Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Editors' Suggestion

Exploring freeze-out and flow using exact solutions of conformal hydrodynamics

Owen Bradley and Christopher Plumberg
Phys. Rev. C 109, 054913 – Published 28 May 2024

Abstract

Exact solutions to the equations of hydrodynamics provide valuable benchmark tests for numerical hydrodynamic codes and also provide useful insights into the nature of hydrodynamic flow. In this paper, we introduce two novel, closely related exact solutions with nontrivial rapidity dependence which are generalizations of the well-known Gubser flow solution to conformal hydrodynamics. We then use one of our solutions to explore the consequences of choosing between two different criteria for implementing the freeze-out process in fluid dynamical simulations of nuclear collisions: freeze-out at constant temperature vs freeze-out at constant Knudsen number. We find that, employing our exact solution, the differences between these freeze-out criteria are heavily influenced by the presence of strong collective flow. Our results highlight the importance of accurately describing the freeze-out process in collisions with large flow gradients, particularly in small systems.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 16 February 2024
  • Accepted 10 April 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.054913

©2024 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Owen Bradley and Christopher Plumberg*

  • Natural Science Division, Pepperdine University, Malibu, California 90263, USA

  • *christopher.plumberg@pepperdine.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 109, Iss. 5 — May 2024

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The conformal energy density ε̂ [panel (a)] and the flow rapidity ξ [panel (b)] vs the timelike coordinate ρ, for different choices of the free parameter c2. Gubser's original solution (corresponding to c2=0 is given by the thick (solid black) line in both panels. The horizontal dashed black line in the righthand panel shows that ξ*=ξ(ρ*)1.188, independent of c2. See text for discussion.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    The physical energy density ε as a function of τ, for various radius r and rapidity η. Each panel shows a different combination of free parameters t0 and c2: t0=0.1 fm/c and c2=0 [panel (a)]; t0=0.1 fm/c and c2=0.1 [panel (b)]; t0=0.5 fm/c and c2=0 [panel (c)]; t0=0.5 fm/c and c2=0.1 [panel (d)].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    The transverse velocity ur/uτ as a function of η, for various τ and r. Each panel shows a different combination of free parameters t0 and c2: t0=0.1 fm/c and c2=0 [panel (a)]; t0=0.1 fm/c and c2=0.1 [panel (b)]; t0=0.5 fm/c and c2=0 [panel (c)]; t0=0.5 fm/c and c2=0.1 [panel (d)]. See text for discussion.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    The longitudinal velocity τuη/uτ as a function of η, for various τ and r. Each panel shows a different combination of free parameters t0 and c2: t0=0.1 fm/c and c2=0 [panel (a)]; t0=0.1 fm/c and c2=0.1 [panel (b)]; t0=0.5 fm/c and c2=0 [panel (c)]; t0=0.5 fm/c and c2=0.1 (panel (d)). See text for discussion.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Pairs of freeze-out contours using criteria of constant temperature (solid black lines) and constant Knudsen number Kn (dashed black lines), plotted on top of the transverse flow vr=ur/uτ in the τr plane. Both panels take t0=0.5fm/c and either η=0 [panel (a), where uη=0] or η=2 [panel (b)]. The Knudsen number contours correspond to Kn= 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, and 1.25 (ordered by increasing τ at r=0), and the temperature contours have been adjusted to match the Knudsen number contours at r=0. A solid red contour at T=130 MeV is included for reference.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Panel (a) displays thick contours in the (τ,r) plane for Knθ=0.75 (solid blue), 1.00 (dashed purple), and 1.25 (dot-dashed red). For each of these respective contours, we also plot the temperature T [panel ](b)) and radial velocity ur/uτ [panel (c)] as a function of radius r, with the same styling of lines in each panel. For each thick contour representing Knθ, we also plot a thin contour of the same color and line style to represent Knθ̃.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Panel (a) displays contours in the (τ,r) plane for Knθ=0.75 (solid blue), 1.00 (dashed purple), and 1.25 (dot-dashed red). For each of these respective contours, we also plot the temperature T [panel (b)] and radial velocity ur/uτ [panel (c)] as a function of radius r, with the same styling of lines in each panel. Thick contours represent Knθ at η=0, while thin contours represent η=2.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×