Zoltan Skoda

The late Babylonian astronomical texts (LBAT) are of considerable
astronomical and historical importance.
Virtually all the LBAT were recovered from the site of Babylon in the 1870s
and 1880s and are now mostly in the British Museum.
Most of the LBAT that contain observations can be divided into three distinct categories: astronomical diaries; compilations of reports of a specific type of phenomenon; and so-called ‘goal-year texts’.

Here in my recent study I present in brief all my astronomical results of all my previous books. In addition I also present the determination of the dates for several ancient astronomical events.
I had hoped for a while that someone else, with more extensive training in astronomy, would step forward to complete the task. Since nobody accepted this challenge, you must rest contented with my unprofessional studies. However, I hope you will find this content rewarding! Naturally, there will be those who find my work less than rewarding!
I gratefully acknowledge my debt to major scientists of the past, particularly T. von Oppolzer, F.K. Ginzel, and Robert R. Newton, whose works gave me a professional orientation, and opportunity to educate myself in astronomy, and good guidance regarding solar and lunar eclipses. It is a pity they have passed from us before the creation of the Hungarian Calendar.
The eclipse maps, figures, tables, and predictions appear here by courtesy of Fred Espenak, of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.
I wish all my readers a good read. Please take my analysis as food for thought and hazard a guess for the future consequences.
LCCN: 202 1429 996

Correction of the dominant/mainstream scientific chronology
Extract of the new chronology
Common Era (CE) not equivalent to the Christian Era, or Era
of Jesus Christ, or Era of the Incarnation or Anno Domini
(AD) AD 1 = CE 191!
CE 1 not equivalent to SE 311/312
AH 1 not equivalent CE 622
Seljuk AH 1 = CE 622
CE 632; The first day of Yazdegerd Era (YZ)
AH 1 = Seljuk AH 201 = AD 622 = CE 816!
Spanish Era 1 = CE 155!
THE HUNGARIAN CALENDAR = ASTRONOMICAL DATING

Everyone can continue to examine the dated clay tablets using my „Seleucid code”; the result will be always analogical. The academic standpoint is very straight in connection with the clay tablets:
If the lunar eclipse is definitely mentioned on the tablet, but the retro-calculation cannot show one in the traditional chronology, then they determine the case as „prediction”. In about 50 percent of the examined cases, of course, they find lunar eclipses retro-calculated in the traditional
chronology and they generously accept those as „observations”, suffering greatly of course from the inaccurate measurements committed by the Babylonian astronomers.
Dear Reader, please understand the essence of what I say. Every recorded event was misplaced in time by 196 years; none of the identified solar or lunar eclipses are correct, all of them being forcibly adjusted to the purpose, into a kind of scientific strait-jacket. Today we have this as the
modern science, Assyriology, and the astronomical chronology which proves the previous one using retro-calculation! And from these mistaken basic data, the physicists happily calculate the value of delta-T.
After the publication of my first book, the Hungarian Calendar, there was observable a slight worrying in the circles of Hungarian astronomers, but Keszthelyi, by giving his unruffled critical remarks, calmed their fears. He could not accept my published results as good proofs since the
24 solar eclipses examined in my book did not always differ with the same time-distance from the historical solar eclipses which were declared by me as mistakenly identified ones. (I tried to defend my statements by saying that during the time of the examined solar eclipses humanity had not yet
possessed a universal system of chronology, but this argument was not acceptable to my critic).
However, in this current short study the above mentioned defects in my 2003 book cannot be assigned to me. In a closed chronological system, the Seleucid era, the astronomical events of my proposal can always be found at a distance of 196 years from the forcibly synchronized and mistakenly identified ones.
A roughly 200 years of time-slip in our history has been proved once again, not only by the means of the earlier retro-calculation of the vernal equinoxes, but this time by the means of the „Seleucid code”. The Reader has a right to ask what will happen next. After all, this study can also
be left without any comments (as happened with the Hungarian Calendar), but the main question then would be what good this silence would be for universal science.
LCCN: 201-041-1948

Tal y como lo hice en mis estudios hasta ahora publicados, analice una parte parcial de Hispania (LA CORONA DE ARAGÓN), es decir organicé del tiempo histórico al tiempo astronómico, al sistema ERA COMÚN. Denominé este sistema como “el cómputo de tiempo cristiano de nuevo tipo”.
Mi tarea aquí, también, era poner en fechas correctas los datos que quedaron en los sistemas mal identificados y aclarar las deducciones erróneas que se formaron de los datos erróneos, que enseñan en nuestras escuelas y universidades.
Estos sistemas de cómputo de tiempo son los siguientes; la era española que identificó un error de 192 años (aplicado), el árabe hijri que erróneamente identificó (aplicado) 194 años de error, y el “cómputo de tiempo cristiano de antiguo tipo” que identificó (aplicado) 190 años de error, y se señala con las siglas „d.C.” en este estudio.
Los datos relativos a cada año, no me los he inventado yo, sino he citado los acontecimientos más importantes para mí, con señalar el año/mes/día encontrados en la publicación del ATLAS CRONOLÓGICO DE LA HISTORIA DE ESPAÑA (ISBN 978-84- 675-3162-9) publicado por la Real Academia de la Historia.
Como del mismo dato no siempre podemos establecer que tipo de sistema sigue, es decir, sigue la de la era española o se basa en las fuentes conservadas del sistema árabe hijri, puede darse un error cronológico de unos dos años. Naturalmente pretendí reducir esta posibilidad de error a la mínima.
Este estudio se preparó para profesionales y a estos profesionales les confrontó con el tiempo astronómico relacionado a los acontecimientos investigados por ellos. Les ayudo a ver mas claro con mis anotaciones, dado que no es fácil la situación de un historiador que, por primera vez se encuentra cuestionando toda la obra de su vida.
Hoy en día ya está tan especializada y concentrada la investigación histórica en áreas reducidas que los investigadores, simplemente, no pueden ver a través de unidades mas grandes geográficas y de tiempo. Esta reducción puede nublar la vista del investigador que no puede o no quiere filtrar las falsificaciones porque con ello reduce su
propio ámbito de investigación...

Az elmúlt tizenöt évben olyan mennyiségű új tudás került napvilágra a
történelmi időrend kapcsán, amely elengedhetetlenné tette egy új Hungária történeti időrendje című ismertető megjelentetését. Mivel a megkeresztelkedett Hungária története szorosan kapcsolódott a pápaság
történetéhez, nem hagyhatjuk ki a pápaság újkronológiáját sem.
A kultúrnépek az időmérést és az időszámítást tudománnyá fejlesztették.
Ez a tudomány a kronológia vagy kortan. Az időmérés és az időszámítás
majdnem mindenütt és mindig az égitestek mozgása és változása alapján
történt, ehhez naptárainkban csak a nap és az év fogalma szükségeltetik.
Az időmérésnek azt a módját, amely az égitestek mozgásának a lehetőség szerinti pontos számításán alapszik, a matematikai kronológia tárgyalja; azzal pedig, hogy a különböző népek különböző korokban a maguk módján hogyan mérték és számították az időt, a történelmi kronológia foglalkozik.
Évek óta hangsúlyozom; egy bizonyos, írásban megörökített esemény
csak akkor nyer történelmi jelleget, ha meg tudjuk állapítani, hogy hol és
mikor történt az esemény, különben a legendák, mondák világában a
helye.
A történelemben matematika és csillagászat nélkül teljes lenne a zűrzavar, így a capitoliumi ludak esetleg a szedáni kapituláció mellé kerülnének...

Since 2002 it has been my firm belief of mine a very significant – almost
a 200 year – slip can be detected between the historical and mathematical/astronomical chronology in Antiquity and the Middle Ages in the Mediterranean region and the Near East.
Mathematical chronology is based on the movement of the celestial
bodies, while historical chronology systematizes the remaining sources
on grounds of the data given by different calendar systems.
According to the chronology to which I gave the name Hungarian Calendar, Julius Caesar introduced his famous reform calendar named after him the Julian calendar, in the astronomically count-down year of 152 CE.
Since then, without any intermission, we measure time in years
(365.25 days).
This however shortens the today valid time-axis by 196 years.
The Hungarian Calendar has determined the date of CE 152 as the starting date of the Julian calendar, by simple astronomical calculations.
These calculations essentially count back year by year from the current
year’s vernal equinox (the day in Spring with equal day and night) and
the result of the “new chronology” are then validated by critical analysis
of the historical solar eclipses.
I must point out to doubters of this method of counting back in the
time that modern astronomical research could not operate without it.
A signally important conclusion of the Hungarian Calendar is that the
dates of the vernal equinox (spring point) in the starting year of the Julian
calendar (152 CE) and at time of the “Augustan correction (208 CE) were
both on March 21. The Hungarian Calendar answers the main question:
why was it that Pope Gregory, in 1582, amended the calendar (very correctly, by the way) only by 10 days?
The Hungarian Calendar also hypothesizes that Jesus Christ was born
in 194 CE.
After the publication of my Hungarian Calendar (2002, 2004) and my
solution for the Seleucid Code (2009) I feel my obligation to answer the
questions of the Arabic chronological order which is in frequent use as
a proof against the statement of my Hungarian Calendar.
In 2004 I published my firm statement in connection with the above
important starting date, 1 AH: the year of AD 622 corresponds to the year
of 816 CE (Common Era) which is identified astronomically.
Or to be more specific: the first day of the AH 1 year corresponds to
July 30, 816 CE of Julian calendar!
For my research, I used both artificial intelligence and natural unintelligence to edit the book.

Here in my recent study I present in brief all my astronomical results of all my previous books. In addition I also present the determination of the dates for several ancient astronomical events. I had hoped for a while that someone else, with more extensive training in astronomy,
would step forward to complete the task. Since nobody accepted this challenge, you must rest contented with my unprofessional studies. However, I hope you will find this content rewarding! Naturally, there will be those who find my work less than rewarding!
I gratefully acknowledge my debt to major scientists of the past, particularly T. von Oppolzer, F.K. Ginzel, and Robert R. Newton, whose works gave me a professional orientation, and opportunity to educate myself in astronomy, and good guidance regarding solar and lunar eclipses. It is a pity they have passed from us before the creation of the
Hungarian Calendar.
The eclipse maps, figures, tables, and predictions appear here by courtesy of Fred Espenak, of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.
I wish all my readers a good read. Please take my analysis as food for thought and hazard a guess for the future consequences.