... Download, http://hdl.handle.net/10072/31187. Herausgeber, Turku Centre for Computer Science, ... more ... Download, http://hdl.handle.net/10072/31187. Herausgeber, Turku Centre for Computer Science, Turku, http://www.spiceconference.com/. Mitarbeiter, Terry Rout, Ivan Porres, Risto Nevalainen, Beatrix Barafort, SPICE Users Group. Archiv, ARROW Discovery Service (Australia). ...
... ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESS ASSESSMENT ... Power Guide requires certified software in... more ... ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESS ASSESSMENT ... Power Guide requires certified software in the highest safety class, hence there is a need to develop a national ... Still, the process assessment is only a complementary method when the final validity of the product is ...
Several real-life qualifications are already done by using TVO SWEP method. The goals of the meth... more Several real-life qualifications are already done by using TVO SWEP method. The goals of the method are achieved well, and the pre-qualification is effective. It is evident that TVO
SAFIR2010. The Finnish Research Programme on Safety 2007-2010. Final Report. Puska, Eija Karita &... more SAFIR2010. The Finnish Research Programme on Safety 2007-2010. Final Report. Puska, Eija Karita & Suolanen, Vesa. VTT Research Notes 2571, 66 - 76 As a part of the Finnish nuclear research program SAFIR2010 a project called CERFAS aimed to define necessary software certification services for nuclear industry needs. Main areas of the service development activities are process assessment and product evaluation. As a part of the Finnish nuclear research program SAFIR2010 a project called CERFAS aimed to define necessary software certification services for nuclear industry needs. Main areas of the service development activities are process assessment and product evaluation.
In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safetycritical software. In this p... more In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safetycritical software. In this paper requirements in three documents (two software standards and the Common Position of nuclear domain regulators) were compared. The aim of the work was to find out how ...
2010 Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, 2010
Abstract In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safety-critical software.... more Abstract In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safety-critical software. As a part of Finnish nuclear research program SAFIR2010 an on-going project called CERFAS aims to define necessary software certification services for nuclear ...
ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall ... more ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall model monster, and is outright contra productive to agile methods. From the CMMI camp you can hear someone to say that agile methods is hackers from hell that uses the agile paradigm to enjoy anarchy with no rules. You can also hear some say that agile works the best in CMMI level 5 companies. The context of the dilemma however is slightly awkward. CMMI describes characteristics of good development practices, and agile is a lifecycle concept. So from a meta point of view they can easily co-exist. We would like to state that they do, and that you need both to support the best development performance. Starting in December 2011 three surveys were launched to get an idea about what could an agile maturity model deliver and what might be its added value. 67 Participants from several agile or/and CMMI® related LinkedIn Groups contributed to the survey. This article explains the survey results and proposes further research topics and harmonization actions.
ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such mod... more ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such models can be found and it contains a structured top level compilation of the currently available agile maturity models. In the second section, the paper describes an approach to analyse these agile maturity models, extracts their content, maps it to a reference model and then synthesizes the real agile maturity issues. The paper also describes the needs for scientific research in this topic. The paper will not present its own Agile Maturity Model. This will be the task for further research. It intends however to compile current agile maturity model thinking linking it to philosophical issues partly also raised in recent initiatives like the SPI Manifesto, the ECQA PI Manager Certification Scheme and SEMAT.
Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 2000
... E-mail: risto.nevalainen@fisma.fi Copyright q 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Page 2. 270 R.... more ... E-mail: risto.nevalainen@fisma.fi Copyright q 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Page 2. 270 R. NEVALAINEN AND T. SCHWEIGERT expectations. One reason behind this is poor understanding of competences, roles and responsi-bilities of PI activities and tasks. ...
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, 2012
ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall ... more ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall model monster, and is outright contra productive to agile methods. From the CMMI camp you can hear someone to say that agile methods is hackers from hell that uses the agile paradigm to enjoy anarchy with no rules. You can also hear some say that agile works the best in CMMI level 5 companies. The context of the dilemma however is slightly awkward. CMMI describes characteristics of good development practices, and agile is a lifecycle concept. So from a meta point of view they can easily co-exist. We would like to state that they do, and that you need both to support the best development performance. Starting in December 2011 three surveys were launched to get an idea about what could an agile maturity model deliver and what might be its added value. 67 Participants from several agile or/and CMMI® related LinkedIn Groups contributed to the survey. This article explains the survey results and proposes further research topics and harmonization actions.
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, 2013
ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such mod... more ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such models can be found and it contains a structured top level compilation of the currently available agile maturity models. In the second section, the paper describes an approach to analyse these agile maturity models, extracts their content, maps it to a reference model and then synthesizes the real agile maturity issues. The paper also describes the needs for scientific research in this topic. The paper will not present its own Agile Maturity Model. This will be the task for further research. It intends however to compile current agile maturity model thinking linking it to philosophical issues partly also raised in recent initiatives like the SPI Manifesto, the ECQA PI Manager Certification Scheme and SEMAT.
... Download, http://hdl.handle.net/10072/31187. Herausgeber, Turku Centre for Computer Science, ... more ... Download, http://hdl.handle.net/10072/31187. Herausgeber, Turku Centre for Computer Science, Turku, http://www.spiceconference.com/. Mitarbeiter, Terry Rout, Ivan Porres, Risto Nevalainen, Beatrix Barafort, SPICE Users Group. Archiv, ARROW Discovery Service (Australia). ...
... ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESS ASSESSMENT ... Power Guide requires certified software in... more ... ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROCESS ASSESSMENT ... Power Guide requires certified software in the highest safety class, hence there is a need to develop a national ... Still, the process assessment is only a complementary method when the final validity of the product is ...
Several real-life qualifications are already done by using TVO SWEP method. The goals of the meth... more Several real-life qualifications are already done by using TVO SWEP method. The goals of the method are achieved well, and the pre-qualification is effective. It is evident that TVO
SAFIR2010. The Finnish Research Programme on Safety 2007-2010. Final Report. Puska, Eija Karita &... more SAFIR2010. The Finnish Research Programme on Safety 2007-2010. Final Report. Puska, Eija Karita & Suolanen, Vesa. VTT Research Notes 2571, 66 - 76 As a part of the Finnish nuclear research program SAFIR2010 a project called CERFAS aimed to define necessary software certification services for nuclear industry needs. Main areas of the service development activities are process assessment and product evaluation. As a part of the Finnish nuclear research program SAFIR2010 a project called CERFAS aimed to define necessary software certification services for nuclear industry needs. Main areas of the service development activities are process assessment and product evaluation.
In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safetycritical software. In this p... more In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safetycritical software. In this paper requirements in three documents (two software standards and the Common Position of nuclear domain regulators) were compared. The aim of the work was to find out how ...
2010 Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, 2010
Abstract In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safety-critical software.... more Abstract In the nuclear domain, regulators have strict requirements for safety-critical software. As a part of Finnish nuclear research program SAFIR2010 an on-going project called CERFAS aims to define necessary software certification services for nuclear ...
ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall ... more ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall model monster, and is outright contra productive to agile methods. From the CMMI camp you can hear someone to say that agile methods is hackers from hell that uses the agile paradigm to enjoy anarchy with no rules. You can also hear some say that agile works the best in CMMI level 5 companies. The context of the dilemma however is slightly awkward. CMMI describes characteristics of good development practices, and agile is a lifecycle concept. So from a meta point of view they can easily co-exist. We would like to state that they do, and that you need both to support the best development performance. Starting in December 2011 three surveys were launched to get an idea about what could an agile maturity model deliver and what might be its added value. 67 Participants from several agile or/and CMMI® related LinkedIn Groups contributed to the survey. This article explains the survey results and proposes further research topics and harmonization actions.
ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such mod... more ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such models can be found and it contains a structured top level compilation of the currently available agile maturity models. In the second section, the paper describes an approach to analyse these agile maturity models, extracts their content, maps it to a reference model and then synthesizes the real agile maturity issues. The paper also describes the needs for scientific research in this topic. The paper will not present its own Agile Maturity Model. This will be the task for further research. It intends however to compile current agile maturity model thinking linking it to philosophical issues partly also raised in recent initiatives like the SPI Manifesto, the ECQA PI Manager Certification Scheme and SEMAT.
Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 2000
... E-mail: risto.nevalainen@fisma.fi Copyright q 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Page 2. 270 R.... more ... E-mail: risto.nevalainen@fisma.fi Copyright q 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Page 2. 270 R. NEVALAINEN AND T. SCHWEIGERT expectations. One reason behind this is poor understanding of competences, roles and responsi-bilities of PI activities and tasks. ...
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, 2012
ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall ... more ABSTRACT From the agile camp you can hear someone to say that CMMI is the big American waterfall model monster, and is outright contra productive to agile methods. From the CMMI camp you can hear someone to say that agile methods is hackers from hell that uses the agile paradigm to enjoy anarchy with no rules. You can also hear some say that agile works the best in CMMI level 5 companies. The context of the dilemma however is slightly awkward. CMMI describes characteristics of good development practices, and agile is a lifecycle concept. So from a meta point of view they can easily co-exist. We would like to state that they do, and that you need both to support the best development performance. Starting in December 2011 three surveys were launched to get an idea about what could an agile maturity model deliver and what might be its added value. 67 Participants from several agile or/and CMMI® related LinkedIn Groups contributed to the survey. This article explains the survey results and proposes further research topics and harmonization actions.
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, 2013
ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such mod... more ABSTRACT The paper describes the current status of agile maturity models. It shows where such models can be found and it contains a structured top level compilation of the currently available agile maturity models. In the second section, the paper describes an approach to analyse these agile maturity models, extracts their content, maps it to a reference model and then synthesizes the real agile maturity issues. The paper also describes the needs for scientific research in this topic. The paper will not present its own Agile Maturity Model. This will be the task for further research. It intends however to compile current agile maturity model thinking linking it to philosophical issues partly also raised in recent initiatives like the SPI Manifesto, the ECQA PI Manager Certification Scheme and SEMAT.
Uploads
Papers by Risto Nevalainen