Suela Musta

One of the dilemmas of transparency between the public and the Parliament is the relation between the parliament, as the most representative political institution of the people and civil society. In parliamentary communication, the relations with NGO-s are a relatively new experience (after the 2000s) and it has approached to the quality of international experiences. The outcome of this relation, more than an informative process, or the transmitting of its problems in the Parliament floor, has mostly followed a „mediatisation strategy‟, as a part of the marketing with the public from both sides. In this scientific cover age it will be in focus the communication between the Parliament and NGOs and analysing the people‟s information dilemmas from one side and the role of parliamentary transparency on the other side, as part of the Public Relations of the institution itself. Media‟s opinion as a key factor in information, it is considered necessary in the evaluation of the communicatio...

Is there a language typology in social media communication policy and serves as message tracking interactive with the public; realistically how this information and news are included in this communication? Hate speeching, discrimination, stereotyping and verbal conflict in compliance with the best online political communication from the necessity to transmit online These assumptions and other questions will be raised in this paper to get answers and to come to conclusions that are necessary and lacking in studies on social media, as an important part of mediatization of politics. Just the phrase "mediatization of politics" in social sites will be the starting point of its theoretical approach will be connected to the ethics and norms of online communication. The paper will be discussed during the monitoring and twitter fb pages and blogs politicians some political news portals. Semantic content will be treated on both sides of communication: the message of the politician, ...