Objective: Was clinically evaluated the effectiveness of preventive fluoride varnish (Duraphat,Co... more Objective: Was clinically evaluated the effectiveness of preventive fluoride varnish (Duraphat,Colgate) and sealant with glass ionomer cement modified by resin (Vitremer 3M ®) in second molars. Method: The sample included 29 children, aged 3 to 5 years of clinical preventive of Maringá - PR. The experimental design was split-mouth, oral cavity and divided into quadrants, with the use of ceos and occlusal biofilm.They were sealed 58 primary molars (65 and 85), while their antagonist teeth (55 and 75) have the application quarter with fluoride varnish. The elements 54, 64, 74, and 84 were supervised and subjected to mechanical control of plaque. Result: We used the exact test Fisher with a significance level of 5%. Of the 29 children, 26 remained for evaluation of 12 and 24 months. At 6 months, 100% of the teeth were caries free. For the group sealant retention was 100% in total lower arch and 83.87% in the upper arch, a total 93.10% of teeth sealed with total retention, a similar res...
Objective: To evaluated whether changes in intercanine distance and the arc length of the maxilla... more Objective: To evaluated whether changes in intercanine distance and the arc length of the maxilla and mandible in the primary dentition in children of the preventive program in Maringá, Paraná. Method: To analyze the changes in the development of dental arches in the primary dentition, 13 children were evaluated.The models obtained were measured on two occasions with an interval of five years, the average age for first and second molding, respectively 1 year and 9 months and 6 years and 8 months. The measurements obtained in the two measurements were subjected to paired Student's t test to evaluate the reliability of the method. Result: An average increase of intercanine distance of 3.66 mm and 3.21 mm for the upper arch and lower, respectively.The arc length decreased 1.96 mm for the upper arch and 0.43 mm for the lower arch. Conclusion: The arc length tended to decrease with age, especially in the upper jaw and that despite the average increase in intercanine distance, there w...
Objective: Was clinically evaluated the effectiveness of preventive fluoride varnish (Duraphat,Co... more Objective: Was clinically evaluated the effectiveness of preventive fluoride varnish (Duraphat,Colgate) and sealant with glass ionomer cement modified by resin (Vitremer 3M ®) in second molars. Method: The sample included 29 children, aged 3 to 5 years of clinical preventive of Maringá - PR. The experimental design was split-mouth, oral cavity and divided into quadrants, with the use of ceos and occlusal biofilm.They were sealed 58 primary molars (65 and 85), while their antagonist teeth (55 and 75) have the application quarter with fluoride varnish. The elements 54, 64, 74, and 84 were supervised and subjected to mechanical control of plaque. Result: We used the exact test Fisher with a significance level of 5%. Of the 29 children, 26 remained for evaluation of 12 and 24 months. At 6 months, 100% of the teeth were caries free. For the group sealant retention was 100% in total lower arch and 83.87% in the upper arch, a total 93.10% of teeth sealed with total retention, a similar res...
Objective: To evaluated whether changes in intercanine distance and the arc length of the maxilla... more Objective: To evaluated whether changes in intercanine distance and the arc length of the maxilla and mandible in the primary dentition in children of the preventive program in Maringá, Paraná. Method: To analyze the changes in the development of dental arches in the primary dentition, 13 children were evaluated.The models obtained were measured on two occasions with an interval of five years, the average age for first and second molding, respectively 1 year and 9 months and 6 years and 8 months. The measurements obtained in the two measurements were subjected to paired Student's t test to evaluate the reliability of the method. Result: An average increase of intercanine distance of 3.66 mm and 3.21 mm for the upper arch and lower, respectively.The arc length decreased 1.96 mm for the upper arch and 0.43 mm for the lower arch. Conclusion: The arc length tended to decrease with age, especially in the upper jaw and that despite the average increase in intercanine distance, there w...
Uploads
Papers by M. Fracasso