This presentation delivered at the international SBL in Salzburg in 2022 together with Dr. Paul Hocking. It proposes a creative way of reading the Covenant Code in the book of Exodus. Using synchronic, literary criticism of the second half of the Covenant Code. We propose the laws be read and conceived as five triads, rather than independently. The resulting construct can then be viewed as two-dimensional parallelism, or better, as a literary weave, containing warp and weft “threads” on a literary “loom.” The flow of meaning down the threads of text suggests a process of nation-building. The identification of woven composition in such texts presents new possibilities for understanding the literary context of specific laws. The meaning of any given law is a function of its place in the weave.
This video explains how the Torah was composed as a woven text and includes a detailed analysis o... more This video explains how the Torah was composed as a woven text and includes a detailed analysis of Leviticus.
N.B. The links work only in the download, not in the preview.
This is an overview of a series ... more N.B. The links work only in the download, not in the preview.
This is an overview of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was intended for a very limited audience. The specific technique employed to transmit this knowledge may seem counter intuitive. It was embedded in texts that had the broadest popular appeal. While we may envision “secret teachings” being passed by word of mouth, or in rare manuscripts, the authors we will examine had a very different approach. They, evidently, believed that compositions with the broadest possible appeal provided the best chance for the esoteric teachings to survive. So, they employed a literary device that embedded deeper meanings into popular compositions, where they waited to be understood by the few.
This is the second essay of the series Divine Writing: An Ancient Method for Preserving Esoteric... more This is the second essay of the series Divine Writing: An Ancient Method for Preserving Esoteric Knowledge
Knowledge of the divine-writing device survived at least into the third century CE. Rabbi Judah the Prince, “Rabbi” for short, composed the entire Mishnah according to the device. He embedded testimony regarding its source in what was to be his most popular composition, Pirke Avot, sometimes called “The Ethics of the Fathers.” Our second essay, “The Art of Writing the Oral Tradition” analyzes this testimony. Rabbi’s testimony in Avot is based on the esoteric reading of the Decalogue discussed in the previous essay. The esoteric reading of the Decalogue reported by Rabbi appears nowhere else. He begins by attributing the source of the reading to Mt. Sinai: “Moses received torah (a teaching) from Sinai.” It is significant that this teaching is distinct from the Torah. Rabbi incorporates the teaching in a composition designed according to the way the esoteric Decalogue is read as five consecutive pairs of Words. He presents ten aphorisms attributed to five consecutive pairs of national leaders who lived during the time of the Second Temple. Like the ten parts of the Decalogue, the ten aphorisms can be read as independent of each other. But when they are read as an integrated composition, they reveal their esoteric content.
This is the first of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was... more This is the first of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was intended for a very limited audience. The specific technique employed to transmit this knowledge may seem counter intuitive. It was embedded in texts that had the broadest popular appeal. While we may envision “secret teachings” being passed by word of mouth, or in rare manuscripts, the authors we will examine had a very different approach. They, evidently, believed that compositions with the broadest possible appeal provided the best chance for the esoteric teachings to survive. So, they employed a literary device that embedded deeper meanings into popular compositions, where they waited to be understood by the few.
The first essay, “The Decalogue is an Esoteric Composition” is taken from my book Before Chapter and Verse. It explains how the author of the Torah (referred to as “M”) associates the source of esoteric/exoteric writing with the deity. M employed the “divine writing” literary device, textual weaving, throughout the Torah. Consequently, what may be the best-known section of the Bible, contains the key for reading the entire Torah as an esoteric/exoteric composition.
This is a set of links to papers and books published over the last four decades that support the ... more This is a set of links to papers and books published over the last four decades that support the view that the Torah is a coherent composition composed by a single author or school.
This Hebrew article describes the two-dimensional literary structure of the the third chapter of ... more This Hebrew article describes the two-dimensional literary structure of the the third chapter of Mishnah Shviit. It was published in 1987 in the journal of Israeli Talmud teachers, and was my first publication.
This is one of the first articles I published (in Hebrew) on the literary structure of the Mishna... more This is one of the first articles I published (in Hebrew) on the literary structure of the Mishnah. It is especially relevant now with the publication of my book "Before Chapter and Verse: Reading the Woven Torah," because it demonstrates that the same principles of two-dimensional organization I describe in the Torah, were applied in the Mishnah as well.
קליין, משה, Moshe Kline. “The Literary Structure of the Mishnah (‘Erubin’ Chapter X) / כל חלקי הבית אחוזים זה בזה: משנת עירובין פרק עשירי.” Alei Sefer: Studies in Bibliography and in the History of the Printed and the Digital Hebrew Book / עלי ספר: מחקרים בביבליוגרפיה ובתולדות הספר העברי המודפס והדיגיטלי, no. יד (1987): 5–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24158735.
This essay is about the formal structure of Leviticus in the form of the book that we have today.... more This essay is about the formal structure of Leviticus in the form of the book that we have today. While it does not directly address historical issues related to documents that preceded its composition, it does present a new direction for approaching many textual problems. The work is based on a project that was mentored by Jacob Milgrom during the latter years of his life, for which I am deeply indebted.2 The goal of the project was to determine the principles of organization that were employed in the construction of the torah. a singular discovery led to identification of the structures of each of the five books. The discovery was that all five books are made up of well-defined literary units that share certain characteristics. specifically, each unit was built
The whole Torah divided into two-dimensional literary units with color code. Evidence of a single... more The whole Torah divided into two-dimensional literary units with color code. Evidence of a single author.
This is the full Hebrew text of the Mishnah with each chapter arranged according to its literary ... more This is the full Hebrew text of the Mishnah with each chapter arranged according to its literary structure.
2022 International Meeting of the SBL Salzburg, Austria; Stylistics and the Hebrew Bible, 2022
This paper2 suggests a new way of reading the Torah, not described in scholarly guides (such as, ... more This paper2 suggests a new way of reading the Torah, not described in scholarly guides (such as, Clines et al., 1990; Barton, 1996; Kugel, 2012), because it argues for a different way of understanding the writing. It is a literary-critical, synchronic case study of what we take to be a single literary unit in the so-called “Covenant Code” (Exod 22:17[Eng. 18]–23:19). For avoidance of doubt, the paper considers the literary composition of the extant text, not its historical composition, so it does not engage with diachronic questions addressed elsewhere (Van Seters, 2003; Levinson, 2004; Wright, 2009; Kilchör, 2013), nor with its relationship with ANE legal collections (for references, see Alexander, 2017, 447–49). The paper sets out evidence that suggests the extant form of the unit was constructed in parallel in two dimensions, and with a suasive intent that is more covenantal than legal.
This presentation delivered at the international SBL in Salzburg in 2022 together with Dr. Paul Hocking. It proposes a creative way of reading the Covenant Code in the book of Exodus. Using synchronic, literary criticism of the second half of the Covenant Code. We propose the laws be read and conceived as five triads, rather than independently. The resulting construct can then be viewed as two-dimensional parallelism, or better, as a literary weave, containing warp and weft “threads” on a literary “loom.” The flow of meaning down the threads of text suggests a process of nation-building. The identification of woven composition in such texts presents new possibilities for understanding the literary context of specific laws. The meaning of any given law is a function of its place in the weave.
This video explains how the Torah was composed as a woven text and includes a detailed analysis o... more This video explains how the Torah was composed as a woven text and includes a detailed analysis of Leviticus.
N.B. The links work only in the download, not in the preview.
This is an overview of a series ... more N.B. The links work only in the download, not in the preview.
This is an overview of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was intended for a very limited audience. The specific technique employed to transmit this knowledge may seem counter intuitive. It was embedded in texts that had the broadest popular appeal. While we may envision “secret teachings” being passed by word of mouth, or in rare manuscripts, the authors we will examine had a very different approach. They, evidently, believed that compositions with the broadest possible appeal provided the best chance for the esoteric teachings to survive. So, they employed a literary device that embedded deeper meanings into popular compositions, where they waited to be understood by the few.
This is the second essay of the series Divine Writing: An Ancient Method for Preserving Esoteric... more This is the second essay of the series Divine Writing: An Ancient Method for Preserving Esoteric Knowledge
Knowledge of the divine-writing device survived at least into the third century CE. Rabbi Judah the Prince, “Rabbi” for short, composed the entire Mishnah according to the device. He embedded testimony regarding its source in what was to be his most popular composition, Pirke Avot, sometimes called “The Ethics of the Fathers.” Our second essay, “The Art of Writing the Oral Tradition” analyzes this testimony. Rabbi’s testimony in Avot is based on the esoteric reading of the Decalogue discussed in the previous essay. The esoteric reading of the Decalogue reported by Rabbi appears nowhere else. He begins by attributing the source of the reading to Mt. Sinai: “Moses received torah (a teaching) from Sinai.” It is significant that this teaching is distinct from the Torah. Rabbi incorporates the teaching in a composition designed according to the way the esoteric Decalogue is read as five consecutive pairs of Words. He presents ten aphorisms attributed to five consecutive pairs of national leaders who lived during the time of the Second Temple. Like the ten parts of the Decalogue, the ten aphorisms can be read as independent of each other. But when they are read as an integrated composition, they reveal their esoteric content.
This is the first of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was... more This is the first of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was intended for a very limited audience. The specific technique employed to transmit this knowledge may seem counter intuitive. It was embedded in texts that had the broadest popular appeal. While we may envision “secret teachings” being passed by word of mouth, or in rare manuscripts, the authors we will examine had a very different approach. They, evidently, believed that compositions with the broadest possible appeal provided the best chance for the esoteric teachings to survive. So, they employed a literary device that embedded deeper meanings into popular compositions, where they waited to be understood by the few.
The first essay, “The Decalogue is an Esoteric Composition” is taken from my book Before Chapter and Verse. It explains how the author of the Torah (referred to as “M”) associates the source of esoteric/exoteric writing with the deity. M employed the “divine writing” literary device, textual weaving, throughout the Torah. Consequently, what may be the best-known section of the Bible, contains the key for reading the entire Torah as an esoteric/exoteric composition.
This is a set of links to papers and books published over the last four decades that support the ... more This is a set of links to papers and books published over the last four decades that support the view that the Torah is a coherent composition composed by a single author or school.
This Hebrew article describes the two-dimensional literary structure of the the third chapter of ... more This Hebrew article describes the two-dimensional literary structure of the the third chapter of Mishnah Shviit. It was published in 1987 in the journal of Israeli Talmud teachers, and was my first publication.
This is one of the first articles I published (in Hebrew) on the literary structure of the Mishna... more This is one of the first articles I published (in Hebrew) on the literary structure of the Mishnah. It is especially relevant now with the publication of my book "Before Chapter and Verse: Reading the Woven Torah," because it demonstrates that the same principles of two-dimensional organization I describe in the Torah, were applied in the Mishnah as well.
קליין, משה, Moshe Kline. “The Literary Structure of the Mishnah (‘Erubin’ Chapter X) / כל חלקי הבית אחוזים זה בזה: משנת עירובין פרק עשירי.” Alei Sefer: Studies in Bibliography and in the History of the Printed and the Digital Hebrew Book / עלי ספר: מחקרים בביבליוגרפיה ובתולדות הספר העברי המודפס והדיגיטלי, no. יד (1987): 5–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24158735.
This essay is about the formal structure of Leviticus in the form of the book that we have today.... more This essay is about the formal structure of Leviticus in the form of the book that we have today. While it does not directly address historical issues related to documents that preceded its composition, it does present a new direction for approaching many textual problems. The work is based on a project that was mentored by Jacob Milgrom during the latter years of his life, for which I am deeply indebted.2 The goal of the project was to determine the principles of organization that were employed in the construction of the torah. a singular discovery led to identification of the structures of each of the five books. The discovery was that all five books are made up of well-defined literary units that share certain characteristics. specifically, each unit was built
The whole Torah divided into two-dimensional literary units with color code. Evidence of a single... more The whole Torah divided into two-dimensional literary units with color code. Evidence of a single author.
This is the full Hebrew text of the Mishnah with each chapter arranged according to its literary ... more This is the full Hebrew text of the Mishnah with each chapter arranged according to its literary structure.
2022 International Meeting of the SBL Salzburg, Austria; Stylistics and the Hebrew Bible, 2022
This paper2 suggests a new way of reading the Torah, not described in scholarly guides (such as, ... more This paper2 suggests a new way of reading the Torah, not described in scholarly guides (such as, Clines et al., 1990; Barton, 1996; Kugel, 2012), because it argues for a different way of understanding the writing. It is a literary-critical, synchronic case study of what we take to be a single literary unit in the so-called “Covenant Code” (Exod 22:17[Eng. 18]–23:19). For avoidance of doubt, the paper considers the literary composition of the extant text, not its historical composition, so it does not engage with diachronic questions addressed elsewhere (Van Seters, 2003; Levinson, 2004; Wright, 2009; Kilchör, 2013), nor with its relationship with ANE legal collections (for references, see Alexander, 2017, 447–49). The paper sets out evidence that suggests the extant form of the unit was constructed in parallel in two dimensions, and with a suasive intent that is more covenantal than legal.
The literary coherence of the Torah indicates Elohim and YHWY are not just different, equivalent,... more The literary coherence of the Torah indicates Elohim and YHWY are not just different, equivalent, names of the deity. They are presented as distinct characters, and the differences between them are built into the structure of Genesis. YHWH is associated with what is above, the holy, transcendent, supernatural, requires offerings; YHWH expresses emotions and requires altars. Elohim, on the other hand, created the natural world and is associated with it, with what is below, the immanent, the physical. Elohim does not express emotions and does not require altars. The distinctions between form the foundation of the Torah. The following draft is the first part of an essay exploring the theology of the Torah as a function of the differences between Elohim and YHWH.
This paper reflects the conclusions of the analysis of the Torah in my book, Before Chapter and V... more This paper reflects the conclusions of the analysis of the Torah in my book, Before Chapter and Verse, available from Amazon, Barnes and Noble and others. In the book, I expand the analysis I previously applied to Leviticus and demonstrate that the same principles of woven composition identified in Leviticus were applied to the entire Torah. Here I present a "top-down" overview of the structure of the Torah as revealed by the analysis in the book, based on the representation of the Torah as a woven tapestry.
The Torah was composed by a single author to be read in two voices, one like Moses' and one like... more The Torah was composed by a single author to be read in two voices, one like Moses' and one like the Lord's. It is a "Straussian" exoteric text. This thesis is demonstrated in the two proposed volumes of "Before Chapter and Verse." The first volume demonstrates a heretofore unreported reading of the Decalogue and how it serves as a paradigm for the construction of the literary units of the Torah as well as the chapters of the Mishnah. The second volume explores the structure of the Torah in detail. This article is the first part of the first volume. It lays out the basis for exploring the Torah as a fully coherent composition, planned as an exoteric/esoteric book.
Before Chapter and Verse: Reading the Woven Torah, 2022
The prolog of Genesis (1:1-11:9) introduces multiple divine names: two individual names, Elohim a... more The prolog of Genesis (1:1-11:9) introduces multiple divine names: two individual names, Elohim and YHWH, and a combined name YHWH Elohim. Each name is connected to a line of people: Elohim is connected to “the sons of Elohim;” YHWH is connected to Cain; YHWH and Elohim are both connected to Seth, whose father was Elohim’s Adam, and mother was YHWH Elohim’s Eve. To fully appreciate the significance of these textual phenomena, one must study the woven Torah.
BEFORE CHAPTER AND VERSE: READING THE WOVEN TORAH, 2022
The Torah , as well as the rest of the Bible, was not composed in chapters and verses. It was div... more The Torah , as well as the rest of the Bible, was not composed in chapters and verses. It was divided into chapters only in the thirteenth century CE. It took another two centuries before numbered verses were used. How then was it composed? Is there any logic to the way its stories and laws were assembled? Do its five books have clearly demarcated divisions? Can the identification of such divisions lead to deeper understandings? These are among the questions that formed the basis of an extensive research project. Before Chapter and Verse, the fruit of that research, presents a surprising discovery. To read the Torah as it was written, the text must be arranged in columns and rows, as tables, or more properly, weaves. Each of the eighty-six literary units that comprise the Torah was constructed as a warp and woof, with the stone tablets of the Decalogue providing the prototype. In turn, these units were woven together in the structures that form the five books. The weaving analogy applies to both the micro level of the unit and the macro level of the books. Before Chapter and Verse provides you with the tools to read the Torah as it was woven. It includes a color-coded English translation of the Torah’s eighty-six units, presented according to their literary structures, as well as maps showing the structure of each book.
Moshe Kline is an independent researcher, who studies the literary formats of ancient Hebrew texts. His research has led to the discovery of the formal structure of the Torah, as described in this volume, as well as the structure of the Mishnah. He has published findings both in Hebrew and English books and journals. His research was mentored by Jacob Milgrom, Mary Douglas, and Léon Ashkenazi (Manitou).
Uploads
Videos by Moshe Kline
https://www.academia.edu/104299841/The_Covenant_Code_A_New_Way_of_Reading_Exodus_22_17_23_19
This presentation delivered at the international SBL in Salzburg in 2022 together with Dr. Paul Hocking. It proposes a creative way of reading the Covenant Code in the book of Exodus. Using synchronic, literary criticism of the second half of the Covenant Code. We propose the laws be read and conceived as five triads, rather than independently. The resulting construct can then be viewed as two-dimensional parallelism, or better, as a literary weave, containing warp and weft “threads” on a literary “loom.” The flow of meaning down the threads of text suggests a process of nation-building. The identification of woven composition in such texts presents new possibilities for understanding the literary context of specific laws. The meaning of any given law is a function of its place in the weave.
Papers by Moshe Kline
This is an overview of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was intended for a very limited audience. The specific technique employed to transmit this knowledge may seem counter intuitive. It was embedded in texts that had the broadest popular appeal. While we may envision “secret teachings” being passed by word of mouth, or in rare manuscripts, the authors we will examine had a very different approach. They, evidently, believed that compositions with the broadest possible appeal provided the best chance for the esoteric teachings to survive. So, they employed a literary device that embedded deeper meanings into popular compositions, where they waited to be understood by the few.
Knowledge of the divine-writing device survived at least into the third century CE. Rabbi Judah the Prince, “Rabbi” for short, composed the entire Mishnah according to the device. He embedded testimony regarding its source in what was to be his most popular composition, Pirke Avot, sometimes called “The Ethics of the Fathers.” Our second essay, “The Art of Writing the Oral Tradition” analyzes this testimony. Rabbi’s testimony in Avot is based on the esoteric reading of the Decalogue discussed in the previous essay.
The esoteric reading of the Decalogue reported by Rabbi appears nowhere else. He begins by attributing the source of the reading to Mt. Sinai: “Moses received torah (a teaching) from Sinai.” It is significant that this teaching is distinct from the Torah. Rabbi incorporates the teaching in a composition designed according to the way the esoteric Decalogue is read as five consecutive pairs of Words. He presents ten aphorisms attributed to five consecutive pairs of national leaders who lived during the time of the Second Temple. Like the ten parts of the Decalogue, the ten aphorisms can be read as independent of each other. But when they are read as an integrated composition, they reveal their esoteric content.
The first essay, “The Decalogue is an Esoteric Composition” is taken from my book Before Chapter and Verse. It explains how the author of the Torah (referred to as “M”) associates the source of esoteric/exoteric writing with the deity. M employed the “divine writing” literary device, textual weaving, throughout the Torah. Consequently, what may be the best-known section of the Bible, contains the key for reading the entire Torah as an esoteric/exoteric composition.
קליין, משה, Moshe Kline. “The Literary Structure of the Mishnah (‘Erubin’ Chapter X) / כל חלקי הבית אחוזים זה בזה: משנת עירובין פרק עשירי.” Alei Sefer: Studies in Bibliography and in the History of the Printed and the Digital Hebrew Book / עלי ספר: מחקרים בביבליוגרפיה ובתולדות הספר העברי המודפס והדיגיטלי, no. יד (1987): 5–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24158735.
Conference Presentations by Moshe Kline
https://www.academia.edu/104299841/The_Covenant_Code_A_New_Way_of_Reading_Exodus_22_17_23_19
This presentation delivered at the international SBL in Salzburg in 2022 together with Dr. Paul Hocking. It proposes a creative way of reading the Covenant Code in the book of Exodus. Using synchronic, literary criticism of the second half of the Covenant Code. We propose the laws be read and conceived as five triads, rather than independently. The resulting construct can then be viewed as two-dimensional parallelism, or better, as a literary weave, containing warp and weft “threads” on a literary “loom.” The flow of meaning down the threads of text suggests a process of nation-building. The identification of woven composition in such texts presents new possibilities for understanding the literary context of specific laws. The meaning of any given law is a function of its place in the weave.
This is an overview of a series of essays regarding the transmission of biblical knowledge that was intended for a very limited audience. The specific technique employed to transmit this knowledge may seem counter intuitive. It was embedded in texts that had the broadest popular appeal. While we may envision “secret teachings” being passed by word of mouth, or in rare manuscripts, the authors we will examine had a very different approach. They, evidently, believed that compositions with the broadest possible appeal provided the best chance for the esoteric teachings to survive. So, they employed a literary device that embedded deeper meanings into popular compositions, where they waited to be understood by the few.
Knowledge of the divine-writing device survived at least into the third century CE. Rabbi Judah the Prince, “Rabbi” for short, composed the entire Mishnah according to the device. He embedded testimony regarding its source in what was to be his most popular composition, Pirke Avot, sometimes called “The Ethics of the Fathers.” Our second essay, “The Art of Writing the Oral Tradition” analyzes this testimony. Rabbi’s testimony in Avot is based on the esoteric reading of the Decalogue discussed in the previous essay.
The esoteric reading of the Decalogue reported by Rabbi appears nowhere else. He begins by attributing the source of the reading to Mt. Sinai: “Moses received torah (a teaching) from Sinai.” It is significant that this teaching is distinct from the Torah. Rabbi incorporates the teaching in a composition designed according to the way the esoteric Decalogue is read as five consecutive pairs of Words. He presents ten aphorisms attributed to five consecutive pairs of national leaders who lived during the time of the Second Temple. Like the ten parts of the Decalogue, the ten aphorisms can be read as independent of each other. But when they are read as an integrated composition, they reveal their esoteric content.
The first essay, “The Decalogue is an Esoteric Composition” is taken from my book Before Chapter and Verse. It explains how the author of the Torah (referred to as “M”) associates the source of esoteric/exoteric writing with the deity. M employed the “divine writing” literary device, textual weaving, throughout the Torah. Consequently, what may be the best-known section of the Bible, contains the key for reading the entire Torah as an esoteric/exoteric composition.
קליין, משה, Moshe Kline. “The Literary Structure of the Mishnah (‘Erubin’ Chapter X) / כל חלקי הבית אחוזים זה בזה: משנת עירובין פרק עשירי.” Alei Sefer: Studies in Bibliography and in the History of the Printed and the Digital Hebrew Book / עלי ספר: מחקרים בביבליוגרפיה ובתולדות הספר העברי המודפס והדיגיטלי, no. יד (1987): 5–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24158735.
Can the identification of such divisions lead to deeper understandings? These are among the questions that formed the basis of an extensive research project.
Before Chapter and Verse, the fruit of that research, presents a surprising discovery. To read the Torah as it was written, the text must be arranged in columns and rows, as tables, or more properly, weaves. Each of the eighty-six literary units that comprise the Torah was constructed as a warp and woof, with the stone tablets of the Decalogue providing the prototype. In turn, these units were woven together in the structures that form the five books. The weaving analogy applies to both the micro level of the unit and the macro level of the books.
Before Chapter and Verse provides you with the tools to read the Torah as it was woven. It includes a color-coded English translation of the Torah’s eighty-six units, presented according to their literary structures, as well as maps showing the structure of each book.
Now available in printed format from Amazon https://a.co/d/5hHjKOV
Moshe Kline is an independent researcher, who studies the literary formats of ancient Hebrew texts. His research has led to the discovery of the formal structure of the Torah, as described in this volume, as well as the structure of the Mishnah. He has published findings both in Hebrew and English books and journals. His research was mentored by Jacob Milgrom, Mary Douglas, and Léon Ashkenazi (Manitou).