Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Featured in Physics
  • Editors' Suggestion

Mechanics-based model for the cooking-induced deformation of spaghetti

Nathaniel N. Goldberg and Oliver M. O'Reilly
Phys. Rev. E 101, 013001 – Published 2 January 2020
Physics logo See Synopsis: Modeling Spaghetti’s Curls
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

In this article, we propose a minimal model for the cooking-induced deformation of spaghetti and related food products. Our approach has parallels to the use of rod theories for the mechanics of slender bodies undergoing growth and is inspired by a wealth of experimental data from the food science literature. We use our model to investigate the cooking of a single strand of spaghetti confined to a pot and reproduce a curious three-stage deformation sequence that arises in the cooking process.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 9 August 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.013001

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Polymers & Soft MatterInterdisciplinary PhysicsGeneral Physics

Synopsis

Key Image

Modeling Spaghetti’s Curls

Published 2 January 2020

A new model predicts the way a spaghetti rod turns from straight to curly as it cooks.

See more in Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Nathaniel N. Goldberg and Oliver M. O'Reilly*

  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1740, USA

  • *oreilly@berkeley.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 1 — January 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Three stages of the cooking process. The black bar in the upper left corner of each image is 1 cm in length. These images of an experiment have been color corrected for clarity. A video of the experiment is included in the Supplemental Material for this paper [4]. (a) Stage 1: sagging, (b) Stage 2: settling, and (c) Stage 3: curling.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    The effect of hydration on a typical spaghetti strand's cross section.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Images of the deformed rod at each of the three stages of the simulated process: (a) sagging, (b) settling, and (c) curling. The points s=0,s=γ1,s=γ2, and s=L are highlighted. The images in this figure should be compared to the experimental results shown in Fig. 1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Evolution of the height y(L) of the right endpoint of a spaghetti noodle according to the model (solid curve) and experiment (dashed curve). The inset images show typical shapes predicted by the model during each stage of the deformation. Asterisks are used to distinguish the points s=γ1 and s=γ2. A video comparing the experiment to the simulation can be found in the Supplemental Material accompanying this paper [4].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Experimental length strain versus time at 20C as reported by Del Nobile and Massera [27]. A fit based on a logistic curve is superimposed on the data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Left: experimental time-aspect ratio relationship at 20C according to Del Nobile and Massera [27] with a superimposed two-term exponential fit. Right: diameter d as a function of time as calculated from the two-term exponential fit in combination with the logistic curve fit for ΔL in Fig. 5.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Left: mass increase versus time as reported by Del Nobile and Massera [27] with our own square-root fit superimposed. Right: linear density as a function of time as computed from using the square-root fit with m0=0.1702g in combination with Fig. 5 with L0=4.71cm.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×