Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Dynamical stability of the weakly nonharmonic propeller-shaped planar Brownian rotator

Igor Petrović, Jasmina Jeknić-Dugić, Momir Arsenijević, and Miroljub Dugić
Phys. Rev. E 101, 012105 – Published 3 January 2020

Abstract

Dynamical stability is a prerequisite for control and functioning of desired nanomachines. We utilize the Caldeira-Leggett master equation to investigate dynamical stability of molecular cogwheels modeled as a rigid, propeller-shaped planar rotator. To match certain expected realistic physical situations, we consider a weakly nonharmonic external potential for the rotator. Two methods for investigating stability are used. First, we employ a quantum-mechanical counterpart of the so-called “first passage time” method. Second, we investigate time dependence of the standard deviation of the rotator for both the angle and angular momentum quantum observables. A perturbationlike procedure is introduced and implemented to provide the closed set of differential equations for the moments. Extensive analysis is performed for different combinations of the values of system parameters. The two methods are, in a sense, mutually complementary. Appropriate for the short time behavior, the first passage time exhibits a numerically relevant dependence only on the damping factor as well as on the rotator size. However, the standard deviations for both the angle and angular momentum observables exhibit strong dependence on the parameter values for both short and long time intervals. Contrary to our expectations, the time decrease of the standard deviations is found for certain parameter regimes. In addition, for certain parameter regimes nonmonotonic dependence on the rotator size is observed for the standard deviations and for the damping of the oscillation amplitude. Hence, nonfulfillment of the classical expectation that the size of the rotator can be reduced to the inertia of the rotator. In effect, the task of designing the desired protocols for the proper control of the molecular rotations becomes an optimization problem that requires further technical elaboration.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 7 July 2019
  • Revised 16 October 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.012105

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

General PhysicsCondensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsAtomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

Igor Petrović1,*, Jasmina Jeknić-Dugić1,†, Momir Arsenijević2,‡, and Miroljub Dugić2,§

  • 1University of Niš, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia
  • 2University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Science, Radoja Domanovića 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia

  • *igorpetrovicsb@gmail.com
  • jjeknic@pmf.ni.ac.rs
  • fajnman@gmail.com
  • §mdugic18@sbb.rs

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 1 — January 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The cubic potential for the choice of the parameters: ω=0.1,I=3,b=0.01.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Plot of δφφ̂(t,N)φth. Intersection with the horizontal plane determines the tQFPT for the choice of the parameters: (a) γ=20,kBT=0.001,φ(N)=1.1 and (b) γ=0.11,kBT=100,φ(N)=1.3. Panel (c) presents the numerically obtained dependence of tQFPT(N) for the (a) and (b) plots, the dashed line and the solid line, respectively.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    The parameters values and the meaning of the plots is the same as described in the caption of Fig. 2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Plot of δφφ̂(t,N)φth. Intersection with the horizontal plane determines the tQFPT for the choice of the parameters, γ=0.0099, kBT=0.001 and φ(N)=1.6, for (a) the exact case and (b) the inertial case.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    The parameters values γ=1.1 and kBT=100 are used for the square of the standard deviation for: (a) the angle (the top line for N=1 and the bottom line for N=10, consecutively) and (b) the angular momentum (the top line for N=10 and the bottom line for N=1, consecutively).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    The parameters values γ=1.1 and kBT=0.01 are used for the square of the standard deviation for: (a) the angle and (b) the angular momentum.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    The parameters values γ=1.1 and kBT=0.1 are used for the square of the standard deviation for: (a) the angle and (b) the angular momentum.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    The parameters values γ=0.011 and kBT=100 are used for the square of the standard deviation for: (a) the angle (the top line for N=1 and the bottom line for N=10, consecutively) and (b) the angular momentum (the top line for N=10 and the bottom line for N=1, consecutively).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    The parameters values γ=0.011 and kBT=0.01 are used for the square of the standard deviation for: (a) the angle and (b) the angular momentum.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    The parameters values γ=0.011 and kBT=0.1 are used for the square of the standard deviation for: (a) the angle and (b) the angular momentum.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×