Hadis ilmi acisindan rivâyet donemi kabul edilen ilk bes asir, hadis ilminin rivâyet ve dirâyetle... more Hadis ilmi acisindan rivâyet donemi kabul edilen ilk bes asir, hadis ilminin rivâyet ve dirâyetle ilgili kurallarinin dogdugu ve olustugu zaman dilimine tekabul etmesi bakimindan en onemli donem sayilir. Bu rivayet doneminin onemli hadis alimlerinden biri de Ibn Hibbân el-Busti'dir (o. 354/965). Ilk ogrenimini, Bust ve cevresinde yaptiktan sonra onemli ilim merkezlerini dolasarak ilim tahsil etti. Bu ilmi seyahatinde Antakya'ya da ugradi ve burada bulunan hadis hocalarindan hadis dinledive eserlerinde rivayet etti. Bu ilmi seyahatinde Antakya'ya da ugradi, buradaki hocalardan hadis ogrendi ve eserlerinde rivayet etti. el-Musnedu's-sahih adli hadis kitabinda sahih hadisleri toplamayi amaclamistir. Hadislerin sihhatini belirleme, ravileri cerh ve ta ‘ dil konularinda uzman bir hadis alimidir. Antakya ikinci Islâm halifesi olan Hz. Omer doneminde Muslumanlarin hakimiyeti altina girmisti. Konumu itibariyle ilim taliplilerinin ugrak merkeziydi. Haleb, Musul, Şam, Harrân, ...
Bu çalışma, şahıs eksenli bir çalışma olup I./VIII asır hadis alimle-rinden ve tâbiîn kuşağının ö... more Bu çalışma, şahıs eksenli bir çalışma olup I./VIII asır hadis alimle-rinden ve tâbiîn kuşağının önemli simalarından İbn Sîrîn'i konu edin-mektedir. Basra'da doğup yine burada vefat eden bu alimi tanımak, ilk asırda burada üretilen hadis ilmiyle ilgili düşünce ve yaklaşımı ortaya koymak bakımından önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, hadis ilmine önemli katkıları olan, birçok usûl kural-larının oluşması ve yerleşmesinde büyük emeği bulunan İbn Sîrîn hadis ilmi yönünden incelenecektir. İbn Sîrîn'in hadis tahsili, bu ilme hizmetle-ri, yaptığı katkıları, hadis anlayışı ve yorumu, hadis öğrenim ve öğretim metodu, cerh ve ta‘dîl yöntemi, diğer ilimlerle ilişkisi gibi konular araştı-rılarak ortaya konulacaktır.
Nâme-i Hümayun-3 "I. Mahmud ve Nadir Şah Mektuplaşmaları", 2014
Osmanlı Sultanı I.Mahmud ve İran Avşar Hanedanı'ndan Nâdir Şah ile bu iki devlet başkanının sadra... more Osmanlı Sultanı I.Mahmud ve İran Avşar Hanedanı'ndan Nâdir Şah ile bu iki devlet başkanının sadrazam ve şeyhülislamları arasında teâtî olunan mektupların orjinalleri ve çözümlemeleri.
Al-Farabi International Journal on Social Sciences, 2020
ABSTRACT
The first five centuries, which are considered as narration periods in terms of hadith s... more ABSTRACT The first five centuries, which are considered as narration periods in terms of hadith science, are considered as the most important period in terms of the time period in which the rules of narration and method of hadith science are born and formed. One of the important hadith scholars of this narration period is Ibn Ḥibbān al-Bustī (d. 54/965). After completing his first education in and around Bust, traveled to important science centers and collected science. During this scientific journey he visited Antioch (Anṭākiya), learned hadith from the hadith teachers here and narrated in his works. In his hadith book called al-Musnad al-ṣaḥīḥ, he aimed to collect ṣaḥīḥ hadiths. He is an expert scholar in determining the authenticity of hadith, and in identifying the ravies of the hadith in jarh and ta‘dīl.Antioch was reigned by muslims during the second Islamic caliph Omar. As of its location, it was a center of attraction for those who were willing to learn science. Its proximity to the centers of science such as Haleb, Mawṣil (Mosul), Damascus, Ḥarrān, Jazeera and Ṭarsūs has made Antioch an attractive city for those who want to learn science. Within the context of hadith history, Antioch is seen as one of the most popular destinations where scholars visit for learning hadith. In this article, Ibn Ḥibbān's journey to Antioch and the scholars from whom he was impressed and learned hadith will be studied and presented. Questions such as who these teachers learned hadith from, whom they met in these centers of science, their status in terms of hadith narrations, and who received hadith from them will be investigated and answered. This study will try to shed light on a period of the history of culture in Antakya as well as the history of the hadith.
Ḥadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes ... more Ḥadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes and having some problematic meanings between supporters of Bishr al-Marīsī and ʿUthmān al-Dārimī. These narrations were mostly accepted denounced (munkar) by Bishr al-Marīsī and his supporters due to having an anthropormophist and corporealist content about God. They rejected divine attributes according to their understanding of God based on incomparability (tanzīh) which provided by Mutazilite approach towards divine attributes even though they conveyed some features of Ahl al-Ra’y. They found contradicted of attributing human features to God based on their tanzīhunderstanding, therefore, they interpreted such this kind of narrations in terms of their approach or rejected at all. At the other hand, a hard Ḥadith scholar Uthman al-Darimi believed that one should accept divine attributes as they are in the Qurʾān and Sunna. According to his belief, he considered the explicit meanings of the narrations without interpretation of divine attributes, and based on his perpective he denied Bishr al-Marīsī (d. 218 /833) and his supporters’ interpretations claiming they would cause divesting God of all attributes (ta’tīl). He argues that these narrations should be taken into considerations based on their explicit meanings. The discussions on these ḥadiths are important due to showing different approaches of scholars from the schools of Ahl al-Raʾy and the ones from Ahl al-Ḥadith towards the ḥadith during the period when the main Ḥadith works were collected. Discussions on the narrations studied in this paper reveal two schools’ understandings of divine issues, their approaches to divine attributes, as well inform us their perspectives of ḥadith in general.
Hadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes ... more Hadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes and having some problematic meanings between supporters of Bişr al-Marīsī and ʿUthmān al-Dārimī. These narrations were mostly accepted denounced (munkar) by Bişr al-Marīsī and his sopporters due to having an anthropormophist and corporealist content about God. They rejected divine attributes according to their understanding of God based on incomparability (tanzīh) which provided by Mutazilite approach towards divine attributes even though they conveyed some features of Ahl al-Ra’y. They found contradicted of attributing human features to God based on their tanzīh understanding, therefore, they interpreted such this kind of narra-tions in terms of their approach or rejected at all. At the other hand, a hard Hadith scholar Uth-man al-Darimi believed that one should accept divine attributes as they are in the Qur’an and Sunna. According to his belief, he considered the explicit meanings of the narrations without interpretation of divine attributes, and based on his perpective he denied Bişr al-Marīsī and his supporters’ interpretations claiming they would cause divesting God of all attributes (ta‘tīl). He argues that these narrations should be taken into considerations based on their explicit mea-nings. The discussions on these hadiths are important due to showing different approaches of scholars from the schools of Ahl al-Ra’y and the ones from Ahl al-Hadith towards the hadith du-ring the period when the main Hadith works were collected. Discussions on the narrations stu-died in this paper reveal two schools’ understandings of divine issues, their approaches to divi-ne attributes, as well inform us their perspectives of hadith in general.
Bişr el-Merîsî taraftarları ile Osman ed-Dârimî arasında burada tartışma konusu yapılan hadisler ... more Bişr el-Merîsî taraftarları ile Osman ed-Dârimî arasında burada tartışma konusu yapılan hadisler haberî sıfatları konu alan ve müşkil nitelikte olan rivayetlerden oluşmaktadır. Bu rivayetleri genelde Bişr el-Merîsî ve taraftarlarının tecsîm ve teşbîh içerdiği iddiasıyla münker kabul ettikleri görülmektedir. Ehl-i re'y özellikleri taşımakla birlikte ilahî sıfatlar konusunda Mu‘tezilî bir an-layışa sahip olduklarından tenzih anlayışları gereği sıfatları reddetmektedirler. Yaratılmışlara ait niteliklerin yaratıcıya nisbet edilmesini tenzîh anlayışlarına aykırı gördüklerinden bu tür müşkil rivayetleri ya kendi anlayışları doğrultusunda te’vil ya da reddettikleri gözlenmektedir. Sert bir ehl-i hadîs âlimi olan Osman ed-Dârimî ise, ayet ve hadislerde bildirilen ilahî sıfatlara iman edilmesi gerektiğini kabul etmektedir. Bu anlayışı sebebiyle bu rivayetlerde bildirilen haberî sıfatlara da te’vil etmeksizin lafzî anlamıyla yaklaşmakta; kendi görüşü doğrultusunda Bişr el-Merîsî ve taraftarlarının yaptığı te’villeri reddetmekte, bu te’villerin ta‘tîle yol açacağını ileri sürmektedir. Bu rivayetlerin lafzî (literal) anlamları doğrultusunda anlaşılması gerektiğini savunmaktadır. Bu hadisler üzerinde yapılan tartışmalar, temel hadis eserlerinin yazıldığı dönemde Ehl-i re'y ve Ehl-i hadîs ekollerine mensup âlimlerin hadislere yaklaşımlarını göstermesi bakımından önem arzetmektedir. Burada vermiş olduğumuz hadisler üzerindeki tartışmalar bu iki ekolün uluhiyet anlayışını, haberî sıfatlara yaklaşımlarını ortaya koyduğu gibi bunların genel anlamda hadis perspektifi hakkında bizlere bilgi vermektedir.
This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and fou... more This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and four Caliphs’. Osman ed-Darimi, who lived in third hijri century objects the people who says; hadiths are not reliable since they weren't written down in the times of Prophet Muham-mad and Rashidun Caliphs. He gives several examples with sample hadith texts from those times and tries to falsify the idea of hadiths weren’t written down in earlier period.
This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and fou... more This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and four Caliphs’. Osman ed-Darimi, who lived in third hijri century objects the people who says; hadiths are not reliable since they weren't written down in the times of Prophet Muham-mad and Rashidun Caliphs. He gives several examples with sample hadith texts from those times and tries to falsify the idea of hadiths weren’t written down in earlier period.
This article discusses that Mihne’s impact of Hadith discipline. Mihne was started by Me’mun who ... more This article discusses that Mihne’s impact of Hadith discipline. Mihne was started by Me’mun who was an Abbasid Caliphate; continued by next caliphates; Caliph Mu’tasım and Caliph Vasik; and ended by Caliph Mutevekkil. It analyzes of the reason of starting to Mihne; its consequences; and impact of hadith discipline. Key Words: Hadith, Mihna, Mu‘tazela, Halk al-Qoran
Hadis ilmi acisindan rivâyet donemi kabul edilen ilk bes asir, hadis ilminin rivâyet ve dirâyetle... more Hadis ilmi acisindan rivâyet donemi kabul edilen ilk bes asir, hadis ilminin rivâyet ve dirâyetle ilgili kurallarinin dogdugu ve olustugu zaman dilimine tekabul etmesi bakimindan en onemli donem sayilir. Bu rivayet doneminin onemli hadis alimlerinden biri de Ibn Hibbân el-Busti'dir (o. 354/965). Ilk ogrenimini, Bust ve cevresinde yaptiktan sonra onemli ilim merkezlerini dolasarak ilim tahsil etti. Bu ilmi seyahatinde Antakya'ya da ugradi ve burada bulunan hadis hocalarindan hadis dinledive eserlerinde rivayet etti. Bu ilmi seyahatinde Antakya'ya da ugradi, buradaki hocalardan hadis ogrendi ve eserlerinde rivayet etti. el-Musnedu's-sahih adli hadis kitabinda sahih hadisleri toplamayi amaclamistir. Hadislerin sihhatini belirleme, ravileri cerh ve ta ‘ dil konularinda uzman bir hadis alimidir. Antakya ikinci Islâm halifesi olan Hz. Omer doneminde Muslumanlarin hakimiyeti altina girmisti. Konumu itibariyle ilim taliplilerinin ugrak merkeziydi. Haleb, Musul, Şam, Harrân, ...
Bu çalışma, şahıs eksenli bir çalışma olup I./VIII asır hadis alimle-rinden ve tâbiîn kuşağının ö... more Bu çalışma, şahıs eksenli bir çalışma olup I./VIII asır hadis alimle-rinden ve tâbiîn kuşağının önemli simalarından İbn Sîrîn'i konu edin-mektedir. Basra'da doğup yine burada vefat eden bu alimi tanımak, ilk asırda burada üretilen hadis ilmiyle ilgili düşünce ve yaklaşımı ortaya koymak bakımından önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, hadis ilmine önemli katkıları olan, birçok usûl kural-larının oluşması ve yerleşmesinde büyük emeği bulunan İbn Sîrîn hadis ilmi yönünden incelenecektir. İbn Sîrîn'in hadis tahsili, bu ilme hizmetle-ri, yaptığı katkıları, hadis anlayışı ve yorumu, hadis öğrenim ve öğretim metodu, cerh ve ta‘dîl yöntemi, diğer ilimlerle ilişkisi gibi konular araştı-rılarak ortaya konulacaktır.
Nâme-i Hümayun-3 "I. Mahmud ve Nadir Şah Mektuplaşmaları", 2014
Osmanlı Sultanı I.Mahmud ve İran Avşar Hanedanı'ndan Nâdir Şah ile bu iki devlet başkanının sadra... more Osmanlı Sultanı I.Mahmud ve İran Avşar Hanedanı'ndan Nâdir Şah ile bu iki devlet başkanının sadrazam ve şeyhülislamları arasında teâtî olunan mektupların orjinalleri ve çözümlemeleri.
Al-Farabi International Journal on Social Sciences, 2020
ABSTRACT
The first five centuries, which are considered as narration periods in terms of hadith s... more ABSTRACT The first five centuries, which are considered as narration periods in terms of hadith science, are considered as the most important period in terms of the time period in which the rules of narration and method of hadith science are born and formed. One of the important hadith scholars of this narration period is Ibn Ḥibbān al-Bustī (d. 54/965). After completing his first education in and around Bust, traveled to important science centers and collected science. During this scientific journey he visited Antioch (Anṭākiya), learned hadith from the hadith teachers here and narrated in his works. In his hadith book called al-Musnad al-ṣaḥīḥ, he aimed to collect ṣaḥīḥ hadiths. He is an expert scholar in determining the authenticity of hadith, and in identifying the ravies of the hadith in jarh and ta‘dīl.Antioch was reigned by muslims during the second Islamic caliph Omar. As of its location, it was a center of attraction for those who were willing to learn science. Its proximity to the centers of science such as Haleb, Mawṣil (Mosul), Damascus, Ḥarrān, Jazeera and Ṭarsūs has made Antioch an attractive city for those who want to learn science. Within the context of hadith history, Antioch is seen as one of the most popular destinations where scholars visit for learning hadith. In this article, Ibn Ḥibbān's journey to Antioch and the scholars from whom he was impressed and learned hadith will be studied and presented. Questions such as who these teachers learned hadith from, whom they met in these centers of science, their status in terms of hadith narrations, and who received hadith from them will be investigated and answered. This study will try to shed light on a period of the history of culture in Antakya as well as the history of the hadith.
Ḥadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes ... more Ḥadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes and having some problematic meanings between supporters of Bishr al-Marīsī and ʿUthmān al-Dārimī. These narrations were mostly accepted denounced (munkar) by Bishr al-Marīsī and his supporters due to having an anthropormophist and corporealist content about God. They rejected divine attributes according to their understanding of God based on incomparability (tanzīh) which provided by Mutazilite approach towards divine attributes even though they conveyed some features of Ahl al-Ra’y. They found contradicted of attributing human features to God based on their tanzīhunderstanding, therefore, they interpreted such this kind of narrations in terms of their approach or rejected at all. At the other hand, a hard Ḥadith scholar Uthman al-Darimi believed that one should accept divine attributes as they are in the Qurʾān and Sunna. According to his belief, he considered the explicit meanings of the narrations without interpretation of divine attributes, and based on his perpective he denied Bishr al-Marīsī (d. 218 /833) and his supporters’ interpretations claiming they would cause divesting God of all attributes (ta’tīl). He argues that these narrations should be taken into considerations based on their explicit meanings. The discussions on these ḥadiths are important due to showing different approaches of scholars from the schools of Ahl al-Raʾy and the ones from Ahl al-Ḥadith towards the ḥadith during the period when the main Ḥadith works were collected. Discussions on the narrations studied in this paper reveal two schools’ understandings of divine issues, their approaches to divine attributes, as well inform us their perspectives of ḥadith in general.
Hadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes ... more Hadiths that have been discussed in this paper consist of narrations regarding divine attributes and having some problematic meanings between supporters of Bişr al-Marīsī and ʿUthmān al-Dārimī. These narrations were mostly accepted denounced (munkar) by Bişr al-Marīsī and his sopporters due to having an anthropormophist and corporealist content about God. They rejected divine attributes according to their understanding of God based on incomparability (tanzīh) which provided by Mutazilite approach towards divine attributes even though they conveyed some features of Ahl al-Ra’y. They found contradicted of attributing human features to God based on their tanzīh understanding, therefore, they interpreted such this kind of narra-tions in terms of their approach or rejected at all. At the other hand, a hard Hadith scholar Uth-man al-Darimi believed that one should accept divine attributes as they are in the Qur’an and Sunna. According to his belief, he considered the explicit meanings of the narrations without interpretation of divine attributes, and based on his perpective he denied Bişr al-Marīsī and his supporters’ interpretations claiming they would cause divesting God of all attributes (ta‘tīl). He argues that these narrations should be taken into considerations based on their explicit mea-nings. The discussions on these hadiths are important due to showing different approaches of scholars from the schools of Ahl al-Ra’y and the ones from Ahl al-Hadith towards the hadith du-ring the period when the main Hadith works were collected. Discussions on the narrations stu-died in this paper reveal two schools’ understandings of divine issues, their approaches to divi-ne attributes, as well inform us their perspectives of hadith in general.
Bişr el-Merîsî taraftarları ile Osman ed-Dârimî arasında burada tartışma konusu yapılan hadisler ... more Bişr el-Merîsî taraftarları ile Osman ed-Dârimî arasında burada tartışma konusu yapılan hadisler haberî sıfatları konu alan ve müşkil nitelikte olan rivayetlerden oluşmaktadır. Bu rivayetleri genelde Bişr el-Merîsî ve taraftarlarının tecsîm ve teşbîh içerdiği iddiasıyla münker kabul ettikleri görülmektedir. Ehl-i re'y özellikleri taşımakla birlikte ilahî sıfatlar konusunda Mu‘tezilî bir an-layışa sahip olduklarından tenzih anlayışları gereği sıfatları reddetmektedirler. Yaratılmışlara ait niteliklerin yaratıcıya nisbet edilmesini tenzîh anlayışlarına aykırı gördüklerinden bu tür müşkil rivayetleri ya kendi anlayışları doğrultusunda te’vil ya da reddettikleri gözlenmektedir. Sert bir ehl-i hadîs âlimi olan Osman ed-Dârimî ise, ayet ve hadislerde bildirilen ilahî sıfatlara iman edilmesi gerektiğini kabul etmektedir. Bu anlayışı sebebiyle bu rivayetlerde bildirilen haberî sıfatlara da te’vil etmeksizin lafzî anlamıyla yaklaşmakta; kendi görüşü doğrultusunda Bişr el-Merîsî ve taraftarlarının yaptığı te’villeri reddetmekte, bu te’villerin ta‘tîle yol açacağını ileri sürmektedir. Bu rivayetlerin lafzî (literal) anlamları doğrultusunda anlaşılması gerektiğini savunmaktadır. Bu hadisler üzerinde yapılan tartışmalar, temel hadis eserlerinin yazıldığı dönemde Ehl-i re'y ve Ehl-i hadîs ekollerine mensup âlimlerin hadislere yaklaşımlarını göstermesi bakımından önem arzetmektedir. Burada vermiş olduğumuz hadisler üzerindeki tartışmalar bu iki ekolün uluhiyet anlayışını, haberî sıfatlara yaklaşımlarını ortaya koyduğu gibi bunların genel anlamda hadis perspektifi hakkında bizlere bilgi vermektedir.
This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and fou... more This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and four Caliphs’. Osman ed-Darimi, who lived in third hijri century objects the people who says; hadiths are not reliable since they weren't written down in the times of Prophet Muham-mad and Rashidun Caliphs. He gives several examples with sample hadith texts from those times and tries to falsify the idea of hadiths weren’t written down in earlier period.
This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and fou... more This article analyzes the evidences of hadith writing the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and four Caliphs’. Osman ed-Darimi, who lived in third hijri century objects the people who says; hadiths are not reliable since they weren't written down in the times of Prophet Muham-mad and Rashidun Caliphs. He gives several examples with sample hadith texts from those times and tries to falsify the idea of hadiths weren’t written down in earlier period.
This article discusses that Mihne’s impact of Hadith discipline. Mihne was started by Me’mun who ... more This article discusses that Mihne’s impact of Hadith discipline. Mihne was started by Me’mun who was an Abbasid Caliphate; continued by next caliphates; Caliph Mu’tasım and Caliph Vasik; and ended by Caliph Mutevekkil. It analyzes of the reason of starting to Mihne; its consequences; and impact of hadith discipline. Key Words: Hadith, Mihna, Mu‘tazela, Halk al-Qoran
Uploads
Papers by Doç. Dr. A L I Kaya
Bu çalışmada, hadis ilmine önemli katkıları olan, birçok usûl kural-larının oluşması ve yerleşmesinde büyük emeği bulunan İbn Sîrîn hadis ilmi yönünden incelenecektir. İbn Sîrîn'in hadis tahsili, bu ilme hizmetle-ri, yaptığı katkıları, hadis anlayışı ve yorumu, hadis öğrenim ve öğretim metodu, cerh ve ta‘dîl yöntemi, diğer ilimlerle ilişkisi gibi konular araştı-rılarak ortaya konulacaktır.
The first five centuries, which are considered as narration periods in terms of hadith science, are considered as the most important period in terms of the time period in which the rules of narration and method of hadith science are born and formed. One of the important hadith scholars of this narration period is Ibn Ḥibbān al-Bustī (d. 54/965). After completing his first education in and around Bust, traveled to important science centers and collected science. During this scientific journey he visited Antioch (Anṭākiya), learned hadith from the hadith teachers here and narrated in his works. In his hadith book called al-Musnad al-ṣaḥīḥ, he aimed to collect ṣaḥīḥ hadiths. He is an expert scholar in determining the authenticity of hadith, and in identifying the ravies of the hadith in jarh and ta‘dīl.Antioch was reigned by muslims during the second Islamic caliph Omar. As of its location, it was a center of attraction for those who were willing to learn science. Its proximity to the centers of science such as Haleb, Mawṣil (Mosul), Damascus, Ḥarrān, Jazeera and Ṭarsūs has made Antioch an attractive city for those who want to learn science. Within the context of hadith history, Antioch is seen as one
of the most popular destinations where scholars visit for learning hadith. In this article, Ibn Ḥibbān's journey to Antioch and the scholars from whom he was impressed and learned hadith will be studied and presented. Questions such as who these teachers learned hadith from, whom they met in these centers of science, their status in terms of hadith narrations, and who received hadith from them will be investigated and answered. This study will try to shed light on a period of the history of culture in
Antakya as well as the history of the hadith.
Key Words: Hadith, Mihna, Mu‘tazela, Halk al-Qoran
Bu çalışmada, hadis ilmine önemli katkıları olan, birçok usûl kural-larının oluşması ve yerleşmesinde büyük emeği bulunan İbn Sîrîn hadis ilmi yönünden incelenecektir. İbn Sîrîn'in hadis tahsili, bu ilme hizmetle-ri, yaptığı katkıları, hadis anlayışı ve yorumu, hadis öğrenim ve öğretim metodu, cerh ve ta‘dîl yöntemi, diğer ilimlerle ilişkisi gibi konular araştı-rılarak ortaya konulacaktır.
The first five centuries, which are considered as narration periods in terms of hadith science, are considered as the most important period in terms of the time period in which the rules of narration and method of hadith science are born and formed. One of the important hadith scholars of this narration period is Ibn Ḥibbān al-Bustī (d. 54/965). After completing his first education in and around Bust, traveled to important science centers and collected science. During this scientific journey he visited Antioch (Anṭākiya), learned hadith from the hadith teachers here and narrated in his works. In his hadith book called al-Musnad al-ṣaḥīḥ, he aimed to collect ṣaḥīḥ hadiths. He is an expert scholar in determining the authenticity of hadith, and in identifying the ravies of the hadith in jarh and ta‘dīl.Antioch was reigned by muslims during the second Islamic caliph Omar. As of its location, it was a center of attraction for those who were willing to learn science. Its proximity to the centers of science such as Haleb, Mawṣil (Mosul), Damascus, Ḥarrān, Jazeera and Ṭarsūs has made Antioch an attractive city for those who want to learn science. Within the context of hadith history, Antioch is seen as one
of the most popular destinations where scholars visit for learning hadith. In this article, Ibn Ḥibbān's journey to Antioch and the scholars from whom he was impressed and learned hadith will be studied and presented. Questions such as who these teachers learned hadith from, whom they met in these centers of science, their status in terms of hadith narrations, and who received hadith from them will be investigated and answered. This study will try to shed light on a period of the history of culture in
Antakya as well as the history of the hadith.
Key Words: Hadith, Mihna, Mu‘tazela, Halk al-Qoran