... World Health Organization Geneva 1999 DEPARTMENT OF VACCINES AND BIOLOGICALS Issues relating ... more ... World Health Organization Geneva 1999 DEPARTMENT OF VACCINES AND BIOLOGICALS Issues relating to the use of BCG in immunization programmes A discussion document Paul EM Fine 1 Ilona AM Carneiro 1 Julie B. Milstien 2 C. John Clements 3 ...
Food and Drug Administration requirements for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs), processing... more Food and Drug Administration requirements for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs), processing of ADR reports, and actions in response to these reports are described. FDA requires that drug manufacturers report ADRs to the FDA Division of Epidemiology and Surveillance; 90% of the ADR reports received are from manufacturers. Of the remaining 10%, one third are from pharmacists. FDA regulations were revised in 1985 to specifically define reportable ADRs and procedures for reporting; manufacturers are required to report within 15 days reactions that are serious and unlabeled. For newly approved drugs, reports on ADRs must be submitted quarterly for three years; subsequently, annual reporting is required. Any increase in the frequency of serious, labeled reactions must be reported. Serious reactions not listed in the product labeling must be reported for products marketed before 1962 for which new drug applications or abbreviated new drug applications were not filed. ADR information received by FDA is coded into standard terms and entered in a computerized database for evaluation by reviewers. If an important reaction is suspected, the report is entered in a tracking system for further monitoring. ADR reports may result in requirements for changes in product labeling, "Dear Doctor" letters, requirement of further study by the manufacturer, or withdrawal of the product. Information about ADRs is communicated to health-care practitioners in product labeling and in the literature. Pharmacists are encouraged to report suspected serious and unlabeled reactions to FDA so that the medical community and the public can benefit from current information about drug safety.
In 1982, the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and the manufacturer ... more In 1982, the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and the manufacturer created a surveillance system to monitor spontaneous reports of adverse events occurring after inoculation with the new plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine (Heptavax-B, Merck Sharp and Dohme, West Point, PA). In the three years between June 1, 1982 and May 31, 1985, an estimated 850,000 persons received the vaccine. During that period, a total of 41 reports were received for one of the following neurologic adverse events: convulsions (five cases), Bell's palsy (10 cases), Guillain-Barré syndrome (nine cases), lumbar radiculopathy (five cases), brachial plexus neuropathy (three cases), optic neuritis (five cases), and transverse myelitis (four cases). Half of these occurred after the first of three required vaccine doses. There were no deaths. Calculation of the relative risks of these illnesses after hepatitis B vaccination was highly dependent on diagnostic classification of the cases, estimates of the size of the vaccinated population, background incidence of the diseases, and the length and distribution of the hypothetical at-risk interval used in the analysis. Other factors important in judging the results of the study could not be measured, including underreporting. In some analyses, Guillain-Barré syndrome was reported significantly more often than expected (p less than 0.05, Poisson probability distribution). However, no conclusive epidemiologic association could be made between any neurologic adverse event and the vaccine. Even if such an association did exist, the preventive benefits of the vaccine in persons at high risk for hepatitis B would unequivocally outweigh the risk of any neurologic adverse event.
The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as antihypertensives has increased rapidly si... more The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as antihypertensives has increased rapidly since the introduction of captopril in 1981. Seven cases of neonatal renal failure have been reported in patients with exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors that continued to the time of delivery. Two cases resulted in death of the newborn; the other five patients recovered after peritoneal dialysis. Because the relative frequency of normal outcomes is unknown, these data are insufficient for incidence-rate estimates or risk/benefit analyses. However, given the potential neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with late-pregnancy exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, alternative therapies in the third trimester should be given consideration. If these drugs must be used in this context, the clinician should be prepared to deal with renal failure and hypotension in the newborn. The Food and Drug Administration invites reports of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with such exposure.
... D. ADU, MD CJ LOTE, Ph.D. J. MICHAEL, FRCP . JH TURNEY, MRCP P. MCMASTER, FRCS The Queen Eliz... more ... D. ADU, MD CJ LOTE, Ph.D. J. MICHAEL, FRCP . JH TURNEY, MRCP P. MCMASTER, FRCS The Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Birmingham B15 2TH, England REFERENCES 1. COHEN DJ,LOERTSCHER R, RUBIN M, TILNEY NL, CARPENTER CB, STROM TB. ...
An analysis of adverse reactions occurring after receipt of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine... more An analysis of adverse reactions occurring after receipt of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine and reported to the Food and Drug Administration during the first year of marketing of the product was performed. During the period April 1985 to May 1986, adverse reaction reports on 152 patients, excluding those of vaccine failure and concurrent infection, were received. Several adverse reactions not previously recognized, including convulsions, allergic reactions such as anaphylactoid-like and serum sickness-like reactions, and vomiting were received. The vast majority of adverse reactions were benign. Because there are many biases that result in the reporting of or failure to report an adverse reaction, it is not possible to derive a rate of reactions from these data. Furthermore, causality cannot be inferred from any single report. The data, however, indicate that, in light of widespread use of the vaccine, its use appears to be safe.
Alternative tests have a role in vaccine testing, especially to confirm production consistency. G... more Alternative tests have a role in vaccine testing, especially to confirm production consistency. Given the characteristics of these alternative tests and of the products for which they may be used, there are several factors which will influence their use. These include a good understanding of the test and the product to be tested, strong national regulatory infrastructure, a laboratory run in accordance with the principles of laboratory quality systems, and the ability to validate the alternative method. This means that national regulatory authorities will need strong expertise in epidemiology and quality assurance to complement laboratory experience.
WHO supports the concept of replacement, reduction and refinement of the use of in vivo methods f... more WHO supports the concept of replacement, reduction and refinement of the use of in vivo methods for biologicals production and control, and regularly conducts reviews of its recommended procedures to allow reduction in the use of animals. The coordination of collaborative studies, publication of standardized methods, and holding of workshops on the use of these methods contributes to their use. The neurovirulence test for oral poliovaccine is probably the single most visible animal test for which alternative methods are sought. Collaborative studies on alternative methods for screening products are currently being sponsored by WHO. The use of Vero cells rather than primary monkey kidney cells for poliovaccine production can avoid the use of many monkeys. Cell banks of Vero and HEp-2 cells have been developed by WHO, tested for virus sensitivity and freedom from adventitious agents, and are available for vaccine production and control, replacing primary animal cells. For the future, final product testing will increasingly be directed towards establishment of consistency of production rather than potency. By supporting the validation and use of this approach, WHO can effectively influence more rational animal use in biological production and control.
... World Health Organization Geneva 1999 DEPARTMENT OF VACCINES AND BIOLOGICALS Issues relating ... more ... World Health Organization Geneva 1999 DEPARTMENT OF VACCINES AND BIOLOGICALS Issues relating to the use of BCG in immunization programmes A discussion document Paul EM Fine 1 Ilona AM Carneiro 1 Julie B. Milstien 2 C. John Clements 3 ...
Food and Drug Administration requirements for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs), processing... more Food and Drug Administration requirements for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs), processing of ADR reports, and actions in response to these reports are described. FDA requires that drug manufacturers report ADRs to the FDA Division of Epidemiology and Surveillance; 90% of the ADR reports received are from manufacturers. Of the remaining 10%, one third are from pharmacists. FDA regulations were revised in 1985 to specifically define reportable ADRs and procedures for reporting; manufacturers are required to report within 15 days reactions that are serious and unlabeled. For newly approved drugs, reports on ADRs must be submitted quarterly for three years; subsequently, annual reporting is required. Any increase in the frequency of serious, labeled reactions must be reported. Serious reactions not listed in the product labeling must be reported for products marketed before 1962 for which new drug applications or abbreviated new drug applications were not filed. ADR information received by FDA is coded into standard terms and entered in a computerized database for evaluation by reviewers. If an important reaction is suspected, the report is entered in a tracking system for further monitoring. ADR reports may result in requirements for changes in product labeling, "Dear Doctor" letters, requirement of further study by the manufacturer, or withdrawal of the product. Information about ADRs is communicated to health-care practitioners in product labeling and in the literature. Pharmacists are encouraged to report suspected serious and unlabeled reactions to FDA so that the medical community and the public can benefit from current information about drug safety.
In 1982, the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and the manufacturer ... more In 1982, the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and the manufacturer created a surveillance system to monitor spontaneous reports of adverse events occurring after inoculation with the new plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine (Heptavax-B, Merck Sharp and Dohme, West Point, PA). In the three years between June 1, 1982 and May 31, 1985, an estimated 850,000 persons received the vaccine. During that period, a total of 41 reports were received for one of the following neurologic adverse events: convulsions (five cases), Bell's palsy (10 cases), Guillain-Barré syndrome (nine cases), lumbar radiculopathy (five cases), brachial plexus neuropathy (three cases), optic neuritis (five cases), and transverse myelitis (four cases). Half of these occurred after the first of three required vaccine doses. There were no deaths. Calculation of the relative risks of these illnesses after hepatitis B vaccination was highly dependent on diagnostic classification of the cases, estimates of the size of the vaccinated population, background incidence of the diseases, and the length and distribution of the hypothetical at-risk interval used in the analysis. Other factors important in judging the results of the study could not be measured, including underreporting. In some analyses, Guillain-Barré syndrome was reported significantly more often than expected (p less than 0.05, Poisson probability distribution). However, no conclusive epidemiologic association could be made between any neurologic adverse event and the vaccine. Even if such an association did exist, the preventive benefits of the vaccine in persons at high risk for hepatitis B would unequivocally outweigh the risk of any neurologic adverse event.
The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as antihypertensives has increased rapidly si... more The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as antihypertensives has increased rapidly since the introduction of captopril in 1981. Seven cases of neonatal renal failure have been reported in patients with exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors that continued to the time of delivery. Two cases resulted in death of the newborn; the other five patients recovered after peritoneal dialysis. Because the relative frequency of normal outcomes is unknown, these data are insufficient for incidence-rate estimates or risk/benefit analyses. However, given the potential neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with late-pregnancy exposure to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, alternative therapies in the third trimester should be given consideration. If these drugs must be used in this context, the clinician should be prepared to deal with renal failure and hypotension in the newborn. The Food and Drug Administration invites reports of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with such exposure.
... D. ADU, MD CJ LOTE, Ph.D. J. MICHAEL, FRCP . JH TURNEY, MRCP P. MCMASTER, FRCS The Queen Eliz... more ... D. ADU, MD CJ LOTE, Ph.D. J. MICHAEL, FRCP . JH TURNEY, MRCP P. MCMASTER, FRCS The Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Birmingham B15 2TH, England REFERENCES 1. COHEN DJ,LOERTSCHER R, RUBIN M, TILNEY NL, CARPENTER CB, STROM TB. ...
An analysis of adverse reactions occurring after receipt of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine... more An analysis of adverse reactions occurring after receipt of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine and reported to the Food and Drug Administration during the first year of marketing of the product was performed. During the period April 1985 to May 1986, adverse reaction reports on 152 patients, excluding those of vaccine failure and concurrent infection, were received. Several adverse reactions not previously recognized, including convulsions, allergic reactions such as anaphylactoid-like and serum sickness-like reactions, and vomiting were received. The vast majority of adverse reactions were benign. Because there are many biases that result in the reporting of or failure to report an adverse reaction, it is not possible to derive a rate of reactions from these data. Furthermore, causality cannot be inferred from any single report. The data, however, indicate that, in light of widespread use of the vaccine, its use appears to be safe.
Alternative tests have a role in vaccine testing, especially to confirm production consistency. G... more Alternative tests have a role in vaccine testing, especially to confirm production consistency. Given the characteristics of these alternative tests and of the products for which they may be used, there are several factors which will influence their use. These include a good understanding of the test and the product to be tested, strong national regulatory infrastructure, a laboratory run in accordance with the principles of laboratory quality systems, and the ability to validate the alternative method. This means that national regulatory authorities will need strong expertise in epidemiology and quality assurance to complement laboratory experience.
WHO supports the concept of replacement, reduction and refinement of the use of in vivo methods f... more WHO supports the concept of replacement, reduction and refinement of the use of in vivo methods for biologicals production and control, and regularly conducts reviews of its recommended procedures to allow reduction in the use of animals. The coordination of collaborative studies, publication of standardized methods, and holding of workshops on the use of these methods contributes to their use. The neurovirulence test for oral poliovaccine is probably the single most visible animal test for which alternative methods are sought. Collaborative studies on alternative methods for screening products are currently being sponsored by WHO. The use of Vero cells rather than primary monkey kidney cells for poliovaccine production can avoid the use of many monkeys. Cell banks of Vero and HEp-2 cells have been developed by WHO, tested for virus sensitivity and freedom from adventitious agents, and are available for vaccine production and control, replacing primary animal cells. For the future, final product testing will increasingly be directed towards establishment of consistency of production rather than potency. By supporting the validation and use of this approach, WHO can effectively influence more rational animal use in biological production and control.
Uploads
Papers by Julie Milstien