Daehan
Welcome to Wikidata, Daehan!
Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
- Introduction – An introduction to the project.
- Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
- Community portal – The portal for community members.
- User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
- Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
- Project chat – Discussions about the project.
- Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Best regards! Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 05:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
editHello, I'm Andreasmperu. Welcome to Wikidata! I noticed that you recently removed a link from an item, but didn't add it anywhere else. If you feel that the link would be better suited to another item, please add it there. (If you don't know how to do that, feel free to contact me at my talk page and I can do it for you.) If you're curious about editing Wikidata, and would like to test things out, please try the Wikidata Sandbox. Thanks, and happy editing! --Andreasm háblame / just talk to me 05:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Merging items
editHallo Daehan,
For merging items, you may want to use the merge.js gadget from help page about merging. It has an option "Request deletion for extra items on RfD" to automatically place a request to delete the emptied page. This way of nominating makes it a lot easier for the admins to process the requests.
With regards,
- - (Cycn/talk) 12:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Cycn,
- Thank you for your comment : I'll sure take it in consideration next time ;)
- Thank you for your help.
- Regards, --Daehan (talk) 20:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- It would have saved you a lot of work with Q28343034 as you could have simply merged it with Isaac Briot (Q6076083). - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 11:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I realized that too late... Thank you. --Daehan (talk) 12:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
- It would have saved you a lot of work with Q28343034 as you could have simply merged it with Isaac Briot (Q6076083). - cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 11:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
professions like etchers
editI think you are right with Rembrandt with printmaking and etching, I have the impression the hierarchy of the different professions need still some classification and artists are not always in the right category. I became aware with querying on visual artists, that not all visual art professions are under that category as some are seen as craft for example. Also, in many cases the general profession 'artist' is used. Is there a hierarchical classification of arts and do we use it in Wikidata? --Hannolans (talk) 17:57, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Please do not merge disambiguations items
editA disambiguation item is exactly that, and should not be merged with another item. If a interwiki link is incorrectly assigned to a disambig then it should be moved, rather than merged. It can be evaluated for deletion after that. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hello User:billinghurst,
- Please check (fy), (de), (cs), (nl), (fr).
- Can you tell me that all those articles are not disambiguation articles?
- Thus, isn't logical to merge them into one item?
- Or maybe there are disambiguation wikidata item and disambiguation wikipedia item?...
- Thank you, --Daehan (talk) 14:34, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- I am asking that you don't merge disambiguation items into other items as it is problematic. A disambiguation item cannot also be an instance of something else with other detail. I am not saying to not fix items that need fixing. Looking at csWP, it appears to be a list of people, possibly of a family, so it is not clearly a disambiguation item, so we should not merge items. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- The guidance is at Wikidata:WikiProject Disambiguation pages/guidelines — billinghurst sDrewth 14:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- The wp:cs page is clearly a disambiguation page, as stated with the picture on the bottom. They are all a disambiguation name of artists of a same family. These articles should be together, to allow navigation between wp articles. Whether we should identify the wikidata item as a disambiguation page or a family artists can be debated, but unmerge them isn't a good solution. Regards, --Daehan (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- The guidance is at Wikidata:WikiProject Disambiguation pages/guidelines — billinghurst sDrewth 14:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- I am asking that you don't merge disambiguation items into other items as it is problematic. A disambiguation item cannot also be an instance of something else with other detail. I am not saying to not fix items that need fixing. Looking at csWP, it appears to be a list of people, possibly of a family, so it is not clearly a disambiguation item, so we should not merge items. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Via crucis
edithttps://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q104619171&diff=1364299713&oldid=1338878518 and the next. You've merged the item for a kind of devotion with the item for a form of art. It's like merging https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q51616 with https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6941842. Panek (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello to you too,
- It's a kind of devotion which is also manifested through a form of art. All Wikipedia articles have the same purpose - explain the via crucis and show related art -, there is no point of distinguishing them.
- The seperation you made between articles the 1st of January wasn't correct. If you want to separate wikidata items, please do, but don't split wikipedia articles as they all treat the same subject. --Daehan (talk) 08:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Fusion de Q118279246 et Q110315739
editDaehan. je viens demander la fusion des éléments Q118279246 et Q110315739. j'ai essayé de suivre tes conseils que tu m'as donnés il y a quelques semaines sur le bistro ici mais mes menus ne se présentent pas de la même manière chez moi sauf erreur de ma part. Pourriez-vous préciser à nouveau la méthode de fusion s'il vous plait? puisque dans mon menu lorsque je déroule " Plus", je ne vois pas l'option "Fusionner peut-être dois-je activer un gadget. Cordialement. Adoscam (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour Adoscam,
- Désolé de ne répondre que maintenant : j'étais en vacances :)
- Quelles options as-tu, quand tu cliques sur "Plus" ? Daehan (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- je vois renommer, s'abonner et smart patrol Adoscam (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Adoscam,
- Tu parles bien de ce que tu vois dans "Plus" de l'élément wikidata ? Désolé si la question paraît saugrenue, mais je suis très surpris qu'on ne voie pas la même chose. Daehan (talk) 12:55, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- PS : pour être clair, la fusion, je peux la faire dès maintenant. Mais je pense que ça vaut le coup de résoudre ton problème avant ;) Daehan (talk) 12:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Justement. c'est ce que je voudrais comprendre à faire. comment fusionner moi même deux éléments sans demander de l'aide . Adoscam (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Adoscam, ok, désolé, je me permets d'insister : as-tu bien cliqué sur le bouton "Plus" de l'élément wikidata que tu souhaites fusionner ?
- Ce qui m'étonne, c'est que tu aies par exemple "Renommer" (qui est plutôt pour une page d'aide ou autre, ou pour un article wikipédia) et "S'abonner" (que je n'ai pas, peut-être s'agit-il de l'étoile transformée en menu) et "Smart patrol" (je ne l'ai pas non-plus : as-tu un statut spécial de patrouilleur ?). Daehan (talk) 14:33, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oui depuis quelques semaine j'ai un statut spécial de patrouilleur sur Wikipédia et je m'essaie de temps en temps. Adoscam (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- D'accord, donc c'est bien sur Wikipédia. Les fusions ne se font que sur wikidata.
- Suis ce lien : Q118279246 (tu es donc sur wikidata).
- Clique sur "Plus" puis "Fusionner avec...".
- Renseigne l'autre élément dans le champ "Fusionner avec :" = "Q110315739".
- Clique sur le bouton bleu "Fusionner".
- Normalement, c'est bon. Daehan (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Daehan. Finalement c'est à travers Special:MergeItems que j'ai finalement pu faire la fusion car je n'ai pas l'onglet fusionner avec dans plus comme vous avez recommandé. Merci en tôt pour tout. Cordialement. Adoscam (talk) 15:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Etonnant ! Vous en avez parlé aux admins de wikidata ?
- Peut-être qu'ils pourront vous aider à configurer le compte pour avoir cet onglet.
- Bonne journée, Daehan (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour
- Je vais essayer d'en parler. cordialement. Adoscam (talk) 08:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Daehan. Finalement c'est à travers Special:MergeItems que j'ai finalement pu faire la fusion car je n'ai pas l'onglet fusionner avec dans plus comme vous avez recommandé. Merci en tôt pour tout. Cordialement. Adoscam (talk) 15:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- D'accord, donc c'est bien sur Wikipédia. Les fusions ne se font que sur wikidata.
- Oui depuis quelques semaine j'ai un statut spécial de patrouilleur sur Wikipédia et je m'essaie de temps en temps. Adoscam (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Justement. c'est ce que je voudrais comprendre à faire. comment fusionner moi même deux éléments sans demander de l'aide . Adoscam (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- PS : pour être clair, la fusion, je peux la faire dès maintenant. Mais je pense que ça vaut le coup de résoudre ton problème avant ;) Daehan (talk) 12:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- je vois renommer, s'abonner et smart patrol Adoscam (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Call for participation in a task-based online experiment
editDear Daehan,
I hope you are doing well,
I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I am working on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.
I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits.
Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published in a research venue.
The experiment should take no more than 15 minutes, and it will be held next week.
If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfA1wfdBfCRlcG3WhDyc-V8lzgPNx3fDFCNXkyn4CSwahXZ_A/viewform?usp=sf_link
Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.
For more information about my project, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa
In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.
Thank you for considering taking part in this research.
Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Kholoudsaa,
- Sorry to answer this late! Your project sounds really interesting :)
- Is it too late to participate?
- Best regards, Daehan (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Pieter-Steph Du Toit
editPourquoi avoir révoqué mes modifications de l'image sur l'élément de PS Du Toit ? Ce n'est pas la bonne image ? DarkVador [Hello there !] 15:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @DarkVador79-UA,
- Désolé, je n'avais pas la volonté de "révoquer". J'ai supprimé l'ajout de l'image, car les droits d'utilisation de cette image sont douteux : j'ai demandé sa suppression sur Commons. Daehan (talk) 15:58, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Compris. C'est dommage, parce qu'elle est de bien meilleure qualité, l'autre est toute floue. DarkVador [Hello there !] 16:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oui, et malheureusement, je crois qu'on va attendre avant d'en avoir une bien, parce que ce n'est pas impossible qu'il raccroche les crampons bientôt... Daehan (talk) 16:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Compris. C'est dommage, parce qu'elle est de bien meilleure qualité, l'autre est toute floue. DarkVador [Hello there !] 16:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)