Abstract
Three decades of inquiry have explored the nature of the relationship between writing and reading, yielding at least three theoretical models (interactive, socio-cognitive, and separate processing), numerous perspectives within each model, and a wide range of research methodologies to support or refute these theories. Texts in general and written texts in particular, must have content (i.e., the information depicted in the text) and structure (i.e., the way this information is organized), both constructs are interrelated and essential in the construction of a good expository text. For example, reading research has shown that awareness of text structure contributes to reading fluency, and assists the construction of a coherent mental representation of the text structure improving (Williams JP, Journal of Special Education 39:6–18, 2005) or hampering (Williams, Literacy in the curriculum: integrating text structure and content area instruction. In: McNamara DS (ed) Reading comprehension strategies theories, interventions, and technologies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hoboken, pp 199–220, 2007) comprehension. Drawing on different aspects of each of these theories, this study explores the relations between reading and writing abilities in elementary school children, in middle class integrative schools in central Israel. Our assumption that a high-quality written text contains the various structural components in accordance with the genre requirements was corroborated. We conclude that the indicators that relate to text-structure-quality of different text genres is dynamic and its development is age-dependent.
Let us pick up our books and our pens. They are our most powerful weapons. One child, one teacher, one book, and one pen can change the world.
Malala Yousafzai, the United Nations, 12.6.2013.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 478–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104.
Ahmed, Y., Wagner, R. K., & Lopez, D. (2014). Developmental relations between reading and writing at the word, sentence, and text levels: A latent change score analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035692.
Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7241.2005.00376.x.
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22(1), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/747972.
Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.244.
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500104.
Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951.
Boscolo, P. (2008). Writing in primary school. In C. Bazerman (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 293–309). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boscolo, P., & Ascorti, K. (2004). Effects of collaborative revision on children’s ability to write understandable narrative texts. In G. Rijlaarsdam, L. Allal, L. Chanquoy, & P. Largy (Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol. 13. Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes (pp. 57–172). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
Boscolo, P., Ariasi, N., Del Favero, L., & Ballarin, C. (2011). Interest in an expository text: How does it flow from reading to writing? Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.009.
Breznitz, Z. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
Christie, F. (2005). Language education in the primary school. Sydney: UNSW Press.
Coté, N., Goldman, S. R., & Saul, E. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545019.
Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1.
Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.65.
Ferretti, R. P., Lewis, W. E., & Andrews-Weckerly, S. (2009). Do goals affect the structure of students’ argumentative writing strategies? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 577–589.
Fitzgerald, J. (1990). Reading and writing as “mind meeting”. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Reading and writing together: New perspectives for the classroom (pp. 81–97). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1984). Images, plans, and prose: The representation of meaning in writing. Written Communication, 1(1), 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088384001001006.
Garner, R., & Gillingham, M. G. (1987). Students’ knowledge of text structure. Journal ofReading Behavior, 19(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968709547603.
Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2012). Are attitudes toward writing and reading separable constructs? A study with primary grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2012.632732.
Hall, K. M., Sabey, B. L., & McClellan, M. (2005). Expository text comprehension: Helping primary-grade teachers use expository texts to full advantage. Reading Psychology, 26(3), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710590962550.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hebert, M., Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2013). Comparing effects of different writing activities on reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9386-3.
Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85–97.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1270–1328). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1598/0872075028.46.
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310.
Kress, G. (1994). Learning to write (2nd ed., First published 1982). London: Routledge.
Landi, N. (2010). An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9180-z.
Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. NCTE Research Report No. 22. National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL.
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford Press.
Mäkı, H. S., Voeten, M. J. M., Vauras, M. M. S., & Poskıparta, E. H. (2001). Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing, 14(7–8), 643–672.
McCardle, P., Scarborough, H. S., & Catts, H. W. (2001). Predicting, explaining, and preventing children’s reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/0938-8982.00023.
McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_3.
Meyer, B. J., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of the top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 72–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/747349.
Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (2011). Learning to read changes children’s phonological skills: Evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study of reading and non-word repetition. Developmental Science, 14(4), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01008.x.
Nystrand, M. (2006). Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(4), 392–412.
Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 849–885). San Diego: Academic.
Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York: Guilford Press.
Puranik, C. S., Lonigan, C. J., & Kim, Y. S. (2011). Contributions of emergent literacy skills to name writing, letter writing, and spelling in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.03.002.
Ravid, D., & Tolchinsky, L. (2002). Developing linguistic literacy: A comprehensive model. Journal of Child Language, 29(02), 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005111.
Rosado, E., Salas, N., Aparici, M., & Tolchinsky, L. (2014). Production and judgment of linguistic devices for attaining a detached stance in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.004.
Rubin, D. (1984). Social cognition and written communication. Written Communication, 1(2), 211–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088384001002003.
Savage, R., & Frederickson, N. (2005). Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed. Brain and Language, 93(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.09.005.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1986). Research on written composition. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 778–803). New York: MacMillan.
Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 171–186). New York: Guilford Press.
Shanahan, T. (2015). Relationships between reading and writing development. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 194–210). New York: Guilford Press.
Shany, M., Bahat, A., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., & Zeiger, T. (2005). “Aleph-Taph”: An assessment system for reading and writing disabilities. Tel Aviv: Yesod.
Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584.
Spivey, N. N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/358470.
Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s writing: A function of working memory or reading or both processes? Reading and Writing, 8(4), 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395114.
Taylor, B. M. (1982). Text structure and children’s comprehension and memory for expository material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.3.323.
Tolchinsky, L. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach (Vol. 14). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vernon, S., & Ferreiro, E. (1999). Writing development: A neglected variable in the consideration of phonological awareness. Harvard Educational Review, 69(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.69.4.p411667586738x0w.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73.
Weaver, C. A., & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 230–245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Williams, J. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010201.
Williams, J. P. (2007). Literacy in the curriculum: integrating text structure and content area instruction. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 199–220). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (2000). The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.668.
Wing Jan, L. (2009). Write ways: Modelling writing forms (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Yochum, N. (1991). Children’s learning from informational text: The relationship between prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Literacy Research, 23(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969109547728.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stavans, A., Seroussi, B., Rigbi, A., Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, S. (2020). The Contribution of Reading Abilities to the Writing Quality of Expository Text Structure in Hebrew Speaking Elementary School Children. In: Alves, R.A., Limpo, T., Joshi, R.M. (eds) Reading-Writing Connections. Literacy Studies, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38811-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38810-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38811-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)