Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Reforming Junior Cycle: Lessons from Project Maths

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Curriculum Change within Policy and Practice

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is on mathematics education and, in particular, a curriculum initiative, “Project Maths”, that predated the current round of junior cycle reform in Ireland. Project Maths was a major reform of post-primary mathematics education in Ireland and involved changes to what students learnt in mathematics, how they learnt it and how they were assessed. The changes were introduced to all schools nationally in Autumn 2010. However, their introduction on a phased basis meant that it was June 2017 before a substantial cohort of students had experienced all five strands of Project Maths throughout their second-level education. The new junior cycle mathematics specification was introduced for all first-year students in Autumn 2018. The close proximity between the reforms caused some stress for mathematics teachers. This chapter outlines the main similarities and differences between the reforms and investigates what lessons from the recent experiences of Project Maths might usefully inform ongoing implementation of the junior cycle reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Byrne, C. (2016). Globalisation: The allegory that is influencing teachers’ resistance to junior cycle reform. In B. Mooney (Ed.), Education matters yearbook 2016–2017 (pp. 225–231). Dublin, Ireland: Education Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, C., & Prendergast, M. (2019). Investigating the concerns of secondary school teachers towards curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1643924.

  • Conway, P., & Sloane, F. (2006). International trends in post-primary mathematics education: Perspectives on learning, teaching and assessment. Dublin, Ireland: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, J., Perkins, R., Shiel, G., Fish, R., & McGuinness, L. (2012). Teaching and learning in project Maths: Insights from teachers who participated in PISA 2012. Dublin, Ireland: Educational Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (n.d. [1974]). Rules and programme for secondary schools 1974/75. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education (n.d. [1989]). Rules and programme for secondary schools 1987/88 to 1989/90. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science. (2000). Junior certificate mathematics syllabus (higher, ordinary and foundation level). Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science (2013). Junior Certificate Mathematics syllabus: Higher, Ordinary & Foundation level.. Retrieved from https://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/4f6cba68-ac41-485c-85a0-32ae6c3559a7/JCSEC18_Maths_Examination-in-2016.pdf.

  • Department of Education and Science. (2015). Framework for junior cycle 2015. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science/National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2002). Junior certificate mathematics: Guidelines for teachers. Dublin, Ireland: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. L. (2004). The challenges of educational change. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, T. A., & Owens, D. T. (2001). The “new new math”?: Two reform movements in mathematics education. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howson, G., Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1981). Curriculum development in mathematics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Irish Mathematics Teachers Association. (2012). Project Maths and the Irish Maths teachers association. Cork, Ireland: IMTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffes, J., Jones, E., Wilson, M., Lamont, E., Straw, S., Wheater, R., & Dawson, A. (2013). Research into the impact of project Maths on student achievement, learning and motivation. Slough, England: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kärkkäinen, K. (2012). Bringing about curriculum innovations. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 82. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, L., & Hall, K. (2016). The mathematics problem: The construction of a market-led education discourse in the Republic of Ireland. Critical Studies in Education, 57(3), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1102752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubienski, S. T. (2011). Mathematics education and reform in Ireland: An outsider’s analysis of project Maths. Bulletin of the Irish Mathematical Society, 67, 27–55. Retrieved from http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/ims/bull67/2011-1-10.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murchan, D. (2018). Introducing school-based assessment as part of junior cycle reform in Ireland: a bridge too far? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30(2), 97–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2005). Review of mathematics in post-primary education. Dublin, Ireland: NCCA. Retrieved from https://www.ncca.ie/media/3153/project-maths-research_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2017). Junior cycle mathematics. Dublin, Ireland: NCCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2018). Junior cycle mathematics: Guidelines for the classroom-based assessments and assessment task. Dublin, Ireland: NCCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, N., & Prendergast, M. (2018). Time allocated to mathematics in post-primary schools in Ireland: Are we in double trouble? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(4), 501–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, E. E. (1980). Post-primary mathematics in Ireland: An analysis of patterns in curriculum change. In Mathematics, science and the gifted child: Conference proceedings and occasional papers (pp. 49–59). Dublin, Ireland: Department of Higher Education and Research on behalf of the School of Education, Trinity College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, E. E. (1992). Junior cycle mathematics curricula in the Republic of Ireland 1960–1990: Genesis, exodus and numbers. Irish Educational Studies, 11, 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, E. (2007). A lot done, more to do? Changes in mathematics curriculum and assessment 1986–2006. In D. Corcoran & S. Breen (Eds.), Second international science and mathematics conference, Drumcondra, Dublin, September 2006 (pp. 161–174). Dublin, Ireland: Dublin City University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, E. (2019). “Modern Maths” and “project Maths”: Polar opposites or mirror images? In L. Harbison & A. Twohill (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh conference on research in mathematics education in Ireland (MEI7) (pp. 211–218). Dublin, Ireland: Dublin City University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orafi, S. M. S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1961). New thinking in school mathematics. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, M., & Treacy, P. (2018). Curriculum reform in Irish secondary schools? A focus on algebra. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(1), 126–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M., Robinson, S., & Biesta, G. (2012). Teacher agency, performativity and curriculum change: Reinventing the teacher in the Scottish curriculum for excellence? In B. Jeffrey & G. Troman (Eds.), Performativity in UK education: Ethnographic cases of its effects, agency and reconstructions (pp. 87–108). Washington, DC: E&E Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheker-Mendoza, A. (2011). Educational reform and teachers’ decision making: Relationship between the intended and the implemented reading curriculum in Dominican primary schools (doctoral dissertation). State University of New York at Albany, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2014). Reflections on curricular change. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 49–72). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shiel, G., & Kelleher, C. (2017). An evaluation of the impact of project Maths on the performance of students in junior cycle mathematics. Dublin, Ireland: ERC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, A. L. E. (2007). A history of mathematics education during the twentieth century. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, C. (2019). An investigation into the perceptions of mathematics teachers towards the recent changes to the junior cycle mathematics curriculum in Ireland. Unpublished thesis (PME), Trinity College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Byrne .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Byrne, C., Prendergast, M., Oldham, E. (2021). Reforming Junior Cycle: Lessons from Project Maths. In: Murchan, D., Johnston, K. (eds) Curriculum Change within Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50707-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50707-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50706-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50707-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics