Abstract
An emerging trend in classrooms is the use of collaborative learning environments that promote lively exchanges between learners in order to facilitate learning. This paper explored the possibility of using discourse features to predict student and group performance during collaborative learning interactions. We investigated the linguistic patterns of group chats, within an online collaborative learning exercise, on five discourse dimensions using an automated linguistic facility, Coh-Metrix. The results indicated that students who engaged in deeper cohesive integration and generated more complicated syntactic structures performed significantly better. The overall group level results indicated collaborative groups who engaged in deeper cohesive and expository style interactions performed significantly better on posttests. Although students do not directly express knowledge construction and cognitive processes, our results indicate that these states can be monitored by analyzing language and discourse. Implications are discussed regarding computer supported collaborative learning and ITS’s to facilitate productive communication in collaborative learning environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Graesser, A.C., Foltz, P., Rosen, Y., Forsyth, C., Germany, M.: Challenges of Assessing Collaborative Problem-Solving. In: Csapo, B., Funke, J., Schleicher, A. (eds.) The Nature of Problem Solving. OECD Series (in press)
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., Van Keer, H.: Content Analysis Schemes to Analyze Transcripts of Online Asynchronous Discussion Groups: A Review. Comput Educ. 46, 6–28 (2006)
Lou, Y., Abrami, P.C., d’ Apollonia, S.: Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 71, 449–521 (2001)
Gress, C.L.Z., Fior, M., Hadwin, A.F., Winne, P.H.: Measurement and Assessment in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 806–814 (2010)
Rosé, C., Wang, Y.-C., Cui, Y., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: Analyzing Collaborative Learning Processes Automatically: Exploiting the Advances of Computational Linguistics in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 3, 237–271 (2008)
King, A.: Scripting Collaborative Learning Processes: A Cognitive Perspective. In: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., Haake, J.M. (eds.) Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 13–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S.: Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension. Top. Cogn. Sci. 3, 371–398 (2011)
Kirschner, P.A., Ayres, P., Chandler, P.: Contemporary Cognitive Load Theory Research: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 99–105 (2011)
Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H.J.A., Mulder, M., Chizari, M.: Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A synthesis of 15 years of research. Educ. Res. Rev. 7, 79–106 (2012)
Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., Traum, D.: The Role Of Grounding In Collaborative Learning Tasks. In: Dillenbourg, P. (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 31–36. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (1999)
Fiore, S., Schooler, J.: Process Mapping and Shared Cognition: Teamwork and the Development of Shared Problem Models. In: Salas, E., Fiore, S. (eds.) Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance, pp. 133–152. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C (2004)
Fiore, S.M., Rosen, M.A., Smith-Jentsch, K.A., Salas, E., Letsky, M., Warner, N.: Toward an Understanding of Macrocognition in Teams: Predicting Processes in Complex Collaborative Contexts. Hum. Factors. 52, 203–224 (2010)
Dillenbourg, P., Traum, D.: Sharing Solutions: Persistence and Grounding in Multimodal Collaborative Problem Solving. J. Learn. Sci. 15, 121–151 (2006)
Hou, H.-T., Wu, S.-Y.: Analyzing the Social Knowledge Construction Behavioral Patterns of an Online Synchronous Collaborative Discussion Instructional Activity Using an Instant Messaging Tool: A Case Study. Comput. Educ. 57, 1459–1468 (2011)
Yoo, J., Kim, J.: Can Online Discussion Participation Predict Group Project Performance? Investigating the Roles of Linguistic Features and Participation Patterns. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 1–25 (2014)
Murray, T., Woolf, B.P., Xu, X., Shipe, S., Howard, S., Wing, L.: Supporting Social Deliberative Skills in Online Classroom Dialogues: Preliminary Results Using Automated Text Analysis. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 666–668. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Webb, N.M.: Peer Interaction and Learning in Small Groups. Int. J. Educ. Res. 13, 21–39 (1989)
Van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., Simons, P.R.J.: The Affordance of Anchored Discussion for the Collaborative Processing of Academic Texts. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 1, 339–357 (2006)
Scholand, A.J., Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: Assessing Group Interaction with Social Language Network Analysis. In: Chai, S.-K., Salerno, J.J., Mabry, P.L. (eds.) SBP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6007, pp. 248–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
D’Mello, S., Dowell, N., Graesser, A.C.: Cohesion Relationships in Tutorial Dialogue as Predictors of Affective States. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Graesser, A. (eds.) AIED 2009, pp. 9–16. IOS Press, Amsterstam (2009)
Mairesse, F., Walker, M.A.: Towards Personality-Based User Adaptation: Psychologically Informed Stylistic Language Generation. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 20, 227–278 (2010)
Newman, M.L., Pennebaker, J.W., Berry, D.S., Richards, J.M.: Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29, 665–675 (2003)
Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29, 24–54 (2010)
Hancock, J.T., Woodworth, M.T., Porter, S.: Hungry Like the Wolf: A Word-Pattern Analysis of the Language of Psychopaths. Leg. Criminol. Psychol. 18, 102–114 (2013)
Kintsch, W.: Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Snow, C.E.: Reading for Understanding: Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (2002)
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Louwerse, M.M., Cai, Z.: Coh-Metrix: Analysis of Text on Cohesion and Language. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. J. Psychon. Soc. Inc. 36, 193–202 (2004)
McNamara, D.S., Graesser, A.C., McCarthy, P.M., Cai, Z.: Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., Kulikowich, J.M.: Coh-Metrix: Providing Multilevel Analyses of Text Characteristics. Educ. Res. 40, 223–234 (2011)
McNamara, D.S., Crossley, S.A., McCarthy, P.M.: Linguistic Features of Writing Quality. Writ. Commun. 27, 57–86 (2010)
Pinheiro, J.C., Bates, D.M.: Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S.: lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (2013)
Clark, H.H., Brennan, S.E.: Grounding in Communication. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., Teasley, S.D. (eds.) Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127–149. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1991)
Pickering, M.J., Garrod, S.: Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 169–190; discussion 190–226 (2004)
Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., Mandl, H.: Fostering Collaborative Knowledge Construction with Visualization Tools. Learn. Instr. 12, 213–232 (2002)
Stahl, G.: From Individual Representations to Group Cognition. In: Stahl, G. (ed.) Studying Virtual Math Teams, pp. 57–73. Springer, US (2009)
Diziol, D., Walker, E., Rummel, N., Koedinger, K.R.: Using Intelligent Tutor Technology to Implement Adaptive Support for Student Collaboration. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22, 89–102 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dowell, N.M., Cade, W.L., Tausczik, Y., Pennebaker, J., Graesser, A.C. (2014). What Works: Creating Adaptive and Intelligent Systems for Collaborative Learning Support. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)