories and approaches are studied.
In the context of the main topic “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories”, defining the problem area and summarizing its approach to the issue will be useful in introduction to Chapter-II of the study.
In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilities that it exhibits on the ground of its differentiations and changes over time. When these spaces are considered in the context of the city and the citizen; It is seen that the city has different memory layers and sustainability degrees in different sub-regions, which have different presentations.
In the city and the urban factory, the ones that can be selected depending on the time, depending on the conditions that can occur, the completions, and the continuation of the device conversion cannot be compensated in positive or negative examples, and cannot show themselves with estimations.
The main subject of the study exhibits a multifaceted, multifactorial situation. For these reasons, the subject is handled with an interdisciplinary approach.
As it can be understood from the summary explanation given, the subject has been discussed in the context of the theoretical ground in Chapter-I, in line with the determined scope. Chapter-I is detailed in the sub-headings of Urban Memory and Memories; Concepts -Theories That Ground Memory, Related Definitions, Concepts, Theories; Perceiving-Perception, Perception Process Social Perception-Factors Affecting Perception; Phenomenology-Factual/ Eventual Psychology; Living Space, Lived Space; Action Theory; Syntagmatic Identity; Interruption/Disconnection and Continuity/Sustainability.
In Chapter-II, where the second step of the main subject of "Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories", the original research based on the location, takes place, the location and history of Trabzon, an overview of the change regeneration in Trabzon, in the process of examining the Trabzon City sampling; It is discussed within the scope of time-dependent changes and evaluations, and then the research process related to the Trabzon City detail study area: Atapark Region are studied. The work done in the detailed study area; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; The physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations oftheAtapark Region are discussed in a way that leads to conclusions and suggestions.
In short, in accordance with the scope described above, in Chapter 2; in the context of the theoretical ground, there is the research carried out in the sampling of the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city.
To elaborate on the purpose of the research; It is the revealing of the permanent, weakened or erased traces of Atapark and its surroundings in the collective memory through the memories dialogue. Memories were traced in the Atapark Region in line with all the qualities in the context of the physical and social environment. The dialogue between the city space/ATAPARK and memories; It was researched with qualitative research method and the subject was basically approached from a phenomenological point of view. In the context of the main subject; urban architecture/city/urban space and urban/individual interactions, presentations, are analyzed and evaluated in stages within the framework of determined areas of interest.
In the study, an overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; time-dependent changes/urban memory, collective memory, collective memory, urban memory and in the context of the evaluations of these phenomena in the title of sustainability continuity, in the relation/ground of the selected study area; The subject, which expresses one of the secondary aims of the study as seeking an explanation for the questions of perceived urban regeneration in Turkey, applied/ performed regeneration/urban regeneration errors, how they can be explained, finds an explanation in this section.
In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilit... more In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilities that it exhibits on the ground of its differentiations and changes over time. When these spaces are considered in the context of the city and the citizen; It is seen that the city has different memory layers and sustainability degrees in different sub-regions, which have different presentations.
...
In line with the scope described above, the subject is; In the context of the theoretical ground, the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and is in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city, will be discussed in/Chapter-II with the scope of the research.
In the study, Urban Memory and Memories: Concepts-Theories Forming the Ground for Memories (Perception, perception process, dimensions, factors affecting them, action theory, syntactic identity, interruption/break, and continuity/sustainability); The Case of Living and Lived Space in the Relationship of Memories (Living Space, Live Space) and Dialogue Between Urban, Urban Space/ATAPARK and Memories: (The location and history of Trabzon, and overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; evaluations within the scope of time-dependent changes; Trabzon Detalied study area of the city: Atapark Region; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations of Atapark Region) are studied under main and sub-titles.
...
MODERN CAMİLERDE MİHRAP DUVARI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME, 2019
İslamiyet’te camiler, kutsal ve simgesel mekanlar olarak benimsenmiş ibadet yapılarıdır. Esasında... more İslamiyet’te camiler, kutsal ve simgesel mekanlar olarak benimsenmiş ibadet yapılarıdır. Esasında camiler; Müslümanların toplanarak ibadet ettikleri, bunun yanı sıra bilgi paylaşımında bulundukları, eğitimin gerçekleştiği ve adalet işlerinin yürüdüğü karma kullanımlı mekanlardır. İlk ibadet mekanı Hz. Muhammed’in evi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Zamanla mekan gereksinimiyle camiler, ilk oluşumlarını göstermeye başlamış; dünyevi olanın dünyada kalacağına ve ahirete olan inanç, cami mimarisinin şekillenmesinde etkili olmuştur. Her dönemde coğrafi, iklimsel ve kültürel koşullarla siyasi yönetimlere bağlı olarak mevcut teknik imkanlar doğrultusunda gelişen cami mimarisi; zamanla belirli simgesel eleman ve biçimsel ifadelerle kalıplaşmış, tasarım açısından gelişimi kısıtlanmış ve klasik bir mimariye sabitlenmiştir. Bu klasik anlayış içinde var olan simgesel elemanlardan biri de mihraptır. Kıble yönünü işaret eden ve ibadeti yöneten imamın yerini vurgulayan mihrap, yüklendiği anlamsal boyutuyla da klasik cami mimarisinin en önemli unsurlarındandır. Kıble duvarı içine bir niş yerleştirilmesiyle oluşan mihrabın bu formu günümüze kadar değiştirilmeden ulaşmıştır. Günümüzde değişen ve gelişen teknolojik imkânlara ve malzeme olanaklarına rağmen geleneksel tasarımın ikon haline geldiği, çağdaş yorumların katılmadığı, kopya ve kimliksiz camiler inşa edilmektedir. Çağdaş yorumların katıldığı tasarımlar ise toplumun bazı kesimleri tarafından kabul görmezken, yenilik arayışı içinde olan kesimler için ilgi çekicidir. Bu çalışma kapsamında, günümüz malzeme ve teknolojisinin kullanıldığı 21. yüzyıl camileri ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada, farklı ve çağdaş yorumlarıyla klasik anlayışın dışına çıkan modern camilerin mihrap duvarı özelinde analiz edilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla, 2000 yılı ve sonrası, yurt içi ve dışında inşa edilmiş örnekler seçilerek, modern camilerde mihrabın kıble duvarındaki konumu ve niteliğinin yanı sıra tasarımcı tarafından nasıl ele alındığı araştırılmıştır.
AN ARCHITECT ON THE MOVE - AN ARCHITECTURE ON THE STAGE: RE-READING BRUNO TAUT, 2019
Many concepts such as population growth, economic crises, revolutions, wars, unemployment, immigr... more Many concepts such as population growth, economic crises, revolutions, wars, unemployment, immigration and refugee movements forced the act of producing architecture, away from its original purpose, into an endeavor to build characterless and spiritless buildings which are actually incompatible with the context, isolated from their places, not alive but nonetheless serve as forced habitats. Within this fact and in reference to the Livenarch-VI’s theme of “Replacing Architecture”, “the uprooted architects” who are expatriated and lived abroad, and the buildings they produced are certainly worthy of debate. In this aim, the proposed paper intends to lead to a discussion within the framework of the congress, on the architecture of Bruno Taut, who was considered as a “stateless architect”, and who stayed in numerous locations including Koenigsberg (East Prussia), Hamburg, Wiesbaden, Magdeburg, Berlin, (Germany), Osaka, Tokyo (Japan), Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, Trabzon (Turkey) through years, due to various political, social and economic reasons. Taut left his mark in every place he lived in, even Turkey, which he often called “the land of Sinan”. He was an architect “who did not belong to a single place”, and who had addressed even today as he approached the architectural problems of his era with specific references to his day. In his discourses, Taut developed as solutions for existing problems; he discussed architecture based on the “spirit of the place” and universal solution proposals for the “replacing architects and architecture”, which arose out of the problems of the day. Through his opposition to the codification of absolute rules for construction, he offered different perspectives towards the architectural thought of the modern era, and built a synthesis of traditional-modern architecture. He claimed that architecture is a universal language, that formal and dogmatic architecture is simply unacceptable in a perspective of architecture in harmony with the humanity. With a view to understand and explain Bruno Taut on the basis of “place”, “emotions”, “spirit” and “essence”, the authors came up with the method of “production of concepts”. A number of concepts including “background” (Taut’s design philosophy), “betweenness” (the balance Taut established between science and art, past and future, transparent and opaque), “openendedness” (Taut’s flexible, creative and legible solutions) and “retrospection” (Taut’s various spaces which allow and enable the accumulation of memories on part of the individual) were proposed by the authors. The architectural perspective that does not require a move to find itself a suitable background, one that was nonetheless proposed by an architect who did his share of moving around was discussed with reference to the universal thought system, principles and concepts considered the legacy of the architect and architecture.
Mimarlık mesleği en yaygın tanımıyla “yaşanabilir çevre yaratma sanatı” olarak ifade edilmektedir... more Mimarlık mesleği en yaygın tanımıyla “yaşanabilir çevre yaratma sanatı” olarak ifade edilmektedir. Mimar, hem sanatçı hem bilim insanı nitelikleriyle doğrudan insan hayatına etki eden bir meslek insanıdır. Bir tasarım probleminde mimarın Vitruvius (M.Ö. 33-14)’un bahsettiği üç temel amaçtan Venustas (Güzellik) yönüyle sanatı, Firmitas (Dayanıklılık) ve Utilitas (İşlevsellik) yönüyle bilimi; bir başka deyişle mimari bir ürünün tüm yönlerini karşılaması, problemin çözümünde yaratıcı düşünceyi etkin kullanması ile mümkündür. Çalışmada problem olarak görülen mimarlık pratiğindeki ürünlerin tekdüzeleşmesi sorunu temelde mimari ürünün estetik yönünün karşılanmadığı düşüncesine dayanmaktadır. Sağlamlık, işlevsellik ve temelde ekonomi gibi mimarlığın sanatsal yönünün dışında kalan niteliklerin estetik ve yaşanabilir çevre ihtiyacının önüne geçmesi, mimarlık ürününün seri üretim nesnesine dönüşmesi sorunları üretici olarak mimar ve sonuç ürün olarak mimari ürün açısından, Trabzon ilinde faaliyet gösteren serbest mimarların bakış açısı ile araştırılmaktadır. Yaratıcı birey- yaratıcı ürün arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanan çalışma sonucunda mimarlık pratiğinde bireyin yaratıcı niteliklere sahip olsa dahi yaratıcı ürünün ortaya konmasında tek başına yeterli olmadığı, birey dışında etkili faktörlerin olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.
In Chapter-I, where the first step of the main subject of “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories”... more In Chapter-I, where the first step of the main subject of “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories” is given in the previous section, information, understanding-meaning, understanding, orientation-direction, preparation- management of the research process, determination of the methods and techniques to be used in the steps, analysis and evaluation of the data are necessary in order to work in an ideal or near-ideal way. The ground-breaking concepts, theories and approaches are studied.
In the context of the main topic “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories”, defining the problem area and summarizing its approach to the issue will be useful in introduction to Chapter-II of the study.
In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilities that it exhibits on the ground of its differentiations and changes over time. When these spaces are considered in the context of the city and the citizen; It is seen that the city has different memory layers and sustainability degrees in different sub-regions, which have different presentations.
In the city and the urban factory, the ones that can be selected depending on the time, depending on the conditions that can occur, the completions, and the continuation of the device conversion cannot be compensated in positive or negative examples, and cannot show themselves with estimations.
The main subject of the study exhibits a multifaceted, multifactorial situation. For these reasons, the subject is handled with an interdisciplinary approach.
As it can be understood from the summary explanation given, the subject has been discussed in the context of the theoretical ground in Chapter-I, in line with the determined scope. Chapter-I is detailed in the sub-headings of Urban Memory and Memories; Concepts -Theories That Ground Memory, Related Definitions, Concepts, Theories; Perceiving-Perception, Perception Process Social Perception-Factors Affecting Perception; Phenomenology-Factual/ Eventual Psychology; Living Space, Lived Space; Action Theory; Syntagmatic Identity; Interruption/Disconnection and Continuity/Sustainability.
In Chapter-II, where the second step of the main subject of "Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories", the original research based on the location, takes place, the location and history of Trabzon, an overview of the change regeneration in Trabzon, in the process of examining the Trabzon City sampling; It is discussed within the scope of time-dependent changes and evaluations, and then the research process related to the Trabzon City detail study area: Atapark Region are studied. The work done in the detailed study area; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; The physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations oftheAtapark Region are discussed in a way that leads to conclusions and suggestions.
In short, in accordance with the scope described above, in Chapter 2; in the context of the theoretical ground, there is the research carried out in the sampling of the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city.
To elaborate on the purpose of the research; It is the revealing of the permanent, weakened or erased traces of Atapark and its surroundings in the collective memory through the memories dialogue. Memories were traced in the Atapark Region in line with all the qualities in the context of the physical and social environment. The dialogue between the city space/ATAPARK and memories; It was researched with qualitative research method and the subject was basically approached from a phenomenological point of view. In the context of the main subject; urban architecture/city/urban space and urban/individual interactions, presentations, are analyzed and evaluated in stages within the framework of determined areas of interest.
In the study, an overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; time-dependent changes/urban memory, collective memory, collective memory, urban memory and in the context of the evaluations of these phenomena in the title of sustainability continuity, in the relation/ground of the selected study area; The subject, which expresses one of the secondary aims of the study as seeking an explanation for the questions of perceived urban regeneration in Turkey, applied/ performed regeneration/urban regeneration errors, how they can be explained, finds an explanation in this section.
In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilit... more In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilities that it exhibits on the ground of its differentiations and changes over time. When these spaces are considered in the context of the city and the citizen; It is seen that the city has different memory layers and sustainability degrees in different sub-regions, which have different presentations.
...
In line with the scope described above, the subject is; In the context of the theoretical ground, the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and is in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city, will be discussed in/Chapter-II with the scope of the research.
In the study, Urban Memory and Memories: Concepts-Theories Forming the Ground for Memories (Perception, perception process, dimensions, factors affecting them, action theory, syntactic identity, interruption/break, and continuity/sustainability); The Case of Living and Lived Space in the Relationship of Memories (Living Space, Live Space) and Dialogue Between Urban, Urban Space/ATAPARK and Memories: (The location and history of Trabzon, and overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; evaluations within the scope of time-dependent changes; Trabzon Detalied study area of the city: Atapark Region; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations of Atapark Region) are studied under main and sub-titles.
...
MODERN CAMİLERDE MİHRAP DUVARI ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME, 2019
İslamiyet’te camiler, kutsal ve simgesel mekanlar olarak benimsenmiş ibadet yapılarıdır. Esasında... more İslamiyet’te camiler, kutsal ve simgesel mekanlar olarak benimsenmiş ibadet yapılarıdır. Esasında camiler; Müslümanların toplanarak ibadet ettikleri, bunun yanı sıra bilgi paylaşımında bulundukları, eğitimin gerçekleştiği ve adalet işlerinin yürüdüğü karma kullanımlı mekanlardır. İlk ibadet mekanı Hz. Muhammed’in evi olarak kabul edilmiştir. Zamanla mekan gereksinimiyle camiler, ilk oluşumlarını göstermeye başlamış; dünyevi olanın dünyada kalacağına ve ahirete olan inanç, cami mimarisinin şekillenmesinde etkili olmuştur. Her dönemde coğrafi, iklimsel ve kültürel koşullarla siyasi yönetimlere bağlı olarak mevcut teknik imkanlar doğrultusunda gelişen cami mimarisi; zamanla belirli simgesel eleman ve biçimsel ifadelerle kalıplaşmış, tasarım açısından gelişimi kısıtlanmış ve klasik bir mimariye sabitlenmiştir. Bu klasik anlayış içinde var olan simgesel elemanlardan biri de mihraptır. Kıble yönünü işaret eden ve ibadeti yöneten imamın yerini vurgulayan mihrap, yüklendiği anlamsal boyutuyla da klasik cami mimarisinin en önemli unsurlarındandır. Kıble duvarı içine bir niş yerleştirilmesiyle oluşan mihrabın bu formu günümüze kadar değiştirilmeden ulaşmıştır. Günümüzde değişen ve gelişen teknolojik imkânlara ve malzeme olanaklarına rağmen geleneksel tasarımın ikon haline geldiği, çağdaş yorumların katılmadığı, kopya ve kimliksiz camiler inşa edilmektedir. Çağdaş yorumların katıldığı tasarımlar ise toplumun bazı kesimleri tarafından kabul görmezken, yenilik arayışı içinde olan kesimler için ilgi çekicidir. Bu çalışma kapsamında, günümüz malzeme ve teknolojisinin kullanıldığı 21. yüzyıl camileri ele alınmıştır. Çalışmada, farklı ve çağdaş yorumlarıyla klasik anlayışın dışına çıkan modern camilerin mihrap duvarı özelinde analiz edilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla, 2000 yılı ve sonrası, yurt içi ve dışında inşa edilmiş örnekler seçilerek, modern camilerde mihrabın kıble duvarındaki konumu ve niteliğinin yanı sıra tasarımcı tarafından nasıl ele alındığı araştırılmıştır.
AN ARCHITECT ON THE MOVE - AN ARCHITECTURE ON THE STAGE: RE-READING BRUNO TAUT, 2019
Many concepts such as population growth, economic crises, revolutions, wars, unemployment, immigr... more Many concepts such as population growth, economic crises, revolutions, wars, unemployment, immigration and refugee movements forced the act of producing architecture, away from its original purpose, into an endeavor to build characterless and spiritless buildings which are actually incompatible with the context, isolated from their places, not alive but nonetheless serve as forced habitats. Within this fact and in reference to the Livenarch-VI’s theme of “Replacing Architecture”, “the uprooted architects” who are expatriated and lived abroad, and the buildings they produced are certainly worthy of debate. In this aim, the proposed paper intends to lead to a discussion within the framework of the congress, on the architecture of Bruno Taut, who was considered as a “stateless architect”, and who stayed in numerous locations including Koenigsberg (East Prussia), Hamburg, Wiesbaden, Magdeburg, Berlin, (Germany), Osaka, Tokyo (Japan), Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, Trabzon (Turkey) through years, due to various political, social and economic reasons. Taut left his mark in every place he lived in, even Turkey, which he often called “the land of Sinan”. He was an architect “who did not belong to a single place”, and who had addressed even today as he approached the architectural problems of his era with specific references to his day. In his discourses, Taut developed as solutions for existing problems; he discussed architecture based on the “spirit of the place” and universal solution proposals for the “replacing architects and architecture”, which arose out of the problems of the day. Through his opposition to the codification of absolute rules for construction, he offered different perspectives towards the architectural thought of the modern era, and built a synthesis of traditional-modern architecture. He claimed that architecture is a universal language, that formal and dogmatic architecture is simply unacceptable in a perspective of architecture in harmony with the humanity. With a view to understand and explain Bruno Taut on the basis of “place”, “emotions”, “spirit” and “essence”, the authors came up with the method of “production of concepts”. A number of concepts including “background” (Taut’s design philosophy), “betweenness” (the balance Taut established between science and art, past and future, transparent and opaque), “openendedness” (Taut’s flexible, creative and legible solutions) and “retrospection” (Taut’s various spaces which allow and enable the accumulation of memories on part of the individual) were proposed by the authors. The architectural perspective that does not require a move to find itself a suitable background, one that was nonetheless proposed by an architect who did his share of moving around was discussed with reference to the universal thought system, principles and concepts considered the legacy of the architect and architecture.
Mimarlık mesleği en yaygın tanımıyla “yaşanabilir çevre yaratma sanatı” olarak ifade edilmektedir... more Mimarlık mesleği en yaygın tanımıyla “yaşanabilir çevre yaratma sanatı” olarak ifade edilmektedir. Mimar, hem sanatçı hem bilim insanı nitelikleriyle doğrudan insan hayatına etki eden bir meslek insanıdır. Bir tasarım probleminde mimarın Vitruvius (M.Ö. 33-14)’un bahsettiği üç temel amaçtan Venustas (Güzellik) yönüyle sanatı, Firmitas (Dayanıklılık) ve Utilitas (İşlevsellik) yönüyle bilimi; bir başka deyişle mimari bir ürünün tüm yönlerini karşılaması, problemin çözümünde yaratıcı düşünceyi etkin kullanması ile mümkündür. Çalışmada problem olarak görülen mimarlık pratiğindeki ürünlerin tekdüzeleşmesi sorunu temelde mimari ürünün estetik yönünün karşılanmadığı düşüncesine dayanmaktadır. Sağlamlık, işlevsellik ve temelde ekonomi gibi mimarlığın sanatsal yönünün dışında kalan niteliklerin estetik ve yaşanabilir çevre ihtiyacının önüne geçmesi, mimarlık ürününün seri üretim nesnesine dönüşmesi sorunları üretici olarak mimar ve sonuç ürün olarak mimari ürün açısından, Trabzon ilinde faaliyet gösteren serbest mimarların bakış açısı ile araştırılmaktadır. Yaratıcı birey- yaratıcı ürün arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanan çalışma sonucunda mimarlık pratiğinde bireyin yaratıcı niteliklere sahip olsa dahi yaratıcı ürünün ortaya konmasında tek başına yeterli olmadığı, birey dışında etkili faktörlerin olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.
Uploads
In the context of the main topic “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories”, defining the problem area and summarizing its approach to the issue will be useful in introduction to Chapter-II of the study.
In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilities that it exhibits on the ground of its differentiations and changes over time. When these spaces are considered in the context of the city and the citizen; It is seen that the city has different memory layers and sustainability degrees in different sub-regions, which have different presentations.
In the city and the urban factory, the ones that can be selected depending on the time, depending on the conditions that can occur, the completions, and the continuation of the device conversion cannot be compensated in positive or negative examples, and cannot show themselves with estimations.
The main subject of the study exhibits a multifaceted, multifactorial situation. For these reasons, the subject is handled with an interdisciplinary approach.
As it can be understood from the summary explanation given, the subject has been discussed in the context of the theoretical ground in Chapter-I, in line with the determined scope. Chapter-I is detailed in the sub-headings of Urban Memory and Memories; Concepts -Theories That Ground Memory, Related Definitions, Concepts, Theories; Perceiving-Perception, Perception Process Social Perception-Factors Affecting Perception; Phenomenology-Factual/ Eventual Psychology; Living Space, Lived Space; Action Theory; Syntagmatic Identity; Interruption/Disconnection and Continuity/Sustainability.
In Chapter-II, where the second step of the main subject of "Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories", the original research based on the location, takes place, the location and history of Trabzon, an overview of the change regeneration in Trabzon, in the process of examining the Trabzon City sampling; It is discussed within the scope of time-dependent changes and evaluations, and then the research process related to the Trabzon City detail study area: Atapark Region are studied. The work done in the detailed study area; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; The physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations oftheAtapark Region are discussed in a way that leads to conclusions and suggestions.
In short, in accordance with the scope described above, in Chapter 2; in the context of the theoretical ground, there is the research carried out in the sampling of the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city.
To elaborate on the purpose of the research; It is the revealing of the permanent, weakened or erased traces of Atapark and its surroundings in the collective memory through the memories dialogue. Memories were traced in the Atapark Region in line with all the qualities in the context of the physical and social environment. The dialogue between the city space/ATAPARK and memories; It was researched with qualitative research method and the subject was basically approached from a phenomenological point of view. In the context of the main subject; urban architecture/city/urban space and urban/individual interactions, presentations, are analyzed and evaluated in stages within the framework of determined areas of interest.
In the study, an overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; time-dependent changes/urban memory, collective memory, collective memory, urban memory and in the context of the evaluations of these phenomena in the title of sustainability continuity, in the relation/ground of the selected study area; The subject, which expresses one of the secondary aims of the study as seeking an explanation for the questions of perceived urban regeneration in Turkey, applied/ performed regeneration/urban regeneration errors, how they can be explained, finds an explanation in this section.
...
In line with the scope described above, the subject is; In the context of the theoretical ground, the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and is in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city, will be discussed in/Chapter-II with the scope of the research.
In the study, Urban Memory and Memories: Concepts-Theories Forming the Ground for Memories (Perception, perception process, dimensions, factors affecting them, action theory, syntactic identity, interruption/break, and continuity/sustainability); The Case of Living and Lived Space in the Relationship of Memories (Living Space, Live Space) and Dialogue Between Urban, Urban Space/ATAPARK and Memories: (The location and history of Trabzon, and overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; evaluations within the scope of time-dependent changes; Trabzon Detalied study area of the city: Atapark Region; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations of Atapark Region) are studied under main and sub-titles.
...
Taut left his mark in every place he lived in, even Turkey, which he often called “the land of Sinan”. He was an architect “who did not belong to a single place”, and who had addressed even today as he approached the architectural problems of his era with specific references to his day. In his discourses, Taut developed as solutions for existing problems; he discussed architecture based on the “spirit of the place” and universal solution proposals for the “replacing architects and architecture”, which arose out of the problems of the day. Through his opposition to the codification of absolute rules for construction, he offered different perspectives towards the architectural thought of the modern era, and built a synthesis of traditional-modern architecture. He claimed that architecture is a universal language, that formal and dogmatic architecture is simply unacceptable in a perspective of architecture in harmony with the humanity. With a view to understand and explain Bruno Taut on the basis of “place”, “emotions”, “spirit” and “essence”, the authors came up with the method of “production of concepts”. A number of concepts including “background” (Taut’s design philosophy), “betweenness” (the balance Taut established between science and art, past and future, transparent and opaque), “openendedness” (Taut’s flexible, creative and legible solutions) and “retrospection” (Taut’s various spaces which allow and enable the accumulation of memories on part of the individual) were proposed by the authors. The architectural perspective that does not require a move to find itself a suitable background, one that was nonetheless proposed by an architect who did his share of moving around was discussed with reference to the universal thought system, principles and concepts considered the legacy of the architect and architecture.
Çalışmada problem olarak görülen mimarlık pratiğindeki ürünlerin tekdüzeleşmesi sorunu temelde mimari ürünün estetik yönünün karşılanmadığı düşüncesine dayanmaktadır. Sağlamlık, işlevsellik ve temelde ekonomi gibi mimarlığın sanatsal yönünün dışında kalan niteliklerin estetik ve yaşanabilir çevre ihtiyacının önüne geçmesi, mimarlık ürününün seri üretim nesnesine dönüşmesi sorunları üretici olarak mimar ve sonuç ürün olarak mimari ürün açısından, Trabzon ilinde faaliyet gösteren serbest mimarların bakış açısı ile araştırılmaktadır. Yaratıcı birey- yaratıcı ürün arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanan çalışma sonucunda mimarlık pratiğinde bireyin yaratıcı niteliklere sahip olsa dahi yaratıcı ürünün ortaya konmasında tek başına yeterli olmadığı, birey dışında etkili faktörlerin olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.
In the context of the main topic “Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories”, defining the problem area and summarizing its approach to the issue will be useful in introduction to Chapter-II of the study.
In the formation of spaces; There are different chances/misfortunes or possibilities/impossibilities that it exhibits on the ground of its differentiations and changes over time. When these spaces are considered in the context of the city and the citizen; It is seen that the city has different memory layers and sustainability degrees in different sub-regions, which have different presentations.
In the city and the urban factory, the ones that can be selected depending on the time, depending on the conditions that can occur, the completions, and the continuation of the device conversion cannot be compensated in positive or negative examples, and cannot show themselves with estimations.
The main subject of the study exhibits a multifaceted, multifactorial situation. For these reasons, the subject is handled with an interdisciplinary approach.
As it can be understood from the summary explanation given, the subject has been discussed in the context of the theoretical ground in Chapter-I, in line with the determined scope. Chapter-I is detailed in the sub-headings of Urban Memory and Memories; Concepts -Theories That Ground Memory, Related Definitions, Concepts, Theories; Perceiving-Perception, Perception Process Social Perception-Factors Affecting Perception; Phenomenology-Factual/ Eventual Psychology; Living Space, Lived Space; Action Theory; Syntagmatic Identity; Interruption/Disconnection and Continuity/Sustainability.
In Chapter-II, where the second step of the main subject of "Dialogue of Urban Spaces and Memories", the original research based on the location, takes place, the location and history of Trabzon, an overview of the change regeneration in Trabzon, in the process of examining the Trabzon City sampling; It is discussed within the scope of time-dependent changes and evaluations, and then the research process related to the Trabzon City detail study area: Atapark Region are studied. The work done in the detailed study area; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; The physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations oftheAtapark Region are discussed in a way that leads to conclusions and suggestions.
In short, in accordance with the scope described above, in Chapter 2; in the context of the theoretical ground, there is the research carried out in the sampling of the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city.
To elaborate on the purpose of the research; It is the revealing of the permanent, weakened or erased traces of Atapark and its surroundings in the collective memory through the memories dialogue. Memories were traced in the Atapark Region in line with all the qualities in the context of the physical and social environment. The dialogue between the city space/ATAPARK and memories; It was researched with qualitative research method and the subject was basically approached from a phenomenological point of view. In the context of the main subject; urban architecture/city/urban space and urban/individual interactions, presentations, are analyzed and evaluated in stages within the framework of determined areas of interest.
In the study, an overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; time-dependent changes/urban memory, collective memory, collective memory, urban memory and in the context of the evaluations of these phenomena in the title of sustainability continuity, in the relation/ground of the selected study area; The subject, which expresses one of the secondary aims of the study as seeking an explanation for the questions of perceived urban regeneration in Turkey, applied/ performed regeneration/urban regeneration errors, how they can be explained, finds an explanation in this section.
...
In line with the scope described above, the subject is; In the context of the theoretical ground, the ATAPARK Region, which is selected as the study area in Trabzon and is in a relationship with the other sub-regions of the city, will be discussed in/Chapter-II with the scope of the research.
In the study, Urban Memory and Memories: Concepts-Theories Forming the Ground for Memories (Perception, perception process, dimensions, factors affecting them, action theory, syntactic identity, interruption/break, and continuity/sustainability); The Case of Living and Lived Space in the Relationship of Memories (Living Space, Live Space) and Dialogue Between Urban, Urban Space/ATAPARK and Memories: (The location and history of Trabzon, and overview of the change-regeneration in Trabzon; evaluations within the scope of time-dependent changes; Trabzon Detalied study area of the city: Atapark Region; research process: subject-questions-methods and techniques; physical-spatial, social-spatial analysis and evaluations of Atapark Region) are studied under main and sub-titles.
...
Taut left his mark in every place he lived in, even Turkey, which he often called “the land of Sinan”. He was an architect “who did not belong to a single place”, and who had addressed even today as he approached the architectural problems of his era with specific references to his day. In his discourses, Taut developed as solutions for existing problems; he discussed architecture based on the “spirit of the place” and universal solution proposals for the “replacing architects and architecture”, which arose out of the problems of the day. Through his opposition to the codification of absolute rules for construction, he offered different perspectives towards the architectural thought of the modern era, and built a synthesis of traditional-modern architecture. He claimed that architecture is a universal language, that formal and dogmatic architecture is simply unacceptable in a perspective of architecture in harmony with the humanity. With a view to understand and explain Bruno Taut on the basis of “place”, “emotions”, “spirit” and “essence”, the authors came up with the method of “production of concepts”. A number of concepts including “background” (Taut’s design philosophy), “betweenness” (the balance Taut established between science and art, past and future, transparent and opaque), “openendedness” (Taut’s flexible, creative and legible solutions) and “retrospection” (Taut’s various spaces which allow and enable the accumulation of memories on part of the individual) were proposed by the authors. The architectural perspective that does not require a move to find itself a suitable background, one that was nonetheless proposed by an architect who did his share of moving around was discussed with reference to the universal thought system, principles and concepts considered the legacy of the architect and architecture.
Çalışmada problem olarak görülen mimarlık pratiğindeki ürünlerin tekdüzeleşmesi sorunu temelde mimari ürünün estetik yönünün karşılanmadığı düşüncesine dayanmaktadır. Sağlamlık, işlevsellik ve temelde ekonomi gibi mimarlığın sanatsal yönünün dışında kalan niteliklerin estetik ve yaşanabilir çevre ihtiyacının önüne geçmesi, mimarlık ürününün seri üretim nesnesine dönüşmesi sorunları üretici olarak mimar ve sonuç ürün olarak mimari ürün açısından, Trabzon ilinde faaliyet gösteren serbest mimarların bakış açısı ile araştırılmaktadır. Yaratıcı birey- yaratıcı ürün arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanan çalışma sonucunda mimarlık pratiğinde bireyin yaratıcı niteliklere sahip olsa dahi yaratıcı ürünün ortaya konmasında tek başına yeterli olmadığı, birey dışında etkili faktörlerin olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.