Some reflections on the epistemological fundaments of an Italian action-research experience. AI & Soc 18, 44–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0273-y, 2014
this article has been published in AI&Society with the following reference:
Garibaldo, F., Rebec... more this article has been published in AI&Society with the following reference:
Garibaldo, F., Rebecchi, E. Some reflections on the epistemological fundaments of an Italian action-research experience. AI & Soc 18, 44–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0273-y
Keywords 1. EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEMS The experience matured between 1984 and 2001 raises numerous epistemological problems. We shall pause to look at three issues that have shaped a study, partially internal to MET and partially developing between the two authors, in the course of time. The three issues, in the historical order they arose in, are A. On what basis is a cognitive collaboration between psychoanalysis and social research possible? B. What cognitive relationship is created between the subject and the research object within the perspective of an action-research? C. What weight does manipulation have within the perspective of the action-research? Of these three, the most 'scandalous' is definitely the third, not usually the subject of an explicit study; the most studied, in the history of thought, is definitely the second; one that is not very conceptualised is the first. We do not aim to review the literature here, which should be interdisciplinary concerning any of the three questions. Thus, we shall analyse our own, which from time to time will recall those moments in the cultural debate that we know and that struck us.
Some reflections on the epistemological fundaments of an Italian action-research experience. AI & Soc 18, 44–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0273-y, 2014
this article has been published in AI&Society with the following reference:
Garibaldo, F., Rebec... more this article has been published in AI&Society with the following reference:
Garibaldo, F., Rebecchi, E. Some reflections on the epistemological fundaments of an Italian action-research experience. AI & Soc 18, 44–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0273-y
Keywords 1. EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEMS The experience matured between 1984 and 2001 raises numerous epistemological problems. We shall pause to look at three issues that have shaped a study, partially internal to MET and partially developing between the two authors, in the course of time. The three issues, in the historical order they arose in, are A. On what basis is a cognitive collaboration between psychoanalysis and social research possible? B. What cognitive relationship is created between the subject and the research object within the perspective of an action-research? C. What weight does manipulation have within the perspective of the action-research? Of these three, the most 'scandalous' is definitely the third, not usually the subject of an explicit study; the most studied, in the history of thought, is definitely the second; one that is not very conceptualised is the first. We do not aim to review the literature here, which should be interdisciplinary concerning any of the three questions. Thus, we shall analyse our own, which from time to time will recall those moments in the cultural debate that we know and that struck us.
Uploads
Garibaldo, F., Rebecchi, E. Some reflections on the epistemological fundaments of an Italian action-research experience. AI & Soc 18, 44–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0273-y
Keywords 1. EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEMS The experience matured between 1984 and 2001 raises numerous epistemological problems. We shall pause to look at three issues that have shaped a study, partially internal to MET and partially developing between the two authors, in the course of time. The three issues, in the historical order they arose in, are A. On what basis is a cognitive collaboration between psychoanalysis and social research possible? B. What cognitive relationship is created between the subject and the research object within the perspective of an action-research? C. What weight does manipulation have within the perspective of the action-research? Of these three, the most 'scandalous' is definitely the third, not usually the subject of an explicit study; the most studied, in the history of thought, is definitely the second; one that is not very conceptualised is the first. We do not aim to review the literature here, which should be interdisciplinary concerning any of the three questions. Thus, we shall analyse our own, which from time to time will recall those moments in the cultural debate that we know and that struck us.
Garibaldo, F., Rebecchi, E. Some reflections on the epistemological fundaments of an Italian action-research experience. AI & Soc 18, 44–67 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-003-0273-y
Keywords 1. EPISTEMOLOGICAL PROBLEMS The experience matured between 1984 and 2001 raises numerous epistemological problems. We shall pause to look at three issues that have shaped a study, partially internal to MET and partially developing between the two authors, in the course of time. The three issues, in the historical order they arose in, are A. On what basis is a cognitive collaboration between psychoanalysis and social research possible? B. What cognitive relationship is created between the subject and the research object within the perspective of an action-research? C. What weight does manipulation have within the perspective of the action-research? Of these three, the most 'scandalous' is definitely the third, not usually the subject of an explicit study; the most studied, in the history of thought, is definitely the second; one that is not very conceptualised is the first. We do not aim to review the literature here, which should be interdisciplinary concerning any of the three questions. Thus, we shall analyse our own, which from time to time will recall those moments in the cultural debate that we know and that struck us.