Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Docu

Joined 30 December 2012
Revision as of 18:53, 7 September 2021 by MisterSynergy (talk | contribs) (Reverted edits by 182.0.231.183 (talk) to last revision by Lymantria)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Lymantria in topic D2-bot and Docu w. script

Welcome to my talk page

  • If you want me to comment on a specific item/property/discussion, please use its talk page.
  • Talk is archived to the page's history
  • If I left a message on your talk page, please respond there.

.


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Docu
block logipblocklistcrossblockluxo'sunblockremove gblock • contribs: +/-

Request reason:
Block by involved administrator after asking him for an explanation of his thread closure. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Docu (talk • contribs).
Decline reason:
Rschen7754 was only involved in an administrative capacity in this particular incident. I am also uninvolved in this fashion with respect to this particular incident. Your behavior over the past few months is highly deplorable, and you were given numerous warnings that such behavior is not condoned on Wikidata. Specifically, it is already not very good to post at WD:PC for something that really belongs at WD:AN, and when others refuse your request, the next thing to do is not to pick a fight with them (accusations without evidence, immediately chasing down another admin action, just because you weren't happy that your item was deleted), nor taunting the uninvolved thread closer (who is now the blocking admin) with an irrelevant question, that, quite frankly, as an English Wikipedia admin, you should've been able to answer yourself.
I also request that any new unblock request address your behavior, not the behavior of others - you should, as an English Wikipedia admin, know very well about en:WP:NOTTHEM. Your next request will have to assure an admin that you will never repeat this in the foreseeable future. If you abuse your ability to edit this talk page by posting more accusations against others rather than addressing your own behavior, don't be surprised if I or another admin revokes your talk page access, or even extends your block. I do not think you have an idea of the thinness of the ice you are standing on, because this block demonstrates you've learned nothing since the other block. I would not be surprised if your next block is indefinite.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply



Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Docu
block logipblocklistcrossblockluxo'sunblockremove gblock • contribs: +/-

Request reason:
previous unblock request declined by an administrator that was also involved in the discussion. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Docu (talk • contribs).
Decline reason:

Irrelevant.

Given Jasper Deng's request that you focus on your own behavior, and your apparent choice not to do so, I have accordingly restricted talk page access for the remaining duration of the block. Please take the week to consider your behavior. --Izno (talk) 00:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply


Note that neither Izno nor I was involved in your actual dispute except in an administrative capacity, and therefore, we were able to review your unblock request.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:55, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013

edit
 
You have been blocked for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once this block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest it by editing this page and adding the following template with a suitable reason: {{unblock|1=<the reason for your unblock request>}}. If you are logged in, and the option has not been disabled, you may also email the blocking administrator (or any administrator from this list) by using this form. See Wikidata:Guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Rschen7754 23:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Docu, I have blocked you for 1 week for repeated wikilawyering, and refusal to drop the stick, as seen [1] and [2]. Your attempts to second-guess all admin deletions [3] and your repeated assumptions of bad faith without evidence [4][5][6] are completely beyond the pale, and disruptive to a normal collaborative environment.

Quite frankly, I would have made this an indefinite block, and I think that the next block will be indefinite, but the week's time is for you to reconsider the way that you edit here, and whether you want to be part of a community that does not tolerate such poor behavior. I realize that you are an admin on the English Wikipedia, but that does not give you any form of immunity, or any right to behave this poorly on other Wikimedia sites, and reflects badly on the English Wikipedia (my home wiki, and where I still remain an admin). Please, prove me wrong and show the community that you are willing to learn from the mistakes of the past. --Rschen7754 23:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

RfC deletion

edit

You did delete my RfC out of the RfC list. Why? --Nightwish62 (talk) 19:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

User:Legobot/properties.js

edit

Hi Docu,

So I had to disable some of your jobs because they were too big for my system and it was dying :/

Would you be able to do them manually with claimit? Otherwise I'll find another way to process them. Thanks! Legoktm (talk) 03:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, possible you are interesting in Wikidata:Requests for comment/Commons links. I plan to start it tomorrow, you can review and correct/extend if needed. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cyprus

edit

This looks strange to me. I know nothing about the subject, but I thought that the country was named by the island, and the island by the metal? -- Lavallen (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

About marking page for translation

edit

Once you have marked for translation page Help:Basic membership properties. I went on mediawikiwiki, read docs and than re-tagged that page just like table on mw:Help:Extension:Translate/Page translation administration is tagged. I'm sure this is easier for translators now. Just wanted you to know -- Ата (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wrogn coordinates

edit

Hi,

I've corrected the coordinates you've added on Baugé-en-Anjou Q2264404.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:53, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

D2-bot and Docu w. script

edit

Your bot has been listed at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Removal/Inactive bot accounts as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure it's proposed to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot should you need it again. Of course, You may request retaining your bot flag here if you need the bot flag. Regards--GZWDer (talk) 11:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

The bot flags have been removed. Lymantria (talk) 06:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply